View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
thesoretoothsayer
Joined: 26 Apr 2017
|
Post subject: | |
|
Quote: | Victoria Police were guilty of reprehensible conduct in knowingly encouraging EF to do as she did and were involved in sanctioning atrocious breaches of the sworn duty of every police officer to discharge all duties imposed on them faithfully and according to law without favour or affection, malice or ill-will. As a result, the prosecution of each Convicted Person was corrupted in a manner which debased fundamental premises of the criminal justice system. |
Sounds pretty damning to me. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | ^ However, given that some people may have read the post hinting at her identity before you deleted it, it might be helpful to say that it most definitely is not the person that was there mentioned.
I will provide (quite public and authorised) links to the decisions of the High Court, Court of Appeal and the original trial judge when I am in front of a computer. It is fair to say that there is no further risk to the person capable of arising from speculation here, though - it will be quite obvious from those decisions to anyone who might be motivated by a wish to harm her exactly who she is. |
Well, her clients already know who she is and, as you say if you review some of the supreme court transcripts then google some of the names, her identity is quite clear.
All of the articles published now about her exploits that withhold her name, can be backtracked, including the taping of Paul Dale and the stroke a few years back _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
|
|
|
|
Culprit
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: Port Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
It's amazing how many people know who 3838 actually is. |
|
|
|
|
ronrat
Joined: 22 May 2006 Location: Thailand
|
Post subject: | |
|
What are the bar association doing about this? She is probably thinking about emigrating. _________________ Annoying opposition supporters since 1967. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
The Victorian Bar Council expressed condemnation publicly a couple of days ago. Beyond that, they probably have little immediate interest in it - she hasn’t held a practising certificate (whether issued by the Bar or otherwise) for about 5 years (according to published information I read 2 days ago). |
|
|
|
|
Culprit
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: Port Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
It won't be long before she is named in some overseas Publication. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Interestingly, the link to the first instance public interest immunity decision no longer works. There is either a technical problem at Austlii or there is some further suppression occurring (perhaps in connection with some appeal or other that may by now be on foot). It’s a little curious, really. The breach of confidence reasons for decision are still public but they merely cross-refer to the facts set out in the other (now re-obscured) reasons.
So, here’s a nice pickle - it may be that those of us who saw and read things that were published earlier in the week must now keep quiet about them. Best not to speculate further about anything based on what we know, since we might not now be allowed to know it.
On another, slightly less stultifying note, it might interest some of you to know that, for constitutional reasons (amongst others), the Royal Commission will not be permitted to enquire into things that have been decided by the Courts (so, the Royal Commission will probably have to perform an interesting dance around the findings of fact in the various judgments) but will probably be permitted to re-examine matters that were the subject of the 2015 IBAC report (not that we’ll know, since the detail of that’s presently secret, too). Don’t expect to see any judges in the box at the RC, unless the retired Court of Appeal Judge who wrote the IBAC report is called - that was an executive act on his part, not a judicial one.
I’m greatly looking forward to reviewing the terms of reference/letters patent with a view to anticipating which interlocutory application to the Supreme Court to prevent the Commission proceeding to hear about certain matters will be made first. See, eg, Firman v Lasry, for those of you who remember the MAS Royal Commission. |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
Culprit wrote: | It won't be long before she is named in some overseas Publication. |
The case was referred to in the Daily Mail, they had no hesitation in naming the AFL Footballer subject to the recent release of text messages but maintained confidentiality in this case.
I really don't see the point of the confidentiality. All her clients know and they're the ones most likely to exact retribution. Colleagues know, the crime media know and it's pretty bloody easy to figure out . _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
That is a rather sweeping generalization. |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
stui magpie wrote: | Culprit wrote: | It won't be long before she is named in some overseas Publication. |
The case was referred to in the Daily Mail, they had no hesitation in naming the AFL Footballer subject to the recent release of text messages but maintained confidentiality in this case.
I really don't see the point of the confidentiality. All her clients know and they're the ones most likely to exact retribution. Colleagues know, the crime media know and it's pretty bloody easy to figure out . |
In this case it seems there’s a suppression order or something in place, so media outlets (and even in bulletin boards, in theory!) would be breaking the law by revealing her name. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
I have just had an opportunity to read the Herald-Sun's 4 December 2018 report in hard copy. It is (and I say this without my tongue in my cheek) an excellent, if slightly chilling, read. If you get the opportunity, read at least the detailed timeline that runs across the bottom of 6 pages of the feature.
I see it reported there, amongst many other things, that Lawyer X was paid $3 Million just before the drawn Grand Final in settlement of her April 2010 civil claim against the then former and current Victoria Police chief commissioners.
I also see that some details reflected in the report are not now accessible on the web by standard searching. This does lead to the inevitable question - do those responsible for obscuring this information think that sophisticated career criminals can't use the google "cached" search function? |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
I don't think anyone's so naive as to think that people who want to discover this information can't do so – and even if the internet archive wasn't there, there's always word of mouth. I guess there's still an argument for the suppression order as a form of harm mitigation, though, as it makes dissemination of info at least a little more complicated. It seems she was already effectively in witness protection around a decade ago, so perhaps it's possible that these revelations won't even change her circumstances that greatly. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace
Last edited by David on Thu Dec 06, 2018 10:25 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
Culprit wrote: | It's amazing how many people know who 3838 actually is. |
thats a hell of a figure! _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
|