View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
thebaldfacts
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
thebaldfacts wrote: | Welcome to Collingwood Daniel. Can never have enough players with skill and class.
Hope that his body holds up well.
A 3 year deal worth up to $1.8M with comp to North being only pick 32.
Based on reported dollars that seems low, so can only assume that the 3 year might well be heavily performance based. |
This is confusing. Tigers getting pick 26 for Vickery who only has a 2 year deal @ $500 per year.
Something doesn't add up.
Looks like Wells deal might have a lot of performance incentives included. |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
_________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
winpies
Joined: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
Welcome to the mighty Pies Daniel. _________________ carn the mighty pies! |
|
|
|
|
droversdog65
Joined: 27 Nov 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
thebaldfacts wrote: | thebaldfacts wrote: | Welcome to Collingwood Daniel. Can never have enough players with skill and class.
Hope that his body holds up well.
A 3 year deal worth up to $1.8M with comp to North being only pick 32.
Based on reported dollars that seems low, so can only assume that the 3 year might well be heavily performance based. |
This is confusing. Tigers getting pick 26 for Vickery who only has a 2 year deal @ $500 per year.
Something doesn't add up.
Looks like Wells deal might have a lot of performance incentives included. |
Agreed on performance incentives. |
|
|
|
|
Deja Vu
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
Welcome to the first welcome to thread!
Hooray!
And welcome to Daniel of course 😀 _________________ http://youtu.be/hvtdbfI1sqQ |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Location: Bendigo
|
Post subject: | |
|
thebaldfacts wrote: | Welcome to Collingwood Daniel. Can never have enough players with skill and class.
Hope that his body holds up well.
A 3 year deal worth up to $1.8M with comp to North being only pick 32.
Based on reported dollars that seems low, so can only assume that the 3 year might well be heavily performance based. |
It's a 2nd rounder following North's current pick. Vickery earned pick 26 for less money ($1m 2 year deal) but again it is still a 2nd rounder based on where the Tigas would nominally have their pick if they hadn't traded it away last year.
Last edited by jackcass on Tue Oct 11, 2016 4:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
qldmagpie67
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
Welcome Daniel to the magpie army.
Hope you have 3 career best years at the club and taste several finals games in that time |
|
|
|
|
Geek
geek
Joined: 06 Apr 2006 Location: Jacana
|
Post subject: | |
|
Wells's age comes into it too |
|
|
|
|
Damien
Me Noah & Flynn @ the G
Joined: 21 Jan 1999 Location: Croydon Vic
|
Post subject: | |
|
The Wells deal is $1.5 million over 3 years apparently. that doesn't necessarily mean $500K each year either. It could be heavily front-ended.
This guy is silk. Let's just hope he stays fit. Given our lack of a strong trading position getting a ready made of this quality as a FA is a great result which will immediately improve our efficiency and quality of ball use. _________________ 'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Last edited by Damien on Tue Oct 11, 2016 4:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
droversdog65
Joined: 27 Nov 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Damien wrote: | The Wells deal is $1.5 million over 3 years apparently. that doesn't necessarily mean $500K each year either. |
Yep with his age there will very likely be performance triggers built in. |
|
|
|
|
mooretreloar
Joined: 21 Sep 2016
|
Post subject: | |
|
droversdog65 wrote: | Damien wrote: | The Wells deal is $1.5 million over 3 years apparently. that doesn't necessarily mean $500K each year either. |
Yep with his age there will very likely be performance triggers built in. |
Surprise, surprise Mr Cigar, journalists wrong again about 3 * $600k.
Also, Mr Cigar, Mr Cloke did not get back into the team until round 11 from round 4, suggest he was playing rubbish.
Re-iterate my thoughts from yesterday, rapt to get a person of good character to the club, that is a very very good footballer. Welcome Daniel and I look forward to you helping us contend for a flag in the years to come. |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Collingwood TV contacted hime by phone and he said apart from playing he hopes to work with Bucks
and other coaches by working with our young players fast tracking their progress _________________ I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
CarringbushCigar
Joined: 15 Nov 2007 Location: wherever I lay my beanie
|
Post subject: | |
|
mooretreloar wrote: | droversdog65 wrote: | Damien wrote: | The Wells deal is $1.5 million over 3 years apparently. that doesn't necessarily mean $500K each year either. |
Yep with his age there will very likely be performance triggers built in. |
Surprise, surprise Mr Cigar, journalists wrong again about 3 * $600k.
Also, Mr Cigar, Mr Cloke did not get back into the team until round 11 from round 4, suggest he was playing rubbish.
Re-iterate my thoughts from yesterday, rapt to get a person of good character to the club, that is a very very good footballer. Welcome Daniel and I look forward to you helping us contend for a flag in the years to come. |
so the journalists are wrong about 3*600 but right about 3*500 ??
have u finished primary school yet ? |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Over coffee the other day I discussed a plan we had
to play Swannie a bit down fwd where he could kick his 2 goals a game and feed off a couple more
Swanny could find that "sweet spot" where goals were created but fate changed that
Now we have a player who knows how to find the same spot ,kick those goals and Danny was well known for his goal assist ability
So that plan we had for Swanny its yours now Daniel _________________ I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
|