| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
I think we need to add some KP options to the list before this period is over. Only 5 primary listed players >195cm and one of those is yet to play a game.
Our talls (or arguably (almost) talls >=190cm):
Cox 211/108
Grundy 203/102
Moore 201/98
Lynch* 200/97
McLarty 197/91
Reid 196/98
Goldsack 193/93
Oxley 193/85
Dunn 192/102
Wills 192/87
De Goey 191/91
Pendlebury 191/91
Scharenberg 191/88
Sier (uncontracted) 191/89
Langdon 190/86
Crisp 190/91
Howe 190/88
I found it odd that Pendles and De Goey have same height/weight given their body shapes look very different to me.
Brooksby 197/99, Hansen 197/98 and Jaksch 195/90 shape as cheap options.
_________________
All We Can Be |
|
|
|
 |
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MightyMagpie wrote: | Remain uncontracted:
Jarryd Blair 2017
Ben Sinclair 2017 (FA)
Jackson Ramsay 2017
Josh Smith 2017
Brayden Sier 2017 |
Becoming clearer that the Club is weighing these guys up against the cheap trade options (eg Murray) and potential delisted FAs (eg Brooksby, Hansen, Mullett etc).
I'm guessing Sinclair and Ramsay injuries not helping their cause. That aside, my priorities would be Sinclair, Ramsay, Smith, Blair and Sier.
_________________
All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
|
|
|
|
stui magpie 
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MightyMagpie wrote: | I think we need to add some KP options to the list before this period is over. Only 5 primary listed players >195cm and one of those is yet to play a game.
Our talls (or arguably (almost) talls >=190cm):
Cox 211/108
Grundy 203/102
Moore 201/98
Lynch* 200/97
McLarty 197/91
Reid 196/98
Goldsack 193/93
Oxley 193/85
Dunn 192/102
Wills 192/87
De Goey 191/91
Pendlebury 191/91
Scharenberg 191/88
Sier (uncontracted) 191/89
Langdon 190/86
Crisp 190/91
Howe 190/88
I found it odd that Pendles and De Goey have same height/weight given their body shapes look very different to me.
Brooksby 197/99, Hansen 197/98 and Jaksch 195/90 shape as cheap options. |
Whereas Sier who is basically the same size as them both is built like a sherman tank.
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
|
|
|
|
Pies2016
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I'm interested on anyone's thoughts on the following scenario ?
Dockers now have pick 2 and 5.
I'm confident the first four picks will be mids but I'm not sure what to think the dockers will do with 5 ??
My point is, if the Dockers go with a tall, it might be that IF Collingwood were planning to go with a tall, they may now have to consider plan B ( the second best tall ) because I have a feeling that dockers may go with the first tall of the draft at five.
Any thoughts on the Dockers second pick at five ?
I'm going with a tall ( unless they are scared off by the go home factor )
They may also go with Hayes as a super promising ruckman. That would suit us fine if they went that way. |
|
|
|
|
masoncox
masoncox
Joined: 31 Aug 2015
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pies2016 wrote: | I'm interested on anyone's thoughts on the following scenario ?
Dockers now have pick 2 and 5.
I'm confident the first four picks will be mids but I'm not sure what to think the dockers will do with 5 ??
My point is, if the Dockers go with a tall, it might be that IF Collingwood were planning to go with a tall, they may now have to consider plan B ( the second best tall ) because I have a feeling that dockers may go with the first tall of the draft at five.
Any thoughts on the Dockers second pick at five ?
I'm going with a tall ( unless they are scared off by the go home factor )
They may also go with Hayes as a super promising ruckman. That would suit us fine if they went that way. |
No one goes for tall/ruckmen in the early part of the draft these days. Need to be an athletic type like Moore to go early.
So bet your bottom dollar that Hayes won't go in the top 5. |
|
|
|
|
K
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pies2016 wrote: | I'm interested on anyone's thoughts on the following scenario ?
Dockers now have pick 2 and 5.
I'm confident the first four picks will be mids but I'm not sure what to think the dockers will do with 5 ??
...
Any thoughts on the Dockers second pick at five ?
... |
Hmmm.... Picks 2 and 5? I reckon they'll go with Thomas & Pendlebury. |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Collingwood has officially nominated Tyler Brown as a father-son with paperwork lodged - now they wait for the bid https://t.co/tbRzLQToZa
_________________
All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully 
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pies2016 wrote: | I'm interested on anyone's thoughts on the following scenario ?
Dockers now have pick 2 and 5.
I'm confident the first four picks will be mids but I'm not sure what to think the dockers will do with 5 ??
My point is, if the Dockers go with a tall, it might be that IF Collingwood were planning to go with a tall, they may now have to consider plan B ( the second best tall ) because I have a feeling that dockers may go with the first tall of the draft at five.
Any thoughts on the Dockers second pick at five ?
I'm going with a tall ( unless they are scared off by the go home factor )
They may also go with Hayes as a super promising ruckman. That would suit us fine if they went that way. |
FWIW Hayes is not rated too highly by Knightmare, Twomey had him in top 10 ten as did Josh Elliot of the Roar.
I still want Bonar  that is best available
_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MightyMagpie wrote: | | Collingwood has officially nominated Tyler Brown as a father-son with paperwork lodged - now they wait for the bid https://t.co/tbRzLQToZa |
Great stuff. Hope we land the SOG, no other club tries to nominate him too early & we preserve our round three and four picks if that is possible.
_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
|
|
|
|
K
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MightyMagpie wrote: | | http://www.espn.com.au/afl/story/_/id/21134708/knightmare-october-phantom-draft-first-two-rounds |
Is this his ranking, or who he thinks the clubs should pick based on their needs?
Are the two Fogartys related? Hope the club know which is which  .
Err... Just saw it stated that they're not related. (This dispels the notion that Darcy ate all of Lachlan's food.) |
|
|
|
|
Pies2016
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
^^^
I just wait for Emma Quayle. She is ridiculously good at getting the first round right ... and in correct order.
Which reminds me, for anyone who enjoys the politics and back room happenings of the AFL draft, her book " the draft " is a very good read.
Might even change a few Nicksters perceptions of what really goes on behind the scenes ( then again, it might not ) |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
