Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Do we have the balls and Hart that Adelaide have?

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> The Draft & Trade Moot (DTM) forum
 
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Big T 



Joined: 18 Oct 2003
Location: Torino, Italy

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:08 pm
Post subject: Do we have the balls and Hart that Adelaide have?Reply with quote

Adelaide made a tough but strong decision with Ben Hart. Would have hurt them badly to tell him but that takes courage and ticker.

So do the Pies have the same courage as Adelaide. Are these types of decisions the difference between long term success and failure?

_________________
Buon Giorno
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Cam Capricorn

Nick's BB Member #166


Joined: 10 May 2002
Location: Springvale

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:20 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think we have that courage.

If we did Licuria, Lockyer & Wakelin would have played their last games.

_________________
Get back on top.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Meddler 



Joined: 24 Jul 2006


PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:42 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Cam wrote:
I don't think we have that courage.

If we did Licuria, Lockyer & Wakelin would have played their last games.


wakelin.... definately.... licuria and lockyer..... well.... if we are talking Bout delisting..... why would you.... they would be worth something on the open market...
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
lethal68 



Joined: 20 Sep 2004
Location: Adelaide

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:45 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Can't compare these guys with Hart. While he has been a great player, his body is stuffed. He is the wrong side of 30 and continually breaks down with injury.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Cam Capricorn

Nick's BB Member #166


Joined: 10 May 2002
Location: Springvale

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:48 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Lockyer and Licuria worth something? Rubbish. We keep them because they are loved. Was Woewodin inferior to them? Not by much if at all. Was Betheras loved any less? No way. If Betheras goes, they should go. But they won't now will they?
_________________
Get back on top.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Big T 



Joined: 18 Oct 2003
Location: Torino, Italy

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:08 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Lets face it, Crows will do what it takes, they are hurting badly and they won 2 GFs in LATE 90's.

We are carrying Harts and we haven't won for 16 years.

I think this speaks volumes for the difference between the CULTURES of the 2 clubs at present.

_________________
Buon Giorno
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
DaVe86 Scorpio

Man of Steele


Joined: 08 Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne

PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:07 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Wakelin i agree has done his dash...however Licuria and Lockyer are still required players.

Our midfield is the problem at the moment, and you want to get rid of 2 of the core players out of it??? Until we get something better, we may as well keep this proven performers whilst we rebuild the midfield. WIthout these 2, our midfield is even worst. We will have absolutely no depth whatsoever.

I agree that these guys should be faded out. They should not be walk up starts. If they are out of form, they should be dropped to williamstown, and should be fighting hard for their positions. However, until we get better midfielders, they are required players, even if it is just for depth.

Remember Didak and Holland will miss a chunk of next year as well. We will not have a midfield without Lockyer, Licuira, Holland and Didak next year. Then we are also talking about delisting Rowe, Yakka etc. We will be a team of KPP's only.

Before we delist these guys, lets make sure there is some quality players ready to slot straight into the middle. I agree we should not be leaving out guys like Pendles, Isles, Thomas who play well in reserves to continue playing Licca and Lockyer however.

_________________
There's more to life than footy.........just not much more.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
rand corp 



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: south east asia

PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:12 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

If we had balls Licca, Lockyer & Lonie would all be trade bait right now
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Johnson#26 



Joined: 18 Dec 2003


PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:23 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Licca's still worth plenty to this list, as is Wakes.

But I'd be offering Tarks and Lonie up for trade. I'm pretty sentimental when it comes to players, and these two are part of the 2002 and 2003 GF sides, and Lonie was sensational in the '02 finals series, but I've got no clue where all that spark has gone.

Like them both, but I'm sure they could be used as bargaining chips.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> The Draft & Trade Moot (DTM) forum All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Page 1 of 1   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group