| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
r_betheras_10 
Joined: 21 May 2003
Location: victoria
|
| Post subject: BETHERAS "in" LOKAN "out" |  |
|
Credit to Matthew Lokan, because he is a fantastic player, but is he as good as the hard hitting Rupert Betheras? They play similar roles, but i think Rupert plays his role better.
Also, were is Heath Scotland, he should also be in the team??? |
|
|
|
 |
BUCKS
Joined: 06 Sep 2001
Location: VICTORIA
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Betheras is struggling in the reserves…why should he get a call up?
his not in our best side anymore. |
|
|
|
|
ramjet21 
Joined: 31 Mar 2002
Location: perth
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| maybe. could depend on match ups but i dont know a huge amount about the st kilda forwards. i think rupe has been ok at willy without doing anything special, likewise scotland. mcgough had 40 odd touches last week but the main change will be for presti. cloke is the obvious choice - praying its not kinnear. i'd rather walker or richo get a game ahead of ben. |
|
|
|
|
r_betheras_10
Joined: 21 May 2003
Location: victoria
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| ramjet21, i talked to neil balme at the w'town game in f/ston, and he said tristen walker should replace presti. |
|
|
|
|
Foreverpies
Joined: 22 Sep 2001
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Rupert could be in our best side given the chance.....
He will play well because he knows he needs to to stay in the side!!
Go Rupe UR A SUPERSTAR |
|
|
|
|
Cam 
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002
Location: Springvale
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| drop lokan? your crazy! two games ago he shut down McLeod! He's fast, good long kick and will get better with experience. Rupert, as much as i love him, has peaked. |
|
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 26 Jul 2000
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Lokan and Rubert play similar roles?
what a load of hog wash
There roles are vastly different
The reason why McGough and Betheras were dropped from the side a couple of weeks ago was because of lack of intensity at the ball
their lack of hard tackles cost them and that's why they went back to the magoos
Cloke was dropped because he didn't follow team rules and more imortantly man up on his opponents closely enough he wanted to play off his man and do his own thing
cloke will play this week and probably take hamill |
|
|
|
|
Nova Kaine 
Winners never quit, and quitters NEVER win.
Joined: 05 May 2003
Location: Glenorchy, Tasmania
|
| Post subject: | |
|
But isn't Rupe a Centreman and Lokan is a Forward/Backman?
_________________
"The minute you start talking about what you're going to do if you lose, you have lost." |
|
|
|
|
*Rach_luvs_Lonie* 
*~LiL bItTa CoUnTrY..LiL bItA mJ~*
Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, LONIE LAND!!
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Yeh i think Rupe should be given another chance to play in the seniors...hes a great player given the chance and i think the saints game would have been the perfect chance to play him in the team...lets hope he plays next week!!! GO RUPE!- Leah misses u!!! 
Luv Rach!!xoxox |
|
|
|
|
Joel
Joined: 23 Mar 1999
Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Nova Kaine wrote: | | But isn't Rupe a Centreman and Lokan is a Forward/Backman? |
Lokan was full forward for Port Adelaide (in the SANFL), but was dropped to the reserves when his form dropped, as far as I know (correct me if I'm wrong). Judkins saw some potential in him as a backman, so I guess you are right in regards to him.
I don't mind Rupert as a goal sneak, but if he isn't in form then he shouldn't be brought back to the seniors. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
