View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Johnson#26
Joined: 18 Dec 2003
|
Post subject: Cain Akland | |
|
Is he worth looking into? Port ruckman behind Brogan, Primus and Lade. |
|
|
|
|
tdesmaele
Joined: 23 May 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Definitely if he can be had cheap. We need a 3rd backup ruckman in the event that Richards or Fraser misses.
At this stage we would be relying on either Hall, C.Cloke, Rocca, Walker or Crow to fill that void. |
|
|
|
|
Joel
Joined: 23 Mar 1999 Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
Post subject: | |
|
Cloke et al. can be the 3rd backup I reckon. |
|
|
|
|
Pa Marmo
Side by Side
Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Location: Nicks BB member #617
|
Post subject: | |
|
Must disagree Joel. We should be chasing a ruckmen so as to free up Fraser to play as a permanent Forward. 2002 we nearly pulled it off and look where Josh spent most of his time. He is not a true ruckmen but I believe a major forward in waiting. _________________ Genesis 1:1 |
|
|
|
|
Johnson#26
Joined: 18 Dec 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
If we are going to lose McKee, we must get a new ruckman. Akerland would come cheap. I'd look at him, as the Hawks are also after him. |
|
|
|
|
rand corp
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: south east asia
|
Post subject: | |
|
Think we have plenty of ruck and back up options, we just need the top 5 to have big years in 2005.
Richards
Josh
Rocca
Cam C
Tex Walker
Trav C
Crowe
Fanning
Hall |
|
|
|
|
|