View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sultan of spin
Joined: 31 Aug 2003 Location: Burnley
|
Post subject: McGough and Shaw to be traded? | |
|
According to chanel 10 news tonight McGough has requested a trade to further his career (ala Scotland) and under the right circumstances Shaw could also be trded.
The report also claimed Kinnear and McKee have retired, which I have also heard from another source as well. |
|
|
|
|
spoljar
Joined: 16 Mar 2004 Location: Lynbrook
|
Post subject: | |
|
Just heard in Fox Footy News that McGough has requested the trade. Also said that Shaw and Mckee would be offered as possible trades. Did not mention anything about Kinnear. |
|
|
|
|
maggies34
Joined: 13 Sep 2004
|
Post subject: Re: McGough and Shaw to be traded? | |
|
Sultan of spin wrote: | According to chanel 10 news tonight McGough has requested a trade to further his career (ala Scotland) and under the right circumstances Shaw could also be trded.
The report also claimed Kinnear and McKee have retired, which I have also heard from another source as well. |
The problem is there onfield performances over the last year and shaws last two grand finals have been ordinary to say the least, i dont think they will attract much more that draft picks!! _________________ WE WILL WIN THE FLAG!!! |
|
|
|
|
sq3
Joined: 30 Mar 2004 Location: Gold Coast/Tampa
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies need to be very careful here with MCG.
Pagan will want him badly to replace Ratten and they can then have an in and under player with good hands and outriders of Scoots and Stevens who both have very good disposal on both sides of the body.
This could really bite us big time. |
|
|
|
|
bokka
Joined: 11 Apr 1999 Location: NY, Ex Land of Brave and Free
|
Post subject: | |
|
I agree sq3 - keep mcG on and give him more game time. FAct he is dissatisfied suggests he is pretty well over the OP, which would make him an even bigger loss. |
|
|
|
|
mattdally
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
trade them both.
also get rid of obree, lokan and lonie.
time for a change. clean out a bit i reckon...
shaw and mcg have had enough chances.
shaw = risky
mcg = slow
neither can kick
obree is a worry and lokan's been a dud since he arrived |
|
|
|
|
mattdally
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
sorry, take lonie off that list. he is a required player |
|
|
|
|
Johnson#26
Joined: 18 Dec 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
I don't think MCG has had enough chances. It think the opposite. He could be a gun. We shouldn't trade them. McGough is in our best side.
How Lonie could go amazes me. |
|
|
|
|
|