Phantom Top 10
Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
WhyPhilWhy?
WhyPhilWhy?
Joined: 09 Oct 2001
Location: Location: Location:
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| Sorry, Kit can't be in the Top 10. He went under the father-son rule. |
|
|
|
 |
Cam 
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002
Location: Springvale
|
| Post subject: | |
|
lol. sensational phil.
_________________
Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
wigboy 
Joined: 20 May 2004
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Just come across the stats for sharp this year. averaging 26.7 poss per game.
14.7 kicks 12 handballs and 4.9 marks |
|
|
|
|
Johnson#26
Joined: 18 Dec 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Joel wrote: | | If anyone would like to do a phanton draft for the top 10 or 20 players, for Nick's Collingwood Page, feel free to do so, and give me a yell. Make sure they are well researched though. I will put them together in one article. |
You can use mine if you want - check your PM's.
Deluca must be very good if he isn't allowed to go this season. What about Eddie Betts? I've heard that he is a bit of a Rodan.
Good to hear Sharp is quick - because that is a must. Same with Tambling - the faster the better. |
|
|
|
|
Nath 
Joined: 04 May 2004
Location: Victoria
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Johnno, Eddie Betts has been invited to the National Draft Camp which is held at the AIS in October, which automatically means that at least four clubs have listed him in the top 30 draftees they would be interested in viewing further.
I spose Eddie's problem is that he is small, and quite small at that. He is relatively well built, but he lacks genuine height, even for a rover. If he gets picked, I'd imagine it's be in the bottom half of the draft, but no doubt there is a team out there that would be interested in pursuing him, his skills dictate that he can play forward and back, which differs from the stereotypical mecurial aboriginal forward, but I wouldn't think that the Pies would be interested. |
|
|
|
|
Johnson#26
Joined: 18 Dec 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Nath wrote: | | I spose Eddie's problem is that he is small, and quite small at that. He is relatively well built, but he lacks genuine height, even for a rover. If he gets picked, I'd imagine it's be in the bottom half of the draft, but no doubt there is a team out there that would be interested in pursuing him, his skills dictate that he can play forward and back, which differs from the stereotypical mecurial aboriginal forward, but I wouldn't think that the Pies would be interested. |
Its sad that small players are fading out. Only guys like Burns, Lockyer and Brent Harvey are still surviving. Rodan will be gone by next year.
If Betts is quick, we should have a look. I though Craig Ednie (Richmond 2002) would have been a good player, but his lack of height counted against him. Bettts would be worth a shot late in the draft. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
