Where to play Mark Richardson

[The OX]

Mark Richardson, is a fairly good CHB, what worries me is there is a big question all the time on whether he can stay injury free. And the answer is NO. We will have to do without him for at least 5 games next year due to injury odds on. Then when he comes back from those, he takes a week or two to get back in the swing of things. So this increases the number 5 to 10-12 games he will not be right up to it, the other 10-12 games he is easily our best option. The reason why I say this is because he is one of those type of players that play old, and get injured more so than some others.

So thats not an answer thats a problem outlined there. The answer, will have to be Cloke, Kinnear or like someone said give McKee a go, he may surprise us. Other than that Wakeling or Rocca, but for Rocca to go back, McKee or another ruckman we may pick in the draft such as O'Farrell have to stand up, releasing Fraser to CHF. Well all I can say is this, I wish we had a back up ruck like Richo is for the CHB position.

[Lockyer24]

Id prefer Richo over Wakelin myself, I thought Richo was playing decent footy before he hurt his foot. BK is the obvious replacement but can he hold down that spot? time will tell.
I think hes better attacking than defending.