View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007 Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
^ if someone calls Christian belief unnatural and abnormal (or the many other things it is called), I just shrug my shoulders and accept that I find their views simplistic, overly strident and a little sad, but as long as they are held in good faith and do not seek to prohibit it or do violence against it, I do not assume that they are a wicked person. Many atheists mean very well. We should not confuse principled disagreement with evil, unless real evil is called down, or done. That's the issue here. _________________ Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
David
to wish impossible things
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: the edge of the deep green sea
|
Post subject: | |
|
That was actually a typo on my part she said abominable, not abnormal. But yes, I mostly agree with your conclusion, except for the fact I don't believe evil actually exists! _________________ "Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." â Julian Assange |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
David wrote: | Disappointed that you'd take that view, Stui. For me it's 100% about people, not gender.. |
gender isn't just a social thing. men and women are chemically and physically different. No amount of social brainwashing will change that.
Each add something different as a parent. I'm not saying 2 guys or 2 girls can't be good parents, they certainly can and would probably be better than single parent families and a lot of traditional families because of the people.
Don't forget, I raised 2 kids as basically a single dad. I've known single mums who were brilliant and i've known some who were utter crap. In that regard it's about people not gender as you say but the best possible result is a good one of each to provide balance. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
What if they are both Carlton supporters? |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | What if they are both Carlton supporters? |
Sterilise them and ban them from adopting _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007 Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
David wrote: | That was actually a typo on my part she said abominable, not abnormal. But yes, I mostly agree with your conclusion, except for the fact I don't believe evil actually exists! |
The last sentence needs a "please explain". We probably have a different definition. _________________ Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Do you like talking to me? You and I are on the same wavelength, like a sacrificial offering to assuage the British entertainment industry's collective guilt and shame for turning a blind eye to or condoning such behaviour on a widespread basis for the past half-century. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
stui magpie wrote: | Pies4shaw wrote: | What if they are both Carlton supporters? |
Sterilise them and ban them from adopting |
Why so soft? |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Who are you talking about? |
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007 Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
stui magpie wrote: | David wrote: | Disappointed that you'd take that view, Stui. For me it's 100% about people, not gender.. |
gender isn't just a social thing. men and women are chemically and physically different. No amount of social brainwashing will change that.
Each add something different as a parent. I'm not saying 2 guys or 2 girls can't be good parents, they certainly can and would probably be better than single parent families and a lot of traditional families because of the people.
Don't forget, I raised 2 kids as basically a single dad. I've known single mums who were brilliant and i've known some who were utter crap. In that regard it's about people not gender as you say but the best possible result is a good one of each to provide balance. |
There is a difference between a single case and a population. Better to be brought up in a household with two well-adjusted gay people than in the moral, physical and emotional squalor which characterises many heterosexual households today, especially among the underclass we have fostered. At the population level, however, wise policy would recognise that children were designed by nature (aka evolution) to be brought up by men and women, who are on average different, as you said, Stui. _________________ Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
The population level is where it's at. Wisdom is a virtue. |
|
|
|
|
David
to wish impossible things
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: the edge of the deep green sea
|
Post subject: | |
|
stui magpie wrote: | David wrote: | Disappointed that you'd take that view, Stui. For me it's 100% about people, not gender.. |
gender isn't just a social thing. men and women are chemically and physically different. No amount of social brainwashing will change that.
Each add something different as a parent. I'm not saying 2 guys or 2 girls can't be good parents, they certainly can and would probably be better than single parent families and a lot of traditional families because of the people.
Don't forget, I raised 2 kids as basically a single dad. I've known single mums who were brilliant and i've known some who were utter crap. In that regard it's about people not gender as you say but the best possible result is a good one of each to provide balance. |
You can get balance in differing personalities, life skills, interests, temperaments and so on. I don't really see that as being dependent in any way on genitalia and hormones, and it's also quite possible that heterosexual couples like that are not in the majority. Why can't we just say that the ideal is two dedicated, loving parents? Why treat same-sex parents like they're starting with a pre-ordained handicap?
You might think you're being fair, but imagine if someone said "sure, some interracial couples can be great, but at the end of the day the ideal is two parents of the same ethnicity". And yeah, you know, maybe there are hurdles related to cultural difference, racism and so on. But it doesn't sound great, does it? _________________ "Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." â Julian Assange |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
All parents should need a licence.
I'd rather two committed dad's or mums than a pedophile in hiding or the mum from hell.
Case by case basis _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
Mountains Magpie
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Location: Somewhere between now and then
|
Post subject: | |
|
think positive wrote: | All parents should need a licence.
I'd rather two committed dad's or mums than a pedophile in hiding or the mum from hell.
Case by case basis |
So.....who issues the license? _________________ Spiral progress, unstoppable,
exhausted sources replaced by perversion |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Mountains Magpie wrote: | think positive wrote: | All parents should need a licence.
I'd rather two committed dad's or mums than a pedophile in hiding or the mum from hell.
Case by case basis |
So.....who issues the license? |
VicRoads _________________ âI even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didnât keep âem under long enoughâ Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
|