View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kymbo5@yahoo.com.au
Joined: 23 Mar 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
It was a bad day for Jordan Sniper Lewis. No third man up and a harder line on punching people in the stomach. His two best (and some argue only) attributes are being phased out. _________________ kymbo |
|
|
|
|
neil
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 Location: Queensland
|
Post subject: | |
|
swoop42 wrote: | Witts will be happy with this ruling. |
Yes thought the same thing _________________ Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum |
|
|
|
|
Member 7167
"What Good Fortune For Governments That The People Do Not Think" - Adolf Hitler.
Joined: 18 Dec 2008 Location: The Collibran Hideout
|
Post subject: | |
|
think positive wrote: | piedys wrote: | kymbo5@yahoo.com.au wrote: | Excellent change by the AFL. Protects ruckman from the gutless snipers such as Lewis and Hodge. |
Yeah, cry us a river arse wipes. |
Yeah that made my day!
As some one said, rather unfair timing, but hey, what do you expect from such a pathetic, corrupt, pig faced, cheating, unethical, laughable, vindictive, scumball self serving, pack of criminals called the AFL? |
Something else we agree upon _________________ Now Retired - Every Day Is A Saturday |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | Dave The Man wrote: | ronrat wrote: | Luke Hodge, Dangerfield and Blicavs have twitted their disapproval. Stiff. |
Also Hurts our Mitch McCarthy who would been perfect 3rd Man Up |
Assuming he ever gets up to standard to play VFL football. |
So you think McCarthy is a Utter and Complete Hack and we wasted on someone that could not even play in the U-12's _________________ I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
WhyPhilWhy? wrote: | I don't understand the problem they are attempting to solve. |
Because they Change Rules for the Sake Of It _________________ I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
Skids
Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175
|
Post subject: | |
|
Dave The Man wrote: | WhyPhilWhy? wrote: | I don't understand the problem they are attempting to solve. |
Because they Change Rules for the Sake Of It |
If they didn't change rules Dave we'd still have; No centre square, no cameras on goal umpires for close calls, no interchange, boundary umpires with white hankies instead of whistles, goal & behind posts 20 metres apart & Captains awarding free kicks.... just to mention a few of the hundreds of rule changes over the years.
This is a good rule change. _________________ Don't count the days, make the days count. |
|
|
|
|
WhyPhilWhy?
WhyPhilWhy?
Joined: 09 Oct 2001 Location: Location: Location:
|
Post subject: | |
|
And now I understand - thank you kymbo |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
kymbo5@yahoo.com.au wrote: | WhyPhilWhy? wrote: | I don't understand the problem they are attempting to solve. |
It's at least two fold.
1. Protect the ruckman from injury caused by collisions they can't see and should have to expect.
2. Make it easier for the umpires to officiate the rucking contests including when ruckman are penalised for "blocking" the person trying to be third man up.
It's a good rule, kudos to the AFL. |
3 fold. To promote the role of ruckman and avoid the consequence of having teams of 6'4" running machines. The natural evolution of the 3rd man up was to totally nullify the effect of ruckmen at stoppages. You could have two midfielders competing for the ruck at a stoppage if all they are doing is acting as a launching pad for a 3rd man up from each team.
Aussie Rules has always been a game accessible for beanpoles and munchkins and every level between. That's a good thing to keep. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Thanks what you want going to games live something I did or had the chance to do until recent years so I'm comfortable to barrack from the lounge room as I used to listening on the radio live TV games is not something I I will remember your suggestion. |
|
|
|
|
kymbo5@yahoo.com.au
Joined: 23 Mar 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
stui magpie wrote: | kymbo5@yahoo.com.au wrote: | WhyPhilWhy? wrote: | I don't understand the problem they are attempting to solve. |
It's at least two fold.
1. Protect the ruckman from injury caused by collisions they can't see and should have to expect.
2. Make it easier for the umpires to officiate the rucking contests including when ruckman are penalised for "blocking" the person trying to be third man up.
It's a good rule, kudos to the AFL. |
3 fold. To promote the role of ruckman and avoid the consequence of having teams of 6'4" running machines. The natural evolution of the 3rd man up was to totally nullify the effect of ruckmen at stoppages. You could have two midfielders competing for the ruck at a stoppage if all they are doing is acting as a launching pad for a 3rd man up from each team.
Aussie Rules has always been a game accessible for beanpoles and munchkins and every level between. That's a good thing to keep. |
Great point. _________________ kymbo |
|
|
|
|
Tannin
Can't remember
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Location: Huon Valley Tasmania
|
Post subject: | |
|
A good move which will improve the game.
And this:
kymbo5@yahoo.com.au wrote: | It was a bad day for Jordan Sniper Lewis. No third man up and a harder line on punching people in the stomach. His two best (and some argue only) attributes are being phased out. |
Exactly! _________________ �Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives! |
|
|
|
|
Raw Hammer
Joined: 11 Sep 2008 Location: The Gutter
|
Post subject: | |
|
Without third man up in 2011 Jordan Lewis doesn't feed Luke Ball the pill for the winning goal in the forward pocket. _________________ Est. 2002 |
|
|
|
|
neil
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 Location: Queensland
|
Post subject: | |
|
stui magpie wrote: | kymbo5@yahoo.com.au wrote: | WhyPhilWhy? wrote: | I don't understand the problem they are attempting to solve. |
It's at least two fold.
1. Protect the ruckman from injury caused by collisions they can't see and should have to expect.
2. Make it easier for the umpires to officiate the rucking contests including when ruckman are penalised for "blocking" the person trying to be third man up.
It's a good rule, kudos to the AFL. |
3 fold. To promote the role of ruckman and avoid the consequence of having teams of 6'4" running machines. The natural evolution of the 3rd man up was to totally nullify the effect of ruckmen at stoppages. You could have two midfielders competing for the ruck at a stoppage if all they are doing is acting as a launching pad for a 3rd man up from each team.
Aussie Rules has always been a game accessible for beanpoles and munchkins and every level between. That's a good thing to keep. |
Very good points _________________ Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum |
|
|
|
|
stoliboy
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Sydney, NSW
|
Post subject: | |
|
AFL had to wait until Hawthorn had had their chance at four premierships in a row. They can change the rule now.
With Collingwood they changed the interchange rule straight after we won the flag. _________________ Sydney Collingwood Supporters Club
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/ |
|
|
|
|
MJ23
Joined: 28 Feb 2011 Location: Sydney
|
Post subject: | |
|
First time in a long long time a rule change does not disadvantage us.
Looking at the stats, we dont have any player in the top 30 for 3rd man up hit outs.
I actually think if Grundy can play the full season he could make the AA team with this rule now in place. _________________ "Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan |
|
|
|
|
|