Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Gubby Allen accepts 12-month anti-doping ban (and resigns)

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12 ... 22, 23, 24  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Member 7167 Leo

"What Good Fortune For Governments That The People Do Not Think" - Adolf Hitler.


Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Location: The Collibran Hideout

PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 8:43 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

watt price tully wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:
watt price tully wrote:
Delay by ASADA re the outcomes of the case:

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/asada-delay-on-lachie-whitfield-affair-20161107-gsk193.html


I thought ASADA had nothing to do with the Case?

That what the AFL Said Rolling Eyes

Wrote by Caro again. Where is she getting all this Info


From the inside.


From the inside of a toilet booth.

As normal the AFL showing how decisive they are just like they have done with everything else including the Jobe Watson / Brownnlow medal issue.

_________________
Now Retired - Every Day Is A Saturday
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
robevpau1 Cancer



Joined: 25 Mar 2008


PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 11:41 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

An interesting development ..... https://twitter.com/TomBrowne7
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
robevpau1 Cancer



Joined: 25 Mar 2008


PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 11:42 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

robevpau1 wrote:
An interesting development ..... seems to be a lack of evidence.https://twitter.com/TomBrowne7
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
robevpau1 Cancer



Joined: 25 Mar 2008


PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 3:59 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/more-news/asada-has-hit-back-at-claims-it-is-taking-too-long-on-the-lachie-whitfield-investigation/news-story/a669a6a21b7944fe12d79dd4730000bc

Seems ASADA requires more than the current evidence provided by the AFL - and it appears that the AFL has provided all it has. Gubby is also questioning the credibility of all evidence tendered by Whitfield's former partner. Has been stated that there was no drug test scheduled at the time for Whitfield. What a shemozzle!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Member 7167 Leo

"What Good Fortune For Governments That The People Do Not Think" - Adolf Hitler.


Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Location: The Collibran Hideout

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 4:58 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Let us also consider that this has been going on since May 2015. How long do Asada and the AFL need to asses the situation to ascertain if there is a case to answer.

The next thing that SHOULD be investigated is the competency of both organisations.

_________________
Now Retired - Every Day Is A Saturday
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
burnsy17 Virgo



Joined: 10 Aug 2003


PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 5:14 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a feeling that he will get 2 years.... likewise Lambert and Whitfield....

I also have a feeling that Roos has been sounded out by his mate Pert....

_________________
Beware the swooping Magpie.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Member 7167 Leo

"What Good Fortune For Governments That The People Do Not Think" - Adolf Hitler.


Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Location: The Collibran Hideout

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:36 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

burnsy17 wrote:
I have a feeling that he will get 2 years.... likewise Lambert and Whitfield....

I also have a feeling that Roos has been sounded out by his mate Pert....



Seeing that there seems to be a lack of evidence and much of it is based upon the claims of a jilted girlfriend who would potentially make a poor witness in any court, on what basis do you hold that opinion?

Three individuals careers and financial status could be severely damaged by this case. You would certainly want some irrefutable evidence to convict them.

_________________
Now Retired - Every Day Is A Saturday
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 8:37 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Member 7167 wrote:
burnsy17 wrote:
I have a feeling that he will get 2 years.... likewise Lambert and Whitfield....

I also have a feeling that Roos has been sounded out by his mate Pert....



Seeing that there seems to be a lack of evidence and much of it is based upon the claims of a jilted girlfriend who would potentially make a poor witness in any court, on what basis do you hold that opinion?

Three individuals careers and financial status could be severely damaged by this case. You would certainly want some irrefutable evidence to convict them.


Much depends on what was on those deleted text messages I guess.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
FLAGPIES 



Joined: 19 Aug 2008


PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 8:55 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Member 7167 wrote:
burnsy17 wrote:
I have a feeling that he will get 2 years.... likewise Lambert and Whitfield....

I also have a feeling that Roos has been sounded out by his mate Pert....



Seeing that there seems to be a lack of evidence and much of it is based upon the claims of a jilted girlfriend who would potentially make a poor witness in any court, on what basis do you hold that opinion?

Three individuals careers and financial status could be severely damaged by this case. You would certainly want some irrefutable evidence to convict them.


Exactly M 7176!!!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
burnsy17 Virgo



Joined: 10 Aug 2003


PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:10 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a hunch.....
_________________
Beware the swooping Magpie.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
FLAGPIES 



Joined: 19 Aug 2008


PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:28 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

burnsy17 wrote:
Just a hunch.....


Hunch about Roos, Gubby or Both Burnsy17?

Sounds more like inside info rather than a Hunch..😀
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:29 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes it sounds like it to me too, FLAGPIES.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
burnsy17 Virgo



Joined: 10 Aug 2003


PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:39 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a guess mate - I think the club is preparing to lose Gubby and my thoughts are that Pert has probably sounded out Roos as the replacement....

I also think it may be a possibility that some at the club are blaming others for the recruitment of Gubby in the first place....

But what would I know! 😀

_________________
Beware the swooping Magpie.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
FLAGPIES 



Joined: 19 Aug 2008


PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:01 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

burnsy17 wrote:
Just a guess mate - I think the club is preparing to lose Gubby and my thoughts are that Pert has probably sounded out Roos as the replacement....

I also think it may be a possibility that some at the club are blaming others for the recruitment of Gubby in the first place....

But what would I know! 😀


I reckon quite a lot burnsy!! 😀😀

Pert is the problem from what I can gather!!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:11 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

RudeBoy wrote:
Member 7167 wrote:
burnsy17 wrote:
I have a feeling that he will get 2 years.... likewise Lambert and Whitfield....

I also have a feeling that Roos has been sounded out by his mate Pert....



Seeing that there seems to be a lack of evidence and much of it is based upon the claims of a jilted girlfriend who would potentially make a poor witness in any court, on what basis do you hold that opinion?

Three individuals careers and financial status could be severely damaged by this case. You would certainly want some irrefutable evidence to convict them.


Much depends on what was on those deleted text messages I guess.


What was on them and Did they Find Them?

_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12 ... 22, 23, 24  Next
Page 11 of 24   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group