View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
Post subject: | |
|
geez I'd struggle to like him! _________________ Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote: | geez I'd struggle to like him! |
Frankie... this isn't Facebook, my good man.
This is about making finals and winning premierships.
So unless he's drowning kittens in the creek in his spare time, then he is welcome aboard to kick some clutch goals from the endless supply of slops that hit the deck in our F50. _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007 Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
piedys wrote: | FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote: | geez I'd struggle to like him! |
Frankie... this isn't Facebook, my good man.
This is about making finals and winning premierships.
So unless he's drowning kittens in the creek in his spare time, then he is welcome aboard to kick some clutch goals from the endless supply of slops that hit the deck in our F50. |
Especially if he is drowning kittens in the creek in his spare time. We need some hardness. _________________ Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
Post subject: | |
|
inxs88 wrote: | Nathan Brown is an abomination. Mr defensive...... deplorable..... and selfish.... 2 kicks and takes no offensive responsibility. Like we are playing with 21 every week. Go take that North Melbourne offer! |
this is not a smart post in my opinion. yet antoehr week where their central big had no impact on the game. week in week out, this is what Brown does. and it is what he should be doing. he is dependable back there at doing a job and that is what he is paid to do. we never complained that Presti never got any touches. _________________ Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
Piesnchess
piesnchess
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
BOOMER, come on down. ! LOL _________________ Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb. |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Mugwump wrote: | piedys wrote: | FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote: | geez I'd struggle to like him! |
Frankie... this isn't Facebook, my good man.
This is about making finals and winning premierships.
So unless he's drowning kittens in the creek in his spare time, then he is welcome aboard to kick some clutch goals from the endless supply of slops that hit the deck in our F50. |
Especially if he is drowning kittens in the creek in his spare time. We need some hardness. |
Only Geelong based kittens though, and that has to wait until they mangle those pox Whoreks in week one of finals... _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
Tannin
Can't remember
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Location: Huon Valley Tasmania
|
Post subject: | |
|
We already have two excellent small forwards, Elliott and Fasolo. Do we need three?
Hell yes!
Most weeks we can't get even <i>one</i> of our quality smalls onto the park, let alone both of them at the same time.
Just get Boomer.
OK, he's getting old and will probably only be good for 18 or 19 games a year, but that's still 10 games more than Fasolo and Elliott both put together.
Just get him.
He won't be keeping a talented kid out of the side. If the kid can't even get selected ahead of a 39-year-old cast off from the Pauperoos, then he ain't talented enough to play seniors.
Just do it. _________________ �Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives! |
|
|
|
|
Presti35
Dick Lee for Legend Status
Joined: 05 Oct 2001 Location: London, England
|
Post subject: | |
|
Again, I'd just love to see him play against North and to see the COLL next to his name as the player with most games played.
And it'd really give North fans the shits.
These are not sentimental reasons... I dont think.... are they? _________________ A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned! |
|
|
|
|
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
Post subject: | |
|
piedys wrote: | FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote: | geez I'd struggle to like him! |
Frankie... this isn't Facebook, my good man.
This is about making finals and winning premierships.
So unless he's drowning kittens in the creek in his spare time, then he is welcome aboard to kick some clutch goals from the endless supply of slops that hit the deck in our F50. |
Ha, fair point but personal prejudice aside, I can't see his value in a team I don't believe will challenge for a couple of years at least. I think we'll make finals next year without him and by the time we're ready to go the next step he'll be finished. I'd rather we punted on a rookie _________________ Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
Piesnchess
piesnchess
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
Boomer is a very deadly kick for goal, oh, but of course, we really don't need great kicks for goal,now do we . ?????? LOL. _________________ Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb. |
|
|
|
|
WhyPhilWhy?
WhyPhilWhy?
Joined: 09 Oct 2001 Location: Location: Location:
|
Post subject: | |
|
There is one particular kick for goal of Boomer's, from the goal square, that I remember particularly fondly. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
Tannin wrote: | We already have two excellent small forwards, Elliott and Fasolo. Do we need three?
Hell yes!
Most weeks we can't get even <i>one</i> of our quality smalls onto the park, let alone both of them at the same time.
Just get Boomer.
OK, he's getting old and will probably only be good for 18 or 19 games a year, but that's still 10 games more than Fasolo and Elliott both put together.
Just get him.
He won't be keeping a talented kid out of the side. If the kid can't even get selected ahead of a 39-year-old cast off from the Pauperoos, then he ain't talented enough to play seniors.
Just do it. |
yep _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
Stevo75
Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Location: Bendigo
|
Post subject: | |
|
No from me. Would rather see Crocker getting a game. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote: | geez I'd struggle to like him! |
Had that trouble with varcoe! I learnt to LOVE him!! All is forgiven! _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote: | piedys wrote: | FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote: | geez I'd struggle to like him! |
Frankie... this isn't Facebook, my good man.
This is about making finals and winning premierships.
So unless he's drowning kittens in the creek in his spare time, then he is welcome aboard to kick some clutch goals from the endless supply of slops that hit the deck in our F50. |
Ha, fair point but personal prejudice aside, I can't see his value in a team I don't believe will challenge for a couple of years at least. I think we'll make finals next year without him and by the time we're ready to go the next step he'll be finished. I'd rather we punted on a rookie |
Mate all for the youth policy, it is slowly starting to show some fruit.
However, given that we've just lost MaCaff, Toovs, Swan and Daddy's little Princess in the last week or so, and there's no need to tell you how much experience just walked out the door never to return, I think we can treat ourselves to at least one wise old head to replace another. And they've effectively just given us Boomer on a platter with ribbons and streamers. _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
|