|
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
Post subject: | |
|
First out of the current side is clearly Phillips! Phillips for Adams.
It's less clear who is the next one to make way. _________________ Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
Piesnchess
piesnchess
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
WE simply cannot win this game, we just don't have the necessary ammo, if Fasolo and Taylor adams were playing, and Jamie Elliott, wed be in with a shot, but not now. Best we can hope for is being competitive, have a red hot go, and go down by around 20 points or so. _________________ Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb. |
|
|
|
|
mattys123
Joined: 07 Jul 2009 Location: Narre Warren, VIC
|
Post subject: | |
|
Fasolo and Adams will play.
But I do agree, can't see us winning this game, even if they do come back, GWS are the real deal now, as we aren't, simple. |
|
|
|
|
MatthewBoydFanClub
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: Elwood
|
Post subject: | |
|
Might be a tall order for Fasolo to be recalled after just getting back into training. Also who does he replace? The obvious ones are White for Cox. Adams for Phillips.
Then it gets harder. Aish has to stay in the side. Smith's been playing well. Blair won't go out of the side. Williams has been the least performed of the backmen, but his replacement ought to be Marsh, not Fasolo.
A possibility would be replacing Cox with Fasolo, but that gives us a smaller forward line. For once this season we have some selection headaches to decide our best 22 to take on GWS. |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013 Location: WA
|
Post subject: | |
|
$9 with $ back if we lose and were leading at any break is value. _________________ All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
Millane42
Joined: 18 Aug 2000 Location: Sydney
|
Post subject: | |
|
we need a smaller forward line it's been raining for 2 days up here with showers set to continue. We need in and under extractors. _________________ Most of my favourite bands start with "M" - Mars Volta, Mastodon, Megadeth, Metallica, Midnight Oil, Misfits...except King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard ~ |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
COLLINGWOOD TEAM
IN: Alex Fasolo, Brent Macaffer, Jesse White, Taylor Adams, Jonathon Marsh
OUT: Tyson Goldsack (omit), Tom Phillips (omit), Marley Williams (omit), Levi Greenwood (managed), Mason Cox (managed)
B: Jonathon Marsh, Nathan Brown, Jeremy Howe
HB: Taylor Adams, Ben Reid, Ben Sinclair
C: Steele Sidebottom, Adam Treloar, James Aish
HF: Alex Fasolo, Travis Cloke, Travis Varcoe
F: Darcy Moore, Jesse White, Jarryd Blair
Foll: Brodie Grundy, Scott Pendlebury, Jack Crisp
Int: Jordan De Goey, Brent Macaffer, Brayden Maynard, Josh Smith
Emg: Tyson Goldsack, Jarrod Witts, Marley Williams
Best team we've had in all year. Pies by 18 points! |
|
|
|
|
mattys123
Joined: 07 Jul 2009 Location: Narre Warren, VIC
|
Post subject: | |
|
5 changes, with 2 players being managed 2 weeks after a bye.
Ok then. |
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007 Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
Surprised to see the Sack omitted. I thought he was in our top 5-8 players last Sat. Though I guess his opponent, Silvagni, got a fair bit of it too, so perhaps that explains it. A 150 game player like Goldie should have pulverised a newbie.
On paper that side looks damn strong. But it is probably underdone, too. _________________ Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
MatthewBoydFanClub
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: Elwood
|
Post subject: | |
|
While I think Goldsack is a little bit stiff to be omitted I do think this is the best team we could have picked. Fasolo could be a little underdone, but he's done enough during the year to deserve to get back into the team. We'll give it our best shot against GWS and I like the defensive pressure we applied against Carlton. But GWS is a much better team than Carlton. This is going to be a very tough match to win.
Last edited by MatthewBoydFanClub on Thu Jul 07, 2016 7:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Location: Bendigo
|
Post subject: | |
|
Caffs last chance to show he still offers something at senior level? Think I'd prefer Greenwood not be managed this week.
Harsh on Sack and Williams but it shows that if you don't bring it there'll be a price to pay.
Would prefer guys returning from injury to do so via the VFL, especially soft tissue injuries like Adams, but overall a better looking team on paper, if underdone. |
|
|
|
|
Raw Hammer
Joined: 11 Sep 2008 Location: The Gutter
|
Post subject: | |
|
Wow, that back 6 is seriously a revolving door. Have 6 played together at the sometime for more than a week??? _________________ Est. 2002 |
|
|
|
|
MatthewBoydFanClub
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: Elwood
|
Post subject: | |
|
jackcass wrote: | Caffs last chance to show he still offers something at senior level? Think I'd prefer Greenwood not be managed this week.
Harsh on Sack and Williams but it shows that if you don't bring it there'll be a price to pay.
Would prefer guys returning from injury to do so via the VFL, especially soft tissue injuries like Adams, but overall a better looking team on paper, if underdone. |
Adams is definitely ready to play. Shown enough at training the last two weeks to demonstrate he is ready to play. Doesn't mean his hamstring won't go again, but that could happen anyway. To me Fasolo is the unknown quantity. He could be OK, maybe not, but sometimes you need to take risks. Greenwood will benefit from the rest. He had no real opponent anyway. Macaffer deserves his chance. He could very well be playing for his career so I hope he plays well. I doubt if Greenwood and Macaffer could play in the same team so another benefit in giving Greenwood a rest. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Smacks of desperation rushing Adams and Fasolo back. Really, to what purpose? They can't be match fit. |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013 Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | Smacks of desperation rushing Adams and Fasolo back. Really, to what purpose? They can't be match fit. |
Just a stab in the dark - I'm guessing trying to 'save ones coaching career' is the answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|