View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
funkster05
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
Post subject: ULTIMATE SUMMARY OF TRADE PERIOD | |
|
Hey all, here is a club by club summary of the trade period that I put together tonight (took me a few hours but got there in the end).
It lists each trade made by each club (including an explanation of the 3 way deals), the net gains and losses, and also the current picks as they stand for the upcoming National Draft.
Cheers and I hope you enjoy.
ADELAIDE
Trades:
1. Traded Pick 29 and 45 to Sydney for Scott Stevens and Pick 31.
Net Gains:
• Scott Stevens;
• Pick 31.
Net Loss:
• Pick 29:
• Pick 45
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 14 (1st Round)
• 31 (2nd Round)
• 61 (4th Round)
• 77 (5th Round)
BRISBANE
Trades:
1. Traded Jason Gram to St.Kilda for Pick 23
Net Gains:
• Pick 23
Net Loss:
• Jason Gram
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 18 (1st Round)
• 23 (2nd Round)
• 33 (2nd Round)
• 49 (3rd Round)
• 65 (4th Round)
• 81 (5th Round)
CARLTON
Trades:
1. Matthew Allan to Essendon for Pick 60;
2. Corey McKernan to Kangaroos for David Teague and Digby Morrell;
3. Pick 35 to Collingwood for Heath Scotland;
4. Pick 51 to Hawthorn for Daniel Harford and Brett Johnson;
5. Justin Murphy to Essendon for Cory McGrath;
6. Simon Beaumont to Hawthorn in 3 way deal that netted David Clarke from Geelong
• Beaumont (Carl) to Hawthorn, David Loates (Haw) to Geelong, David Clarke (Geel) to Carlton
Net Gains:
• Daniel Harford;
• Brett Johnson;
• Heath Scotland;
• David Teague;
• Digby Morrell;
• Cory McGrath;
• David Clarke;
• Pick 60.
• Nick Stevens if available in Pre-Season Draft?
Net Loss:
• Simon Beaumont;
• Matthew Allan;
• Justin Murphy;
• Corey McKernan;
• Pick 35;
• Pick 51
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 2 (1st Round)
• 60 (4th Round)
• 67 (5th Round)
COLLINGWOOD
Trades:
1. Heath Scotland to Carlton for Pick 35
Net Gain:
• Pick 35
Net Loss:
• Heath Scotland
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 17 (1st Round)
• 32 (2nd Round – will be utilized for Brayden Shaw under Father/son rule)
• 35 (2nd Round)
• 48 (3rd Round – will be utilized for Heath Shaw under Father/son rule)
• 64th (4th Round)
• 80 (5th Round).
ESSENDON
Trades:
1. Cory McGrath traded to Carlton for Justin Murphy
2. Pick 60 to Carlton for Matthew Allan
3. Danny Jacobs to Hawthorn for Pick 6 and Mark Alvey as part of 3 way deal:
• Western Bulldogs traded pick 6 (gained from Richmond by trading Nathan Brown) and Mark Alvey to Hawthorn for unknown rookie Lochlan Veale, Hawthorn trades Alvey and Pick 6 to Essendon for Danny Jacobs:
Net Gains:
• Pick 6
• Justin Murphy;
• Matthew Allan;
• Mark Alvey:
Net Losses:
• Danny Jacobs;
• Cory McGrath
• Pick 60.
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 6 (1st Round)
• 13 (1st Round
• 28 (2nd Round)
• 44 (3rd Round)
• 76 (5th Round)
FREMANTLE:
Trades:
1. Trent Croad to Hawthorn for Pick 10;
2. Steven Koops to Western Bulldogs for Pick 19;
Net Gains:
• Pick 10;
• Pick 19;
Net Losses;
• Trent Croad;
• Steven Koops;
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 10 (1st Round)
• 12 (1st Round)
• 19 (2nd Round)
• 27 (2nd Round)
• 43 (3rd Round)
• 59 (4th Round)
• 75 (5th Round).
GEELONG
Trades:
1. David Clarke to Carlton for David Loates (as part of 3 way trade deal involving Hawthorn, refer above);
2. Complicated multi way deal;
a. Peter Street traded to Western Bulldogs for Pick 20 (acquired by Bulldogs for Nathan Brown from Richmond who acquired that pick from Melbourne for Ben Holland);
b. Pick 20 on traded to West Coast for David Haynes and Pick 42
Net Gains:
• David Loates;
• David Haynes;
Net Loss;
• Peter Street;
• David Clarke;
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 7 (1st Round)
• 22 (2nd Round)
• 38 (3rd Round – will be utilized to draft Mark Blake under Father/son rule);
• 42 (3rd Round)
• 54 (4th Round)
• 70 (5th Round).
HAWTHORN:
Trades:
1. Pick 10 to Fremantle for Trent Croad:
2. Brett Johnson and Daniel Harford to Carlton for Pick 51;
3. David Loates to Geelong for Simon Beaumont (via Carlton in 3 way deal discussed above);
4. Lochlan Veale for Pick 6 and Mark Alvey, both on-traded to Essendon for Danny Jacobs;
Net Gains:
• Trent Croad;
• Simon Beaumont;
• Danny Jacobs;
Net Losses:
• Pick 10;
• David Loates;
• Daniel Harford;
• Brett Johnson;
• Jade Rawlings* (not traded to a club but will most likely enter pre-season draft);
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 25 (2nd Round)
• 41 (3rd Round)
• 57 (4th Round)
• 73 (5th Round)
KANGAROOS:
Trades:
1. David Teague and Digby Morrell to Carlton for Corey McKernan
Net Gains:
• Corey McKernan
Net Loss;
• Digby Morrell
• David Teague
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 9 (1st Round);
• 24 (2nd Round)
• 40 (3rd Round)
• 56 (4th Round)
• 72 (5th Round)
MELBOURNE:
Trades:
1. Pick 20 to Richmond for Ben Holland.
Net Gain:
• Ben Holland
Net Loss:
• Pick 20;
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 3 (1st Round)
• 5 (1st Round)
• 36 (3rd Round)
• 52 (4th Round)
• 68 (5th Round)
PORT ADELAIDE
Trades:
1. Brent Guerra to St.Kilda for Pick 39
2. Adam Morgan to Western Bulldogs for Pick 34
Net Gains:
• Pick 34
• Pick 39
Net Loss:
• Brent Guerra;
• Adam Morgan;
• Nick Stevens* (not traded by club but will most likely enter pre-season draft and be picked up by Carlton);
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 15 (1st Round)
• 30 (2nd Round)
• 34 (3rd Round)
• 39 (3rd Round)
• 46 (3rd round)
• 62 (4th Round)
• 78 (5th Round)
RICHMOND:
Trades:
1. Ben Holland to Melbourne for Pick 20;
2. Pick 6 and 20 to Bulldogs for Nathan Brown
Net Gains:
• Nathan Brown:
Net Loss:
• Ben Holland:
• Pick 6;
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 21 (2nd Round)
• 37 (3rd Round)
• 53 (4th Round)
• 69 (5th Round).
ST.KILDA
Trades:
1. Pick 23 to Brisbane for Jason Gram;
2. Pick 39 to Port Adelaide for Brent Guerra;
Net Gains:
• Jason Gram;
• Brent Guerra;
Net Loss:
• Pick 23;
• Pick 39;
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 8 (1st Round)
• 55 (4th Round)
• 71 (5th Round)
SYDNEY:
Trades:
1. Scott Stevens + Pick 31 to Adelaide for Pick 29 and 45;
Net Gains:
• Pick 29 and 45;
Net Loss:
• Scott Stevens:
• Pick 31;
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 16 (1st Round);
• 29 (2nd Round);
• 45 (3rd Round) ;
• 47 (3rd Round)
• 63 (4th Round)
• 79 (5th Round)
WESTERN BULLDOGS;
Trades:
1. Nathan Brown to Richmond for Pick 6 and 20;
2. Pick 6 and Mark Alvey to Hawthorn for Lochlan Veale;
3. Pick 20 to Geelong for Peter Street;
4. Pick 19 to Fremantle for Steven Koops;
5. Pick 34 to Port Adelaide for Adam Morgan:
Net Gains:
• Lochlan Veale;
• Peter Street;
• Steven Koops;
• Adam Morgan;
• Jade Rawlings? If available in Pre-Season draft;
Net Loss:
• Nathan Brown;
• Pick 19;
• Pick 34;
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 1 (1st Round)
• 4 (1st Round)
• 50 (4th Round)
• 66 (5th Round)
WEST COAST:
Trades:
1. David Haynes + Pick 42 to Geelong for Pick 20;
Net Gains:
• Pick 20;
Net Loss:
• David Haynes;
• Pick 42;
Current Picks in 2004 National Draft:
• 11 (1st Round)
• 20 (2nd Round)
• 26 (2nd Round)
• 58 (4th Round)
• 64 (5th Round). |
|
|
|
|
MagpieMad
One in, All in!!
Joined: 15 Jan 2001 Location: -37.798563,144.996641
|
Post subject: | |
|
Brilliant! thnx funkster dewd. _________________ Pain heals, Chicks dig scars, Glory..... lasts forever! |
|
|
|
|
AGE
Joined: 06 Sep 2002 Location: Docking Bay 94
|
Post subject: | |
|
Thanks funkster. Must have taken you ages! I was waiting for someone to post a full list.
After comparing everyone, in the end we came out the biggest losers. 1 trade, 1 "gain"(if you call a draft pick a gain) |
|
|
|
|
labrooy
Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Location: Toowoomba, Qld
|
Post subject: | |
|
Lets wait until the drafts are completed before deciding if we are losers or not. |
|
|
|
|
AGE
Joined: 06 Sep 2002 Location: Docking Bay 94
|
Post subject: | |
|
labroy, trades were completed yesterday @ 2pm. That's what I was refering to.
So if you can tell me that a team that unloads 5 players and gains 7 experienced players is worse than our 1 trade for a draft pick, well then yep we had a good trade week. |
|
|
|
|
labrooy
Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Location: Toowoomba, Qld
|
Post subject: | |
|
Carlton unloaded 5 useless players and got 7 average players. They may pick up a quality player in the draft and pre-season draft. Does that make them a power team?
All we did was take up Scotland's request to be traded. Had Didak agreed to go to Port we would have picked up Stevens. Would that have stopped us becoming the biggest losers?
No-one wants to make Collingwood stronger. They know we are not far short of winning a GF with a young list, so why give us the player to take it that one step further.
Calling Collingwood losers because we weren't able to trade ignores so many factors. The period involves not just trades but the two drafts as well. As I said before lets wait until it is all complete before making snap judgements. |
|
|
|
|
Harvey
Joined: 15 Oct 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
right on labrooy. we didn't make alot of trades because we didn't need to. just look at brisbane, they only made one trade for a draft pick and can u call them losers? stevens would have being a bonus but not compulsory
N e way we'll be looking forward to a new quality recruit next season by the name of Tarks |
|
|
|
|
MOTR
Joined: 25 Apr 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
I think we did good. So we missed out on Stevens, too bad. This Sunday feels much better knowing Didak and Presti will be running out next year in the black and white.
Scotland is a loss, but not that much of a loss. O.K. he can kick on both sides of his body, but he isn't overly quick and he hasn't convinced me he has the vision to break a game apart.
If he hasn't got what it takes to win a permanent spot in the Collingwood midfield what makes anyone think he has what it takes to hold his nerve and come up with the play that wins a premiership. Let him go and swim in the shallow end of the pool, if that's what he wants.
At the end of the day those in charge have more faith in Judkins with pick 35 than they have in Scotland. _________________ Be Staunch, Be Proud, Be Collingwood |
|
|
|
|
Lazza
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
"If you are not improving you are going backwards."
Wise words indeed brother Greg. I shudder to think that Colingwood is totally satisfied with our current list and will now sit on their hands. If that is true, we are stuffed as ALL the other teams will keep topping up & improving. God, I hope that they recruit some experienced players (ruckman/defenders) in the up coming drafts.
Lazza |
|
|
|
|
Blanch
Joined: 01 Jul 2002 Location: Back in Perth!
|
Post subject: | |
|
And I would shudder to think the list we have doesn't have improvement in it. The improvement will come from within the current playing list. _________________ My oxygen is Collingwood. Without it I die.
All WA Magpies join the Western Magpies now:
http://www.westernmagpies.com
(At least go and sign the guestbook). |
|
|
|
|
MOTR
Joined: 25 Apr 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
I don't understand why people can't comprehend such a simple point. Our list has more potential for improvement than any of our immediate threats. Brisbane will come back to the field next year and we'll be in the best position to take over. _________________ Be Staunch, Be Proud, Be Collingwood |
|
|
|
|
commonwombat
commonwombat
Joined: 12 Jul 2003 Location: sydney/s.africa
|
Post subject: | |
|
Realistically, the jury will have to be out until the season is well under way. Then some sort of judgement can be made.
Our list is a good one, but only the blindly optimistic would fail to acknowledge that some glaring gaps have been shown and that we are still short of a premiership side.
Greg is totally correct in his analogy that failure to progress is going backwards. Purely relying on developemnt of youth is a risky strategy. There are no guarantees as to who, how many and how far they may progress.
We have been conservative however we did not need to go mad either. Re the Stevens deal, Didak was a no go but the likes of McGough, Scotland, Cole and Lonie, whilst useful, could be classified as expendable. _________________ he's an animal, what can u expect!!! |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
MOTR wrote: | Our list has more potential for improvement than any of our immediate threats. Brisbane will come back to the field next year and we'll be in the best position to take over. |
Yes it does. Beware of St.Kilda though. I'm afraid I don't share your optimistic view of Brisbane taking a slide next year. If broken ribs, wonky knees and finishing 3rd can't keep them from a premiership, then i'm afraid it will take a MAJOR improvement from within our list, both physically and mentally for us to de-throne the Bears.
Dyso _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
Harvey
Joined: 15 Oct 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
commonwombat wrote: | Purely relying on developemnt of youth is a risky strategy. There are no guarantees as to who, how many and how far they may progress.
|
r u saying trading all our young guns/draft picks for has being players is not a risky strategy? if thats the case, then we should go the way of adelaide and go find a ronnie burns or wayne carey. there are no garantees that traded experienced players will do well in other teams either. look at trent croad for instance. was he worth the pick 1?
and as for progressing, we are. every year we are drafting young players with the potential to be the next fraser, bucks or tarrant. premiership teams come from the draft, not from other clubs |
|
|
|
|
|