| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Harvey
Joined: 15 Oct 2003
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| Big T wrote: | | GWS would not have cap space for beams |
I'm sure they will if they give us Treloar and we offer to help pay the first year of Beams' contract like we did for Heath. |
|
|
|
 |
swoop42 
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Location: The 18
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Griffen won't be playing for peanuts.
They missed out on Franklin last year.
Not so sure about that.
_________________
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
It shows that Brisbane's first offer was laughable, as we all knew it was. Their second deal is still inadequate and not one we should accept. Give them till tomorrow to get serious and then open it up to other clubs. If Beams is serious about being near his father he'll deal with the Suns. If that was just rubbish he can go anywhere, I really don't want him to stay even if he wanted to re-sign.
_________________
Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Harvey wrote: | | Big T wrote: | | GWS would not have cap space for beams |
I'm sure they will if they give us Treloar and we offer to help pay the first year of Beams' contract like we did for Heath. |
i'd be surprised if they did not have cap space. heck of a lot of youngsters on the list.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
Domesticated_Ape 
Joined: 01 Oct 2012
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| AN_Inkling wrote: | | It shows that Brisbane's first offer was laughable, as we all knew it was. Their second deal is still inadequate and not one we should accept. Give them till tomorrow to get serious and then open it up to other clubs. If Beams is serious about being near his father he'll deal with the Suns. If that was just rubbish he can go anywhere, I really don't want him to stay even if he wanted to re-sign. |
I'm leaning that way too, but I'd still prefer to keep him than agree to a trade that sees us only get about 70% of his value, which is what I think Brisbanes first two picks offer. |
|
|
|
|
Damien 
Me Noah & Flynn @ the G
Joined: 21 Jan 1999
Location: Croydon Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Domesticated_Ape wrote: | | AN_Inkling wrote: | | It shows that Brisbane's first offer was laughable, as we all knew it was. Their second deal is still inadequate and not one we should accept. Give them till tomorrow to get serious and then open it up to other clubs. If Beams is serious about being near his father he'll deal with the Suns. If that was just rubbish he can go anywhere, I really don't want him to stay even if he wanted to re-sign. |
I'm leaning that way too, but I'd still prefer to keep him than agree to a trade that sees us only get about 70% of his value, which is what I think Brisbanes first two picks offer. |
Yes. And once our 'deadline' has passed there is nothing to stop them still coming to us with their tail between their legs and upping their offer if they seriously want their man before the official deadline. They could have a few more suitors to compete with by then. The more I think about the deadline we put in place the more I think it was a tactical master stroke by our people. Well done Pies.
_________________
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
