Buckley may not play

[Joel]

The word is Buckley won't play. Heard it on 10 news, it is bad luck but gives us another chance to smash the old belief that Collingwood can't play without Buckley. CARN PIES!!!

JDF

[Danzy Rocks!!!]

we can win without Bucks anyway.

I LOVE DANNY ROACH 4 EVA AND EVA

[CQ]

yeah we can win without him, BUT why isn't he playing? they said his injury was so unserious that he didnt even need a scan or whatever, THEREFORE 2 and a half weeks later, he should be right. i wonder why.....

249

[Kristin5]

SHITTTTTTTTT!
Although I know we can win without him (and we proved it against Melbourne), I'm having "Nath withdrawals" and I'm not sure I can go much longer without him - hopefully he'll be on The Footy Show tonight (that might tide me over for a few more days)! LOL..LOL..LOL..

Anyway, I hope the news reports are wrong, cos I looooooove watching him moooooooove!!!

[Joel]

I would rather Buckley rested than potentially re injuring his injury.

JDF

[This message has been edited by Joel (edited 21 June 2001).]

[Danzy Rocks!!!]

Dan - more than 81 pts. lol
I'd say...hmmm, definately alot.

I LOVE DANNY ROACH 4 EVA AND EVA

[Kristin5]

I was just about to congratulate you, but you got in first!

I'll say it anyway - CONGRATULATIONS, you're a bloody marvel! LOL..LOL..

[AlfAndrews]

Congratulations to piesPremiers2001 for correctly predicting an 81 point win.

You are unquestionably a legend of the highest order.

I tipped the Weagles to win, by the way. Wouldn't I have looked clever if they'd caused an upset!!! And don't I look a right twit now!!!

And what's more ... I'm loving it!!!!!!!!!

**floreat pica**

[Danzy Rocks!!!]

you were right Dan ... again. lol
i was tipping a 104 point win. lol
close enough tho.

I LOVE DANNY ROACH 4 EVA AND EVA