View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
swoop42 wrote: | AN_Inkling wrote: | swoop42 wrote: | Blair was credited with 3 tackles against North.
Beams had 8.
Blair was credited with one 1%.
Maxwell had 7. |
Blair had 46 pressure acts apparently. |
Yet only 3 tackles and one 1%.
Sounds like a worthless stat to me tbh. |
I'm not actually sure what it is. Just saw someone else quote it . _________________ Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
AN_Inkling wrote: | John Wren wrote: | jt in the starting 18. there is bench cover for forwards/backs (fas), mids (ball) and talls (witts). possibly langdon to be the sub? |
Hopefully not, it's a better balanced defense with him there, and the Bombers have a couple of dangerous smaller types.
Ball can surely not be sub again. Would be disappointed.
Fas would have been the obvious one except that he played very well last week.
Witts? Bombers are only playing one ruck, we don't need two. It's not something we've done in the past, but possible. The other option is: in Dwyer, out Witts and Dwyer is sub. Probably my preferred option, in that we'd actually have a sub that can make an impact. |
i thought only named bench players can be nominated as sub. and, it'd make sense if - as everyone is pointing out - langdon needed a rest. it's a way to ease him out without dropping him. _________________ Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
EBB
Joined: 26 Apr 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
John Wren wrote: | AN_Inkling wrote: | John Wren wrote: | jt in the starting 18. there is bench cover for forwards/backs (fas), mids (ball) and talls (witts). possibly langdon to be the sub? |
Hopefully not, it's a better balanced defense with him there, and the Bombers have a couple of dangerous smaller types.
Ball can surely not be sub again. Would be disappointed.
Fas would have been the obvious one except that he played very well last week.
Witts? Bombers are only playing one ruck, we don't need two. It's not something we've done in the past, but possible. The other option is: in Dwyer, out Witts and Dwyer is sub. Probably my preferred option, in that we'd actually have a sub that can make an impact. |
i thought only named bench players can be nominated as sub. and, it'd make sense if - as everyone is pointing out - langdon needed a rest. it's a way to ease him out without dropping him. | Funniest thing I've ever read in this thread. _________________ understanding stuff, with endeavour to overstand.. |
|
|
|
|
MagpieBat
Joined: 27 Nov 2010 Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
|
Post subject: | |
|
Dave The Man wrote: | Grundy as Anzac Medalist |
In 2018. |
|
|
|
|
MagpieBat
Joined: 27 Nov 2010 Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
|
Post subject: | |
|
AN_Inkling wrote: | swoop42 wrote: | AN_Inkling wrote: | swoop42 wrote: | Blair was credited with 3 tackles against North.
Beams had 8.
Blair was credited with one 1%.
Maxwell had 7. |
Blair had 46 pressure acts apparently. |
Yet only 3 tackles and one 1%.
Sounds like a worthless stat to me tbh. |
I'm not actually sure what it is. Just saw someone else quote it . |
Here is an article from 2011 that gives a good definition:
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/pressure-the-coaches-buzzword/story-e6frf9jf-1226025761152 |
|
|
|
|
woftam
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
Post subject: | |
|
MagpieBat wrote: | AN_Inkling wrote: | swoop42 wrote: | AN_Inkling wrote: | swoop42 wrote: | Blair was credited with 3 tackles against North.
Beams had 8.
Blair was credited with one 1%.
Maxwell had 7. |
Blair had 46 pressure acts apparently. |
Yet only 3 tackles and one 1%.
Sounds like a worthless stat to me tbh. |
I'm not actually sure what it is. Just saw someone else quote it . |
Here is an article from 2011 that gives a good definition:
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/pressure-the-coaches-buzzword/story-e6frf9jf-1226025761152 |
If Pendles & Tooves were our top scorers in pressure acts in our winning grand final team with 19 each, then 46 for Blair is a big number. No doubt his place in the team is a little dicey with good performances coming from others in the VFL. Blair will need to play well today. |
|
|
|
|
mattys123
Joined: 07 Jul 2009 Location: Narre Warren, VIC
|
Post subject: | |
|
That's the positive at the moment though, that 7-8 players running around for us today know they have to keep playing well or they might not be playing next week.
Competition for spots is now intense, and will only get even tougher overt the coming few weeks, and that should ensure a high level of performance and adherence from every one out there.
I'd be shocked if we lost this, utterly shocked.
Pies by 30. |
|
|
|
|
Podpicken
Joined: 28 Oct 2006
|
Post subject: | |
|
swoop42 wrote: | Blair was credited with 3 tackles against North.
Beams had 8.
Blair was credited with one 1%.
Maxwell had 7. |
5 tackles against Richmond, 6 against Geelong and forever fearless, always smacking in. I'll back the experts in Bucks and the coaching staff on this one I reckon Swoop. Respect your opinions but reckon we'll agree to disagree on it. Just don't think you can pin it all on stats - if so, I'd like to see stats for bumps, in and under desperation, locking the ball in, tapping it out, cutting off the lines for opposition players' to set up etc. _________________ Billy Picken, the great No. 25 in the sky! |
|
|
|
|
hermerl
Joined: 05 Jun 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
If we can cope with bombers pace early ( they have picked a very quick side) we will win well, if not it could get ugly |
|
|
|
|
neil
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 Location: Queensland
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies by 3 goals _________________ Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Location: Bendigo
|
Post subject: | |
|
John Wren wrote: | AN_Inkling wrote: | John Wren wrote: | jt in the starting 18. there is bench cover for forwards/backs (fas), mids (ball) and talls (witts). possibly langdon to be the sub? |
Hopefully not, it's a better balanced defense with him there, and the Bombers have a couple of dangerous smaller types.
Ball can surely not be sub again. Would be disappointed.
Fas would have been the obvious one except that he played very well last week.
Witts? Bombers are only playing one ruck, we don't need two. It's not something we've done in the past, but possible. The other option is: in Dwyer, out Witts and Dwyer is sub. Probably my preferred option, in that we'd actually have a sub that can make an impact. |
i thought only named bench players can be nominated as sub. and, it'd make sense if - as everyone is pointing out - langdon needed a rest. it's a way to ease him out without dropping him. |
That's right but it's the bench players in the final team lodged 30 minutes prior to the game, they can alter the squad any way they like up to that point. |
|
|
|
|
mattys123
Joined: 07 Jul 2009 Location: Narre Warren, VIC
|
Post subject: | |
|
SEN saying that Jobe might not play due to Gastro.
That really would give them the shits. |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
mattys123 wrote: | SEN saying that Jobe might not play due to Gastro.
That really would give them the shits. |
I just heard that as well. If Jobe doesn't end up playing we really should be expecting a strong win! _________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
Not sure if it's already been mentioned but I'm just watching some of last years game on Fox Footy and I'm struck by the number of changes to our team from last time.
Of the ones I've seen, out are:
Hudson
Shaw
Reid
Brown
Lynch
Seedsman
Thomas
Russell
Clarke
That's a fair chunk of players in 12 months. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Skids
Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175
|
Post subject: | |
|
Yes, but look at the INs Stui
Beams
White
Maxwell
Keefe
Frost
Young
Ball
Langdon
Witts
Grundy
Nice _________________ Don't count the days, make the days count. |
|
|
|
|
|