| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
What'sinaname 
Joined: 29 May 2010
Location: Living rent free
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| swoop42 wrote: | | Ultimately the decision on Buckley appears to have been made after he, ...... EGM and shouldn't expect Korda to just lay down and step aside. |
Wrong Swoop42.
Just ask Lazza. Wrighty reads Nick's and made his decision based solely on the posts from:
- Boy who cried wolf,
- Jezza and
- CarringbushCigar. |
|
|
|
 |
orie 
A MADPIE FOR LIFE
Joined: 11 Apr 2000
Location: Heart and Soul.
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I signed the petition however is it still available for others who want to sign?
_________________
'MADE IT LEGENDARY' |
|
|
|
|
mattdally
Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
The club has until 5pm this evening to release the member information else they may be taken to court. The article is on the HS website now.
Interesting development - spill the board now so we can give the incoming coach some stability before they arrive. |
|
|
|
|
robevpau1
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
(Herald Sun) Collingwood’s presidential fight could be headed to court after the Magpies failed to hand over membership details by Friday’s 5pm deadline.
Long-time member David Hatley said he would consider legal action under the Corporations Act if the Magpies did not provide the information required to cross-check the names on his petition to spill the board.
In a dramatic backdrop to Nathan Buckley’s last game as senior coach on Monday, Hatley asked the Magpies to come to the party on the membership details by 5pm Friday or face the prospect of legal action.
But the Magpies did not make contact with Hatley on Friday, which will prompt talks between Hatley and his associates across the weekend about their legal options. |
|
|
|
|
slangman
Joined: 11 Aug 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Another reason why Korda & Co need to go!!!
Maybe they need a lesson in accountability via an EGM!
_________________
- Side By Side - |
|
|
|
|
Rd10.1998_11.1#36
rd10.1998_11.1#36
Joined: 18 Jul 2018
Location: Sevilla, Spain
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| What'sinaname wrote: | | The board took decisive action which is exactly what we want |
How is the coach announcing he is stepping down before the bye, after the board said they would review his position in the 2H of the season, "decisive action" by the board?
_________________
https://forever.collingwoodfc.com.au/sav-sinks-the-dockers/ |
|
|
|
|
pietillidie
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| robevpau1 wrote: | (Herald Sun) Collingwood’s presidential fight could be headed to court after the Magpies failed to hand over membership details by Friday’s 5pm deadline.
Long-time member David Hatley said he would consider legal action under the Corporations Act if the Magpies did not provide the information required to cross-check the names on his petition to spill the board.
In a dramatic backdrop to Nathan Buckley’s last game as senior coach on Monday, Hatley asked the Magpies to come to the party on the membership details by 5pm Friday or face the prospect of legal action.
But the Magpies did not make contact with Hatley on Friday, which will prompt talks between Hatley and his associates across the weekend about their legal options. |
Any update?
If they're using tinpot dictator tactics, may they get what they deserve and then some.
_________________
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010
Location: Living rent free
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Rd10.1998_11.1#36 wrote: | | What'sinaname wrote: | | The board took decisive action which is exactly what we want |
How is the coach announcing he is stepping down before the bye, after the board said they would review his position in the 2H of the season, "decisive action" by the board? |
The coach was sacked. Told he wont be coaching next year. A decision presented and ratified by the board. |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| What'sinaname wrote: | | Rd10.1998_11.1#36 wrote: | | What'sinaname wrote: | | The board took decisive action which is exactly what we want |
How is the coach announcing he is stepping down before the bye, after the board said they would review his position in the 2H of the season, "decisive action" by the board? |
The coach was sacked. Told he wont be coaching next year. A decision presented and ratified by the board. |
I'm sure I heard some of the guys on SEN referring to Nathan being told he won't see out the rest of the year games wise after the bye regardless, i.e he was actually sacked but obviously Nathan graciously accepted it and what we saw was the club and Nathan presenting it in the best light possible.
_________________
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!! |
|
|
|
|
robevpau1
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
A potential court stoush is a significant new twist in Collingwood’s presidency dogfight, as a face-off between incumbent Mark Korda and challenger Jeff Browne looms.
The battle for Collingwood’s presidency could play out in court after the club did not provide membership details to long-time Magpies fan David Hatley for verification of the signatures in his bid to trigger an Extraordinary General Meeting, per The Herald Sun.
But The Herald Sun reports that after failing to receive the member’ details, Hatley could now take matters to court under the Corporations Act.
“We’ll contact our legal counsel to explore our legal options which may include a court injunction to produce the required information under the Corporations Act,” Hatley told The Herald Sun.
It is believed that Browne – a former AFL lawyer and boss of Channel 9 – could help Hatley with legal matters if the dispute goes to court. (The Herald Sun) |
|
|
|
|
Gerry Cooper
Joined: 23 Feb 2012
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| robevpau1 wrote: | A potential court stoush is a significant new twist in Collingwood’s presidency dogfight, as a face-off between incumbent Mark Korda and challenger Jeff Browne looms.
The battle for Collingwood’s presidency could play out in court after the club did not provide membership details to long-time Magpies fan David Hatley for verification of the signatures in his bid to trigger an Extraordinary General Meeting, per The Herald Sun.
But The Herald Sun reports that after failing to receive the member’ details, Hatley could now take matters to court under the Corporations Act.
“We’ll contact our legal counsel to explore our legal options which may include a court injunction to produce the required information under the Corporations Act,” Hatley told The Herald Sun.
It is believed that Browne – a former AFL lawyer and boss of Channel 9 – could help Hatley with legal matters if the dispute goes to court. (The Herald Sun) |
Is Hately actually just a stalking horse for Browne and Co?
_________________
We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true.� |
|
|
|
|
robevpau1
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Gerry Cooper wrote: | | robevpau1 wrote: | A potential court stoush is a significant new twist in Collingwood’s presidency dogfight, as a face-off between incumbent Mark Korda and challenger Jeff Browne looms.
The battle for Collingwood’s presidency could play out in court after the club did not provide membership details to long-time Magpies fan David Hatley for verification of the signatures in his bid to trigger an Extraordinary General Meeting, per The Herald Sun.
But The Herald Sun reports that after failing to receive the member’ details, Hatley could now take matters to court under the Corporations Act.
“We’ll contact our legal counsel to explore our legal options which may include a court injunction to produce the required information under the Corporations Act,” Hatley told The Herald Sun.
It is believed that Browne – a former AFL lawyer and boss of Channel 9 – could help Hatley with legal matters if the dispute goes to court. (The Herald Sun) |
Is Hately actually just a stalking horse for Browne and Co? |
Question worth asking - a pawn in the game? |
|
|
|
|
neil 
Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Location: Queensland
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| robevpau1 wrote: | (Herald Sun) Collingwood’s presidential fight could be headed to court after the Magpies failed to hand over membership details by Friday’s 5pm deadline.
Long-time member David Hatley said he would consider legal action under the Corporations Act if the Magpies did not provide the information required to cross-check the names on his petition to spill the board.
In a dramatic backdrop to Nathan Buckley’s last game as senior coach on Monday, Hatley asked the Magpies to come to the party on the membership details by 5pm Friday or face the prospect of legal action.
But the Magpies did not make contact with Hatley on Friday, which will prompt talks between Hatley and his associates across the weekend about their legal options. |
Who are Hatleys associates? Anyone know? Are they Brownes people? or others?
_________________
Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum |
|
|
|
|
Rd10.1998_11.1#36
rd10.1998_11.1#36
Joined: 18 Jul 2018
Location: Sevilla, Spain
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| What'sinaname wrote: | | Rd10.1998_11.1#36 wrote: | | What'sinaname wrote: | | The board took decisive action which is exactly what we want |
How is the coach announcing he is stepping down before the bye, after the board said they would review his position in the 2H of the season, "decisive action" by the board? |
The coach was sacked. Told he wont be coaching next year. A decision presented and ratified by the board. |
Sacked and told he won't be coaching next year are not the same thing. His contract ended this season. What was the "decision presented and ratified by the board" and where was it published? Backroom shenanigans designed to avoid an EGM are not "decisive action" IMHO
_________________
https://forever.collingwoodfc.com.au/sav-sinks-the-dockers/ |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010
Location: Living rent free
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Rd10.1998_11.1#36 wrote: | | What'sinaname wrote: | | Rd10.1998_11.1#36 wrote: | | What'sinaname wrote: | | The board took decisive action which is exactly what we want |
How is the coach announcing he is stepping down before the bye, after the board said they would review his position in the 2H of the season, "decisive action" by the board? |
The coach was sacked. Told he wont be coaching next year. A decision presented and ratified by the board. |
Sacked and told he won't be coaching next year are not the same thing. His contract ended this season. What was the "decision presented and ratified by the board" and where was it published? Backroom shenanigans designed to avoid an EGM are not "decisive action" IMHO |
Wright would have discussed / recommended to the board that Buckley would not be re-signed. The Board would have ratified that recommendation. Buckley was told and decided to stand down after Monday.
I can't see how that's not decisive action by the Board on the future of the coach. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
