| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Presti35 
Dick Lee for Legend Status
Joined: 05 Oct 2001
Location: London, England
|
| Post subject: 2022 Trade Period. (COMPLETED) |  |
|
Ok, here we go. Trade period opens up at 9am.
What can we expect from here? Hopefully some early moves by the club, but usually we dont see a lot of movement until later.
-Will Grundy be traded, what for? How much of his wage do we chip in?
-Will Mitchell, Hill, Frampton and Fiorini be traded in?
-Will Henry be traded out? Again, what will the rerun be?
-Are there going to be any surprises?
All these questions will be answered in the next ten days.
_________________
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
Last edited by Presti35 on Wed Oct 12, 2022 7:10 pm; edited 19 times in total |
|
|
|
 |
Haff 
Joined: 25 Apr 2016
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Yes 300k, yes, yes late first round (maybe future), no.
_________________
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after. |
|
|
|
|
piffdog
Joined: 18 Jun 2021
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I wonder if we will end up paying less for Grundy and get less in return... Melbourne's first pick currently #33 - and I know they are expecting to get some high picks for Jackson - just wondering if they want to try and keep a higher pick for themselves? Which would mean paying more wage and giving us a second rounder (for example). However, their cap is surely bulging...
Be nice to see McStay, Frampton and Hill all get done quick - I don't think they are dependent on anything else now that JDG has signed up.
_________________
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems... |
|
|
|
|
Mr Miyagi
Joined: 14 Sep 2018
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I’ll come back on day 10 when things happen  |
|
|
|
|
lazzadesilva
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
The one certainty is that there will be a trade that no one foresaw. Always a surprise happens, maybe on the last day of trading, which is the result of secret talks that have been going on.
_________________
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️ |
|
|
|
|
Mr Miyagi
Joined: 14 Sep 2018
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Jack Bowes nominated Geelong. How da fug can they get all these players abd stay under the salary cap. |
|
|
|
|
burnsy17
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Win the flag and still end up with 2 first round picks including a pick inside the top 10.
They’re freaks.
_________________
Beware the swooping Magpie. |
|
|
|
|
Mr Miyagi
Joined: 14 Sep 2018
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| burnsy17 wrote: | Win the flag and still end up with 2 first round picks including a pick inside the top 10.
They’re freaks. |
I know they have a lot of farms down Geelong way, but even that can’t explain all the bullshit |
|
|
|
|
mattdally
Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Good - hopefully that means we can get a better return than pick 18 for Ollie Henry |
|
|
|
|
lazzadesilva
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Yes I think this truly stinks of something being done to manipulate the salary cap. You can’t expect all their players to happily accept 20% cuts to their salaries just to bring in player after player after they have just won the flag. You have to be pretty naive to believe that. Something smells worse than a dead rat next to a dead skunk 👃
_________________
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️ |
|
|
|
|
Mr Miyagi
Joined: 14 Sep 2018
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| mattdally wrote: | | Good - hopefully that means we can get a better return than pick 18 for Ollie Henry |
Nope, the pick they’ll get with Bowes will go for Bruhn. Geelong supporters are being obnoxious re Ollie — reckon he’s only worth a late pick. And when they get him they’ll claim he’s as good as Ablett. |
|
|
|
|
mattdally
Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Then we don't trade Ollie.
Work on him after the draft to convince him to stay. |
|
|
|
|
lazzadesilva
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| mattdally wrote: | Then we don't trade Ollie.
Work on him after the draft to convince him to stay. |
Yes I agree. Back our ability to negotiate with him and change his mind. This should not be seen as a done deal. Plenty to play out.
_________________
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️ |
|
|
|
|
tbaker
Joined: 02 Jul 2018
Location: Q19 Southern Stand MCG
|
| Post subject: | |
|
The Age reporting (today's trade blog): "Football department chief Graham Wright says the Magpies are disappointed in Ollie Henry’s decision to seek a trade to Geelong and still hope to retain the young forward."
_________________
I find your lack of faith disturbing |
|
|
|
|
piffdog
Joined: 18 Jun 2021
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Mr Miyagi wrote: | | Jack Bowes nominated Geelong. How da fug can they get all these players abd stay under the salary cap. |
'Cause they don't do 7 year/$7m contracts... Hawkins got paid <$300k this year.
_________________
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems... |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
