Post Match. Swans end Pies' run. All comments.

[Greening gold]

[think positive]

[Quincy]

Why does Howe spoil his own teammates?

[JC Hartley]

Collingwood's latest venture to the Sydney Cricket Ground saw their unbeaten run come to a halt against the Sydney Swans by 27 points. The Magpies were unable to play to their strengths throughout the day, while the Swans cashed in on the scoreboard whenever the Woods made skill errors, while finding time and space to beat Collingwood's defence. When Collingwood looked to find targets up forward, they could not take very many marks and were unable to force any significant forward half intercepts to impact the scoreboard themselves. The opening term was largely controlled on Sydney's terms by holding a lead of 13 points at quarter time. The second term was a stalemate with the Swans narrowly winning the quarter by 2 points to take a lead of 15 points into the main break at half time. The third quarter saw some momentum shifts, but ultimate control remained with Sydney who went into the final change with a comfortable lead to the tune of 23 points. The final term saw Collingwood charge at the Swans with everything they got, but could not eat into the deficit at the right times, while the Swans absorbed the barrage of pressure and inched away before killing the clock with possession and stoppages to win the fourth quarter by 4 points, and ultimately the match by 27 points. Collingwood walked away from this loss by producing their lowest score of the season.

Collingwood were only able to win a frugal number of key statistical indicators such as hit-outs by +21 (51 - 30), centre clearances had an advantage of +6 (13 - 7), and +3 for intercept possessions (77 - 74). Sydney dominated the stat sheet, where they claimed disposals by +68 (390 - 322), kicks were won by +52 (250 - 198), +16 for handballs (140 - 124), contested possessions had a differential of +29 (166 - 137), while uncontested possessions had a gap of +57 (227 - 170). Clearances went in favour of the Swans by +7 ( 45 - 38 ), with stoppage clearances up by +13 (38 - 25), while tackles were won by +19 (72 - 53), and +1 for Tackles Inside 50 (13 - 12). Marks had an advantage of +27 (97 - 70), with a differential of uncontested marks determined by +25 (85 - 60), while contested marks were up by +2 (12 - 10), and Marks Inside 50 had a margin of +4 (9 - 5), with Inside 50s won narrowly by +3 (55 - 52).

Scott Pendlebury (26 disposals @ 54%, 480 metres gained, 15 contested possessions, 11 uncontested possessions, 6 intercept possessions, 15 kicks, 11 handballs, 3 marks, 4 tackles, 2 goal assists, 5 score involvements, 9 clearances, 2 centre clearances, 7 stoppage clearances, 3 Inside 50s & 2 Rebound 50s) accumulated successfully, but his skill execution let him down. The Swans set up a trap for Pendlebury in the first term to take the corridor option, and made him pay on the scoreboard. From that moment, the whole team were reluctant to use the corridor due to the nature of Sydney's ability to score from turnovers. Pendlebury also found it hard to find time and space whenever he won clearances, especially from stoppages, where his effectiveness from clearances was substantially reduced.

Josh Daicos (25 disposals @ 60%, 489 metres gained, 13 contested possessions, 12 uncontested possessions, 5 intercept possessions, 17 kicks, 8 handballs, 3 marks, 3 tackles, 7 score involvements, 7 clearances, 7 centre clearances, 7 Inside 50s & 1 goal) got increased midfield time and won every single centre clearance for Collingwood. Withstanding additional skill errors from Josh, which were across the whole team to be frank, he was the most threatening player that looked like creating scoring opportunities up forward, so at least Josh held his own end of the bargain in that respect, and could have additional midfield time next week against Carlton.

Jack Crisp (19 disposals @ 53%, 442 metres gained, 7 contested possessions, 12 uncontested possessions, 3 intercept possessions, 11 kicks, 8 handballs, 3 marks, 5 tackles, 2 score involvements, 4 clearances, 3 stoppage clearances, 4 Inside 50s & 3 Rebound 50s) produced territory with each possession, but poor ball use and minimal scoreboard impact made rather indifferent reading for him, when he usually is a barometer for how well the team is playing.

Darcy Cameron (15 disposals @ 60%, 243 metres gained, 8 contested possessions, 7 uncontested possessions, 31 hit-outs, 11 kicks, 4 handballs, 2 marks, 4 tackles, 3 score involvements & 2 Rebound 50s) provided first-use for his midfield to dominate at centre clearances, but that was where the story ended. Cameron's work around the ground was minimised and inconsequential to the outcome of the match.

Trent Bianco (14 disposals @ 79%, 397 metres gained, 3 contested possessions, 11 uncontested possessions, 3 intercept possessions, 9 kicks, 5 handballs, 6 marks, 2 tackles, 2 clearances, 2 stoppage clearances, 3 Inside 50s & 5 Rebound 50s) came in as a late inclusion for Jordan De Goey, and was solid without being brilliant on the wing. Bianco, like many of his teammates were forced to kick long to contests all day.

Callum Brown (14 disposals @ 86%, 171 metres gained, 4 contested possessions, 10 uncontested possessions, 4 intercept possessions, 5 kicks, 9 handballs, 3 marks, 2 score involvements & 3 Inside 50s) was the medical substitute for the day, and he came on to replace Jack Ginnivan who strained his hamstring. Brown won his own ball in the second half, and showed some composure under pressure. Brown is in the mix for another game next week as a midfielder. His efforts could be rewarded, subject to player availability in the coming days.

Mason Cox (11 disposals @ 54%, 110 metres gained, 7 contested possessions, 4 uncontested possessions, 4 intercept possessions, 19 hit-outs, 8 kicks, 3 handballs, 4 marks, 2 contested marks & 1 goal) was competitive in ruck contests and gave his midfield opportunities to win the ball. Cox also chimed in with a few marks to give his team a marking option.

John Noble (20 disposals @ 70%, 512 metres gained, 19 uncontested possessions, 3 intercept possessions, 13 kicks, 7 handballs, 6 marks, 5 tackles, 4 Inside 50s & 4 Rebound 50s) maximised territory with his possessions without necessarily achieving the desired outcome. Noble had a couple of stints on the wing to see if he could break a few lines and cover for Josh Daicos or Steele Sidebottom when the pair were occupied in the midfield. The experiment was short-lived in patches.

Nick Daicos (20 disposals @ 60%, 368 metres gained, 11 contested possessions, 9 uncontested possessions, 5 intercept possessions, 2 marks, 4 score involvements, 3 clearances, 3 stoppage clearances, 3 Inside 50s, 2 Rebound 50s & 1 goal) was shut down early in the opening quarter, before Nick was thrown forward and in the midfield to break a tag. Nick was able to accumulate with a bit more freedom in the second half, but his influence was well and truly stifled.

Jeremy Howe (20 disposals @ 85%, 390 metres gained, 8 contested possessions, 12 uncontested possessions, 8 intercept possessions, 12 kicks, 8 handballs, 7 marks, 3 contested marks & 10 Rebound 50s) gave stability to his team with numerous intercept marks. Howe's ball use was reasonable, despite making some errors coming out of defence that came back twofold.

Brayden Maynard (18 disposals @ 67%, 541 metres gained, 3 contested possessions, 15 uncontested possessions, 5 intercept possessions, 15 kicks, 3 handballs, 6 marks, 3 tackles, 3 score involvements, 5 Inside 50s & 2 Rebound 50s) spent the whole day kicking long to contests, which was extremely challenging and difficult as the Swans took away Maynard's ability to find free targets or leading players in the right position to mark the ball. Maynard also had a stint or two on the wing to get into the game, where he was able to provide opportunities for the forwards.

Nathan Murphy (14 disposals @ 86%, 166 metres gained, 5 contested possessions, 9 uncontested possessions, 10 intercept possessions, 9 kicks, 5 handballs, 3 marks & 4 Rebound 50s) played his role well by intercepting anything that came his way, and showed composure with his ball use.

Beau McCreery (10 disposals @ 50%, 230 metres gained, 3 contested possessions, 7 uncontested possessions, 5 kicks, 5 handballs, 3 tackles, 2 Tackles Inside 50, 2 goal assists, 3 score involvements & 4 Inside 50s) was arguably Collingwood's most lively forward with his will and want to tackle still there for all to see, and he gave his teammates chances to score up forward.

Will Hoskin-Elliott (9 disposals @ 33%, 229 metres gained, 7 contested possessions, 2 uncontested possessions, 6 kicks, 3 handballs, 2 marks, 6 tackles, 2 Tackles Inside 50 & 3 Inside 50s) produced great pressure, but skill execution up forward was severely lacking. Hoskin-Elliott was forced to dispose of the footy under pressure which allowed the Swans to intercept the ball and allow them to play their high-possession game.

Ash Johnson (8 disposals @ 50%, 134 metres gained, 5 contested possessions, 3 uncontested possessions, 6 kicks, 2 handballs, 4 marks, 2 contested marks, 2 Marks Inside 50, 2 tackles, 3 score involvements & 1 goal) proved to be the only major aerial threat that Collingwood had ahead of the ball, and that was the case all day. Johnson was slightly wasteful with his opportunities at goal, which was disappointing.

Jack Ginnivan (7 disposals @ 100%, 149 metres gained, 6 contested possessions, 3 kicks, 4 handballs, 3 score involvements, 2 Inside 50s & 1 goal) made a moderate impact on the scoreboard during the first half. Shortly after kicking his only goal of the game, Ginnivan was subbed out of the game with a tight hamstring, but could still be available for Collingwood’s next match or the first final if precautions are taken.

Collingwood's next game will be against Carlton on August 21 at the MCG. Huge day of footy for both clubs, with the VFL game commencing at 11:45 in the morning before the seniors play on the same ground from 15:20 in the afternoon. Get that win to secure a place in the top four, and ensure the Blues feel blue in both defeat and the face.

[Piesnchess]

^ Id love to see you do an in depth history of the Collingwood FC, you write very well indeed, you know your facts, opinions, indepth stuff extremely well, your bloody brilliant J C. ! Well done.

[23 YIPPEE!!!]

Would like to see Collingwood play Sydney at the MCG not the SCG for once also same goes for Brisbane as well.
Bit done with playing them away all the time

[bally12]

In fact opposite to what Buckley thinks, this team isn't a product of 5 years in the making, but a team desperately trying to shake off the Buckley cloak of negativity, timidness, wont to go in their shells and not take risks. Unfortunately the spectre of Buckley's influence strangled this team today. The only time the swans looked scared and on the back foot was a10min period at the start of the last quarter when we threw caution to the wind. I say this because I've heard countless times McCrae's attempt to reinforce the message of being aggressive and playing chaos footy.

The SCG is a shit ground to play and watch footy at. In fact I refuse to watch any SCG games, and only barely suffer through our ones there. The only way to play this ground against a super defensive rugby team like Sydney, is direct through the middle.You can't kick to packs along the flanks. Own the middle, create chains through the middle and hit up leading forwards with low passes, or bomb it through from 50 on the run. Kicking long on this ground will get you nowhere, even if it's to the top of your goalsquare.
We fluffed our lines today. Let's use it as a learning opportunity and reload.

The booing of Ginni while he was injured and on the bench was a disgrace. And for what? Because that Swans thug tackled him around the neck? If I recall correctly didn't Goodes also play for frees and got booed? Hmm. Short memories.
Loved Coxy's mark backing into a pack...highlight of the day for me.
Buddy is a flog. He just plays for frees and demands the unp gives him a free for anything and everything. Take your model influencer wife and go to the Gold Coast to scrounge another 800k after Sydney has paid you 10mill over 10 years. It's the Buddy show after all isn't it?
Quaynor, poor game and your hair looks ridiculous.
Biamco, you need to have a massive preseason next year. Get your body shape looking like a professional athlete.
Cal Brown, not up to the standard. Nothing to be ashamed of, but no way can we keep you on the list next year.
WHE, to say you put your body on the line is like saying Stuart Dew watches what he eats.
Good game by Josh Daicos. All Australian winger for mine.
Ash Johnson did really well to present.. Lot of marks just didn't stick today....unlucky.
Next week's going to be super contested finals type game.
IN: Ruscoe / OUT. Noble
IN: Mccrae / OUT: Bianco
IN: Henry / OUT: Ginnivan (inj)
Sub: Carmichael

[Jezza]

Fly's presser

The winning streak has come to an end, how do you reflect on that after the match?

[think positive]

ThanksJezzs, much appreciated.

And god I love This coach, perfect answers , brilliant

[Marvelos]

[RudeBoy]

The loss was a long time coming. We looked rather tired and it seemed that the smaller SCG suited the Swans enabling them to flood back more easily. If we'd played on the MCG I reckon we'd have had their measure. Losing JDG, on top of Adams, was a major blow. I think Mihocek is playing sore too.

All in all, however, it wasn't disastrous. We did not get thrashed, and we will regroup quickly and hopefully get JDG back to face the Blues.

[didick]

Through the streak I found it difficult to see any coverage of us after a win, even reporting the result on the ABC news. Like we were getting snubbed. Wake up this morning and within ten minutes two mentions of the amazing Swans upsetting the Pies. Blatant bias.

[Mr Miyagi]

[Haff]

I don’t get the hate for noble. Take the game on, tries 100%. Sure he can turn it over but Pendles turned it over 2-3 times yesterday.

[What'sinaname]