View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
^ eddiesmith has no actual idea - he thinks De Goey is a gun and Grundy isn't. That's all you need to know. |
|
|
|
|
Pies2016
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
^ ^ ^
Well the love for Cox will surely only grow after he likely lines up on Keefe in the ruck against the Giants ( pending a test on second choice ruckman Flynn, this week ) That’s not Cox fault, he can only compete against who is put in front of him but some would do well to keep his “ good fortune “ in perspective. Matching or beating the best ruckman in the comp for a number of years is a very different exercise to knocking over a back up ruckman and an injured first choice ruckman in consecutive weeks.
I’m looking forward to Cox competing against a fully fit Witts in a fortnight. Win or break even in that battle and Cox will deserve some credit for an unlikely revival. Until then, I’m happy to wait on passing any judgement. |
|
|
|
|
Cam
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002 Location: Springvale
|
Post subject: | |
|
Cameron statistically is a better contested mark than Grundy, and kicks more goals although that could be simply because he is playing forward more often. However in the ruck position, this season only, Grundy averages double the hitouts of Cameron and triple that of Cox, double their inside 50s, double their clearances.
Grundy wears down the opposition rucks as well, I guess you could say Cox did that against Gawn as well. Grundy does it every week, even when he is not shining himself he is still a physical presence in packs. He can also tear a game apart, doing it regularly over his career.
If Grundy didn't have the price tag people wouldn't even be mentioning him as being a negative. He's a gun and a warrior. I like what Cameron and Cox are bringing but I expect Reg to feel the competition and come back and within a few games return to the level of the last quarter he played, on ANZAC day. _________________ Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Well said Cam. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
DP |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
piffdog wrote: | stui magpie wrote: | Cameron to Full Back... |
No. Here we go again with the “play someone in a position they’ve never played before” claims. I don’t know what the answer is - but it isn’t this… |
Roughead was a premiership ruck who we made into a full back. The AFL record books are full of players who failed as key forwards but flourished when sent back.
Presti was recruited as a CHF as one example. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Let's be perfectly clear. Grundy is one of the top 3 ruckmen in the AFL. No ifs, no buts, no maybes. That's where he will play most of his time. However, he can certainly add to his value by adding a role as a resting key forward. He has shown an ability to take pack marks and kick goals already, so there's no reason why he can't do that more often. |
|
|
|
|
Cam
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002 Location: Springvale
|
Post subject: | |
|
Agreed RB. _________________ Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
eddiesmith
Lets get ready to Rumble
Joined: 23 Nov 2004 Location: Lexus Centre
|
Post subject: | |
|
Cam wrote: | Cameron statistically is a better contested mark than Grundy, and kicks more goals although that could be simply because he is playing forward more often. However in the ruck position, this season only, Grundy averages double the hitouts of Cameron and triple that of Cox, double their inside 50s, double their clearances.
Grundy wears down the opposition rucks as well, I guess you could say Cox did that against Gawn as well. Grundy does it every week, even when he is not shining himself he is still a physical presence in packs. He can also tear a game apart, doing it regularly over his career.
If Grundy didn't have the price tag people wouldn't even be mentioning him as being a negative. He's a gun and a warrior. I like what Cameron and Cox are bringing but I expect Reg to feel the competition and come back and within a few games return to the level of the last quarter he played, on ANZAC day. |
Statistically Grundy is a great ruckman, fantastic for supercoaches everywhere, but he isn't a match winning ruckman.
What good are 75 hitouts when the team still loses because his hitouts aren't helping the team? |
|
|
|
|
Cam
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002 Location: Springvale
|
Post subject: | |
|
Grundy has had 6 straight top 5 finishes in the coveted Gavin Brown medal... which shows exactly how good he has been to poll that well amongst Nicksters of all kinds and biases. This shows his class as a match winning ruckman. _________________ Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
People need to go back and watch Grundy's final quarter performance on Anzac Day.
He was literally playing on one leg, and still dominated Sam Draper. _________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
Monco Matt
Do it to THEM before THEY do it to YOU
Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Location: Sittin, Drinkin, Reloadin & Waitin
|
Post subject: | |
|
So, what to do with Grundy is a difficult issue to settle as long as Cox and Cameron stay fit and keep playing good footy. This is because it is far more beneficial to the team and the salary cap to play two Ruck/Forwards that can also drop back by paying a combined $800k p.a for both than to have one Ruckman on $1m+ p.a that is not particularly great anymore at doing any of those things. The Grundy situation is horrible for the club and team. This may be hard for many to accept but it is hurting us. No ruckman is worth $1m+. You only need two half price ruckman that are competitive.
Now, we either trade Grundy to the Adelaide Crows (they are desperate for a ruckman) for a 1st round & 3nd round pick and full salary relief. Or, we keep Grundy and make him earn his spot over Cox or Cameron. Meaning, one is going to play VFL if they are not doing what we need. We know Cox can show good form for a few weeks then drop off, he has done this for 5 years. Cameron is more consistent. But, we cannot play all three, too top heavy.
Personally, I'd keep Cameron and Cox, trade Grundy and develop one or two kids in the VFL as replacement ruckmen. DO NOT spend a lot of money on ruckmen going forward. We need to spend some money on a KPF and now a KPD with Roughie retiring. Spend the money more wisely is what will strengthen the team into premiership metal. _________________ RED "BABY" CAVANAUGH: Didn't hear what the bet was.
MONCO: Your life. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Let's re-visit this thread after Reg wins the Norm Smith this year. |
|
|
|
|
Ronnie McKeowns boots
Ronnie Mckeowns boots
Joined: 27 Jul 2020
|
Post subject: | |
|
burnsy17 wrote: | Adelaide are desperate for a ruckman. O’Brien hasn’t got long left I don’t reckon and they don’t have much coming from behind him.
They’re positioned low on the ladder which gives them draft pick trade currency.
Take their first pick and a second rounder / player and do the deal Pies!
Cox isn’t the answer, but Cameron / Begg might be. Or we can grab a half decent ruck from one of the other clubs who isn’t getting a game.
There are plenty of options. |
First rounder and Fogarty, jungle drums are already beating, Grundy not that bothered either way apparently...as long as he gets his filthy lucre, every penny |
|
|
|
|
Wonka
Joined: 06 Jan 2019
|
Post subject: | |
|
Jezza wrote: | People need to go back and watch Grundy's final quarter performance on Anzac Day.
He was literally playing on one leg, and still dominated Sam Draper. |
While Grundy did lift in the final quarter on Anzac Day and deserves some credit for that, the facts of the matter are that, first, he really needed to after his insipid first three quarters and, second, Sam Draper as an AFL player is barely out of his nappies, especially when you consider at what age ruckmen usually develop into good players. By all means, people can go back and watch Grundy's final quarter, but while they are at it, they should also watch his first three quarters. |
|
|
|
|
|