| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PyreneesPie 
PyreneesPie
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| think positive wrote: | | Jordan is more than 5 points in any game |
Yes indeedy. |
|
|
|
 |
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| I'd rather have had Varcoe to Brown. |
|
|
|
|
Cam 
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002
Location: Springvale
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Cox was the season killer. Wrecked our structure regardless of his output.
_________________
Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
K
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| We were losing lots of games before Cox's injury (so people claimed the opposite). |
|
|
|
|
Cam
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002
Location: Springvale
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Hey K, offer something up so people can debunk you... You seem to spend most of your time responding to others in a negative fashion, put up some thoughts, original or otherwise, so you can get picked off too.
_________________
Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
K
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Do you really think I'm being negative, Cam? |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Remember, 2 negatives equal a positive!  |
|
|
|
|
Deja Vu
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I’ll support K and say that our forward line seemed to start working again after Mason got injured.
_________________
http://youtu.be/hvtdbfI1sqQ |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I felt that our fwd line was more fluid when Mason out but there are things to consider
If Grundy does head to his home state Mason won’t go on the surplus list IMO
And if that young tall from Sydney comes to us Cox will be there to assist him
All speculation at this time. Let’s see how the cookie crumbles eh!!
_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
Pies2016
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Cam wrote: | | Cox was the season killer. Wrecked our structure regardless of his output. |
I think that comment is really well put. The implication is that he didn’t have to be a good player on the night to still contribute to most of our wins.
He would either give a chop out in the ruck or draw two players in our forward line every time he went for a mark.
It’s a domino effect. If Cox plays, then a guy like Miochek only goes one out with an opponent on every occasion. A few have ripped into a Miochek but he was asked to do way to much in the absence of Cox, DeGoey etc |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
