Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Who’s the whipping boy this season (2019-2022)?

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:55 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

But you set it up as Grundy vs. the mids. Maybe Grundy and the mids are all to blame.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:59 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

K wrote:
But you set it up as Grundy vs. the mids. Maybe Grundy and the mids are all to blame.

When a team wins the hitouts 60 to about nothing and the hitouts to advantage about 20 to nothing, it's clear enough why we're getting nutted in the clearances (and it probably isn't the ruckman who had about a dozen clearances on his own that I'm looking at).
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies2016 



Joined: 12 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 11:43 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies4shaw wrote:
K wrote:
But you set it up as Grundy vs. the mids. Maybe Grundy and the mids are all to blame.

When a team wins the hitouts 60 to about nothing and the hitouts to advantage about 20 to nothing, it's clear enough why we're getting nutted in the clearances (and it probably isn't the ruckman who had about a dozen clearances on his own that I'm looking at).


Not to be smart but if I was reviewing the clearances, I would also be looking at what’s occurring with the 40 odd extra hit outs that Grundy got that didn’t go to our advantage.
50 + hit outs in a game is an anomaly but it will be done against English a few times this year ( Witts did it the week before ) so I imagine the Dogs midfield would have spent an entire pre season setting up to rove against the oppositions ruckman.
Obviously we have room for improvement in the guts but at least we also have the time to fine tune it.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:05 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Against Sydney, the Bulldogs lost the hitouts 49 to 20 but won the clearances 41 to 32.

Against Hawthorn, the Bulldogs lost the hitouts 46 to 17 but won the clearances 37 to 25.

Against Gold Coast, the Bulldogs lost the hitouts 71 to 16 but won the clearances 44 to 30.

Against Collingwood, the Bulldogs lost the hitouts 60 to 6 and lost the clearances 26 to 33.

Notably, Grundy had 91% of the hitouts (in the other games, the figures were 71%, 73% and 82%) and Collingwood won the clearances by 7 (previous opponents had lost clearances by 9, 12 and 14). So, Collingwood is the only team to win the stoppages against the Bulldogs and turned around that aspect of the game by 21 clearances - from -14 to +7 - compared to Gold Coast's effort the previous week.

Whatever Grundy did with his other 40 hitouts - and whatever the perception may be on Nick's - the Bulldogs did not clear the ball away from contests at anything like the rate they did against other teams in their three previous games this season and - whilst I agree English is hopeless and it's only been a matter of degree each week - scarcely touched the ball in the ruck contest.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
5 from the wing on debut 



Joined: 27 May 2016


PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:13 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The hit-out stat is hardly worth keeping. The soft tap to a team mate standing at your feet, who is surrounded by opponents and immediately tied up, is worthless in the way that we are currently seeing it.

Effective hit outs are the important ones. They are normally hit into clear space which at least give a team mate the chance to run onto it and keep going.

I would've liked to see one of our midfielders standing 4 or 5 metres goalside of centre at centre bounces and have Grundy aim there. That may have worked and it would also have dragged another Dogs midfielder away from Grundy's feet at the centre bounce which would leave more room and space for a soft tap.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:22 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

5 from the wing on debut wrote:
The hit-out stat is hardly worth keeping. The soft tap to a team mate standing at your feet, who is surrounded by opponents and immediately tied up, is worthless in the way that we are currently seeing it.

Effective hit outs are the important ones. They are normally hit into clear space which at least give a team mate the chance to run onto it and keep going.

I would've liked to see one of our midfielders standing 4 or 5 metres goalside of centre at centre bounces and have Grundy aim there. That may have worked and it would also have dragged another Dogs midfielder away from Grundy's feet at the centre bounce which would leave more room and space for a soft tap.

Hitting the ball into clear space is fine if you've got the quick outside runners. We don't. I'm quite confident that Grundy is rucking as directed, given that our blokes, for the most part, are too slow to chase back effectively.

On the question of effective hitouts, Grundy won the effective hitouts 17 to nil against the Bulldogs. I can't find a convenient record of effective hitouts over time but I don't expect that the figures ever approach the actual number of hitouts a player has.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies2016 



Joined: 12 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:55 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies4shaw wrote:
Against Sydney, the Bulldogs lost the hitouts 49 to 20 but won the clearances 41 to 32.

Against Hawthorn, the Bulldogs lost the hitouts 46 to 17 but won the clearances 37 to 25.

Against Gold Coast, the Bulldogs lost the hitouts 71 to 16 but won the clearances 44 to 30.

Against Collingwood, the Bulldogs lost the hitouts 60 to 6 and lost the clearances 26 to 33.

Notably, Grundy had 91% of the hitouts (in the other games, the figures were 71%, 73% and 82%) and Collingwood won the clearances by 7 (previous opponents had lost clearances by 9, 12 and 14). So, Collingwood is the only team to win the stoppages against the Bulldogs and turned around that aspect of the game by 21 clearances - from -14 to +7 - compared to Gold Coast's effort the previous week.

Whatever Grundy did with his other 40 hitouts - and whatever the perception may be on Nick's - the Bulldogs did not clear the ball away from contests at anything like the rate they did against other teams in their three previous games this season and - whilst I agree English is hopeless and it's only been a matter of degree each week - scarcely touched the ball in the ruck contest.


Thanks for the numbers, P4S. Unlike some, I’m happy to review footy stats all day long.
What these do numbers say collectively, is that we have been able to get on top of probably the bulldogs greatest strength ( clearance work ) I guess it comes down to how much of that success you apportion to Grundy and how much to our mids. No doubt he couldn’t get first hands on the ball anymore than he did but centre clearance work will always be the sum of all parts. There will always remain room for improvement in both the ruck and roving roles, however I would agree that most of the improvement needs to come from the mids.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:33 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies2016 wrote:
...
Thanks for the numbers, P4S. Unlike some, I’m happy to review footy stats all day long.
...

Be very, very careful, P16! You're setting yourself up as a target for the whingers, who say "I come to Nick's for opinions, not to review footy stats all day long."
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:45 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

You're welcome, Pies2016. If anyone can tell us where to find "effective hitouts" or "hitouts to advantage", that would be great, too.

It is probably useful to recognise that over half our clearances were effected by Grundy (6), Adams (6) and Pendlebury (5) between them. Crisp (!!!), Treloar and JDG each had 3, whilst Sidey and Phillips each had 2.

Hopefully, Treloar's figures will pick up - he started slowly last year but had much better figures as the season progressed, even after he came back from injury. Because he's been moved to play predominantly on the wing, Sidey's clearance numbers are well down on 2018 - he hasn't had more than 3 clearances in a game this year but last year, he averaged 4. Beams is supposed to pick up that slack (he averaged 5.6 clearances per game last year, second only - amongst our players - to Adams who averaged 6.2, with Grundy and Pendlebury each in the 5s and Treloar almost at 5) but, whilst he was adequate against Geelong and Richmond, he had just the 1 clearance against West Coast.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:54 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Where did you get the other stats? afl.com.au will have "hitouts to advantage".
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 5:52 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

AFL tables and footywire.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 9:15 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't, yet, find any compilation of stats for "hitouts to advantage" over time that lets me see the stat historically across many seasons for lots of great ruckmen but Triple M has compiled a bunch of stats from the 2018 season, here: https://www.triplem.com.au/story/all-the-records-from-2018-107088

Those are just for the home and away season, by the looks of things, but they suggest that "hitouts to advantage" for the two best ruckmen of 2018 were about one-third of their hitouts. On that basis, Grundy probably had, say, somewhere between 0.5 and 2 less effective hitouts than we might have anticipated in such a dominant display of rucking against Footscray. That's hardly the reason for our clearance difficulties.

The AFL site has the following list from 2017. It records the most hitouts to advantage in a season, then, as 316 (Gawn in 2016) and says the stat has been kept since 1999. I guess that means Gawn's 348 last year was probably the home and away record.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-12-28/alltime-season-stats-recordholders

There's a link in that article to the 2017 stats leaders. It shows Jacobs as leading hitouts and effective hitouts in 2017 (when Adealide, of course, made the Grand Final). He had 254 hitouts to advantage from 882 hitouts won, which had him going at a bit under 29%, I think.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Presti35 Virgo

Dick Lee for Legend Status


Joined: 05 Oct 2001
Location: London, England

PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2019 9:13 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Rupert Wills
_________________
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
Magpietothemax Taurus

magpietothemax


Joined: 28 Apr 2013


PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2019 9:30 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Presti35 wrote:
Rupert Wills

Yeah, sad but true.
Another candidate is JT. He seems to cop massive flak if he doesn't kick 3 or 4 goals.

_________________
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2019 9:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^ No he isn't a whipping boy. He just played a poor game. The two are quite different.

My view on Wills is simple. I like him. I've advocated for his inclusion in previous seasons. I watched his last VFL game against Essendon and thought he had no impact on the game early when it was there to be won. It was my view that he would not be able to play good footy at AFL level in that form. The team then had a bye and he was picked after the bye, more or less out of necessity - we lost two mids and no-one else could be picked following the Essendon VFL game because the senior-listed mids were all useless in that match until the game was over. He played about how I thought he might on the back of what I'd seen in the VFL.

Langdon is the whipping boy - it doesn't matter who falls over in the goal square, who misses the defensive punch or which player's opponent does all the damage for the opposition, he gets the blame for it. The team has got the second best defence in the AFL and people still want him replaced by a bloke who can't run out of sight on a dark night, hasn't touched a footy in anger for 12 months and apparently can't stand up for any length of time without his ACLs falling out.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 4 of 9   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group