US election 2020
Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests Registered Users: None |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Who do you hope wins the US Election? |
Trump |
|
39% |
[ 9 ] |
Biden |
|
39% |
[ 9 ] |
Don't Care |
|
21% |
[ 5 ] |
|
Total Votes : 23 |
|
Author |
Message |
pietillidie
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Woods Of Ypres wrote: | Economy growing 4% quarterly
Unemployment lowest levels
Tariffs introduced
Tax reform
Red tape removed
Defeated ISIS
Dialogue with Fat Kim
The man gets sh*t done.
Trump again please |
Your highlights are tax cuts to billionaires, aggressive protectionism and global economic suppression, environmental destruction, an unleashing of the forces which brought the world the GFC, photos with North Korean elites, share buybacks, and a pile of shite low-paid jobs? I'm sure people are really looking forward to having their healthcare and social services cut to pay for the privilege.
More bizarrely, if you don't hold US assets then global economic growth suppression has just slashed your own personal wealth and income. Captain Bankrupt never fails to find fools willing to pay for his bad debts, alright. Grab the champagne! _________________ In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
Don't want to get prematurely excited, but Sanders is killing it in the polls right now. Up 7%, 12%, 11% and 12% from his nearest competitor in the last four national polls, and well ahead in Nevada, California (!), Texas (!!), Maine and Vermont, among others. Bloomberg's catching up fast, though, so it'll be interesting to see how tomorrow's debate (his first) goes, and whether Darth Mike's teflon coating is still affixed once everyone else on stage has put their baseball bats away. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
pietillidie
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
|
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
David, Sanders is not going to be POTUS. Not this time, not ever.
AOC is your best bet next time, assuming she's eligible by age. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
David wrote: | Don't want to get prematurely excited, but Sanders is killing it in the polls right now. Up 7%, 12%, 11% and 12% from his nearest competitor in the last four national polls, and well ahead in Nevada, California (!), Texas (!!), Maine and Vermont, among others. Bloomberg's catching up fast, though, so it'll be interesting to see how tomorrow's debate (his first) goes, and whether Darth Mike's teflon coating is still affixed once everyone else on stage has put their baseball bats away. |
It's down to Sanders and Bloomberg.
The DNC will do everything in their power to install Bloomberg as the Democratic nominee. _________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
stui magpie wrote: | David, Sanders is not going to be POTUS. Not this time, not ever.
AOC is your best bet next time, assuming she's eligible by age. |
What makes you so sure? If he can get the nomination (which he’s well on track to) plus unite the "vote blue no matter who" crowd with his younger multiracial base, he’s got as good a shot as anyone. Not saying it’s exactly a lay-down misere – I don’t think any of us can predict what’ll happen between now and November – but Trump is far from unbeatable. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
^ I watched it, David.
Consensus seems to be that Warren performed strongly. Bernie was his usual self and Bloomberg looked bored out of his brain having to debate.
In saying that, I doubt any of them beat Trump. _________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
That all checks out with what I saw, though for me it’s debatable who "won" out of Buttigieg and Klobuchar – what’s clear is that they were at each other’s throats all night, and both came across as petty at times, I thought.
100% agree with the view that Sanders benefited from Bloomberg’s presence; it both gave him a target to go after and shielded him from copping most of the heat (as the current frontrunner). While there’s a long way to go, honestly, I don’t think he could have scripted a better primary for himself so far – a lot of luck has fallen his way; think about how Biden’s entry took the sting out of questions around Sanders’ age and how Joe’s early polling dominance (which crumbled as soon as people started casting votes) effectively killed off the otherwise dangerous Kamala Harris and Beto O’Rourke campaigns. Also see how Warren took a lot of the early heat from the establishment as a "radical left" candidate when she seemed like a frontrunner. And now you have four or five viable "centrist" candidates jostling for position without a clear leader.
I guess the big question if the current course holds is: what happens if there’s a brokered convention? If Sanders does end up with the most votes, how much does he need to make a compelling case for getting the nod (or, at least, scare the DNC out of backstabbing him)? Five out of the six candidates thought that the person with the most votes shouldn’t necessarily get the nomination, so that’s going to be interesting if it comes to pass. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
David wrote: | stui magpie wrote: | David, Sanders is not going to be POTUS. Not this time, not ever.
AOC is your best bet next time, assuming she's eligible by age. |
What makes you so sure? If he can get the nomination (which he’s well on track to) plus unite the "vote blue no matter who" crowd with his younger multiracial base, he’s got as good a shot as anyone. Not saying it’s exactly a lay-down misere – I don’t think any of us can predict what’ll happen between now and November – but Trump is far from unbeatable. |
Trump is beatable, but Bernie isn't the one to do it.
I just can't see enough people voting for his socialist agenda. That's not the DNA of the USA. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
pietillidie
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
|
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
I think the zeitgeist can change very quickly. Think about how America was (or was popularly seen) in the Bush era – a bunch of Christian fundamentalist, mouth-frothing performative patriots. Or think about the Tea Party era under Obama, when suddenly everyone cared about debt ceilings. Neither of those relatively recent trends on the right can account for the ascension of the Trump candidacy, and neither does the conservative, weak-tea Democratic Party of the mid 2000s bear a great deal of resemblance to the shape of the current primary. One of the most popular politicians in the country among young people is an open democratic socialist, and I'm not talking about Bernie Sanders – I'm talking about the even-more beloved Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. I think if Sanders' socialism was the handicap some say it is then the political establishment would be a lot less afraid of him than they are. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
Wokko
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Alexandria "You can't pull yourself up by your bootstraps it's physically impossible" Ocasio-Cortez. |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
David wrote: | I think the zeitgeist can change very quickly. Think about how America was (or was popularly seen) in the Bush era – a bunch of Christian fundamentalist, mouth-frothing performative patriots. Or think about the Tea Party era under Obama, when suddenly everyone cared about debt ceilings. Neither of those relatively recent trends on the right can account for the ascension of the Trump candidacy, and neither does the conservative, weak-tea Democratic Party of the mid 2000s bear a great deal of resemblance to the shape of the current primary. One of the most popular politicians in the country among young people is an open democratic socialist, and I'm not talking about Bernie Sanders – I'm talking about the even-more beloved Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. I think if Sanders' socialism was the handicap some say it is then the political establishment would be a lot less afraid of him than they are. |
And who do you think the AOC I referred to was?
By the time she's old enough to be POTUS, she may just get there. Her time is coming, Sanders window has passed. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|