| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mossi 
Joined: 20 May 2002
Location: Vittorio Veneto TV Italy
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| ^ sorry I thought you were putting Moore in the same basket as the others who had quiet games. |
|
|
|
 |
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Mossi wrote: | | ^ sorry I thought you were putting Moore in the same basket as the others who had quiet games. |
No need at all to be sorry - I should have been clearer the first time. If I'd quoted DTM's post instead of just replying, mine might have made more sense. |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname 
Joined: 29 May 2010
Location: Living rent free
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pies4shaw wrote: | | John Wren wrote: | | ^^ will head along to the game tomorrow. looks like it will be a tropical 8 degrees. not sure what this game will tell us in the context of next week's selections given it's the bottom of the ladder team. |
Cox will get 17 hitouts and kick 3.0 - that will lead to calls for Cloke to be dropped for team balance.
Wills will have 14 kicks and 23 handballs and kick 1.3 and 2 OOF - and that will lead to qldmagpie67 calling for his inclusion at Sidebottom's expense.
Goldsack will get 43 kicks and 81 handballs and take 183 intercept marks playing CHB and RudeBoy will claim that the decision to drop Goldie has been the making of him.
It will just be a normal week, really. |
Buckley would be mad to promote Goldsack as there must be about 59 times where Goldsack doesn't dispose of the ball by hand or foot, therefore making him responsible for about 59 free kicks against. |
|
|
|
|
5150 
Joined: 31 Aug 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Phillips for Greenwood
DeGoey on thin ice |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| What'sinaname wrote: | | Pies4shaw wrote: | | John Wren wrote: | | ^^ will head along to the game tomorrow. looks like it will be a tropical 8 degrees. not sure what this game will tell us in the context of next week's selections given it's the bottom of the ladder team. |
Cox will get 17 hitouts and kick 3.0 - that will lead to calls for Cloke to be dropped for team balance.
Wills will have 14 kicks and 23 handballs and kick 1.3 and 2 OOF - and that will lead to qldmagpie67 calling for his inclusion at Sidebottom's expense.
Goldsack will get 43 kicks and 81 handballs and take 183 intercept marks playing CHB and RudeBoy will claim that the decision to drop Goldie has been the making of him.
It will just be a normal week, really. |
Buckley would be mad to promote Goldsack as there must be about 59 times where Goldsack doesn't dispose of the ball by hand or foot, therefore making him responsible for about 59 free kicks against. |
Well played, sir! That's hyperbole for you. |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| 5150 wrote: | Phillips for Greenwood
DeGoey on thin ice |
???
Greenwood wasn't in the team, he was managed (rested) along with Cox.
_________________
All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
Bob Sugar
Joined: 11 Feb 2010
Location: Benalla
|
| Post subject: | |
|
It's the Crows home game Donny, Crows v Pies, not Pies v Crows.
_________________
Defender...........
On the day before the first, Daicos created God.
You like this. |
|
|
|
|
Bob Sugar
Joined: 11 Feb 2010
Location: Benalla
|
| Post subject: | |
|
2 questions
Is this the second time this year we've had back to back road trips?
And, are we the only team the AFLs Frankenstien monster hasn't beaten?
_________________
Defender...........
On the day before the first, Daicos created God.
You like this. |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Bob Sugar wrote: | 2 questions
Is this the second time this year we've had back to back road trips?
And, are we the only team the AFLs Frankenstien monster hasn't beaten? |
Pretty sure I heard the second on the broadcast.
_________________
All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
Jezza 
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Bob Sugar wrote: | 2 questions
Is this the second time this year we've had back to back road trips?
And, are we the only team the AFLs Frankenstien monster hasn't beaten? |
1). No we haven't had back-to-back interstate trips this year up until now.
2). No they haven't beaten us, North Melbourne, Richmond and West Coast in their history. Although, they have a chance beating the other three sides later this year.
_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
Location: is where I'm at
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Massive game, I rate the crows in front of their feral fans as a bigger challenge than beating GWS, away. A performance like yesterdays might be enough but I suspect we'll have to take it up another notch (not being 4 goals down at qtr. time would greatly help). Barring extraordinary performances in the VFL today, I'll go with "NO CHANGE"
_________________
Fault finding is like window washing. All the dirt seems to be on the other side.
________________________________________
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
didick
didick
Joined: 17 Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane
|
| Post subject: | |
|
We will have that crowd to deal with.
No crowds like Adelaide Oval at GWS home games.
Bigger crowds at our VFL games.
_________________
"The night is a very dark time for me" Chaz Michael Michaels |
|
|
|
|
5150
Joined: 31 Aug 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MightyMagpie wrote: | | 5150 wrote: | Phillips for Greenwood
DeGoey on thin ice |
???
Greenwood wasn't in the team, he was managed (rested) along with Cox. |
Shouldn't post after celebratory beers.
I'll try again.
Phillips (depending on VFL game) or (preferably) Greenwood in for DeGoey.
Anyone think Caff could go with Eddie Betts? |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
There is likely to be just one change.
Caff out and Greenwood in.
Caff did a reasonable defensive job on Heater, though Shaw ended up with 20 disposals. Greenwood is a better option because he is a better runner. |
|
|
|
|
Cam 
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002
Location: Springvale
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| RudeBoy wrote: | There is likely to be just one change.
Caff out and Greenwood in.
Caff did a reasonable defensive job on Heater, though Shaw ended up with 20 disposals. Greenwood is a better option because he is a better runner. |
This.
Although I think there will be a forced change due to injury
so
IN: Greenwood, Phillips
OUT: Macaffer, Fasolo [inj]
_________________
Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
