View previous topic :: View next topic |
Please rate Nathan's performance 0-5 stars |
***** 5 out of 5 |
|
18% |
[ 7 ] |
**** 4 out of 5 |
|
23% |
[ 9 ] |
*** 3 out of 5 |
|
23% |
[ 9 ] |
** 2 out of 5 |
|
21% |
[ 8 ] |
* 1 out of 5 |
|
10% |
[ 4 ] |
Donut - 0 out of 5 |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 38 |
|
Author |
Message |
CarringbushCigar
Joined: 15 Nov 2007 Location: wherever I lay my beanie
|
Post subject: Nathan Buckley 2016 Report Card - Round 2 v Richmond | |
|
its a win and i liked the langdon move forward which was influential and i liked pendles back early
Last edited by CarringbushCigar on Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010 Location: Living rent free
|
Post subject: | |
|
The win doesn't hide the fact that the team is a long way off being a threat. Bucks gets 1 out of 5 only for getting the team to breathe fire early.
But skills are still abysmal, the backline is frightening and the forward line is god awful ugly. _________________ Fighting against the objectification of woman. |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013 Location: WA
|
Post subject: | |
|
Sample size is too small for a meaningful conclusion. Let's at least wait until we see 22 players putting in a fully committed effort to execute Buckley's game plan before we make an assessment. _________________ All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013 Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
Post subject: | |
|
Bucks got 1 more vote from me then he did last week. An infinite improvement from last week, but still hardly good enough.... |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013 Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
Post subject: | |
|
MightyMagpie wrote: | Sample size is too small for a meaningful conclusion. Let's at least wait until we see 22 players putting in a fully committed effort to execute Buckley's game plan before we make an assessment. |
They did, the season is on... the play games are over. |
|
|
|
|
roar
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pendles back was good.
Having Williams take kick-ins was bad. _________________ kill for collingwood! |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Edit the thread title. It was round 2. |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013 Location: WA
|
Post subject: | |
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote: | MightyMagpie wrote: | Sample size is too small for a meaningful conclusion. Let's at least wait until we see 22 players putting in a fully committed effort to execute Buckley's game plan before we make an assessment. |
They did, the season is on... the play games are over. |
Well I disagree as does the coach if you listened to his presser post match. _________________ All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013 Location: WA
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | Edit the thread title. It was round 2. |
Funny feeling that was a deliberate error ...
We didn't play last week did we? _________________ All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
CarringbushCigar
Joined: 15 Nov 2007 Location: wherever I lay my beanie
|
Post subject: | |
|
not deliberate though i wish it was round 1
we would have swanny back |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013 Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
Post subject: | |
|
Who are these nuffies who are voting 5 out of 5, or 4 out 5... like seriously?!? Have we got plants from other clubs here trying to work things up, cause anyone with half a brain cell knows it was no where near that. |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013 Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
Post subject: | |
|
MightyMagpie wrote: | The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote: | MightyMagpie wrote: | Sample size is too small for a meaningful conclusion. Let's at least wait until we see 22 players putting in a fully committed effort to execute Buckley's game plan before we make an assessment. |
They did, the season is on... the play games are over. |
Well I disagree as does the coach if you listened to his presser post match. |
If you are running onto the ground, you're 100% committed... like really, you mean that... come on man get serious. |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013 Location: WA
|
Post subject: | |
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote: | MightyMagpie wrote: | The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote: | MightyMagpie wrote: | Sample size is too small for a meaningful conclusion. Let's at least wait until we see 22 players putting in a fully committed effort to execute Buckley's game plan before we make an assessment. |
They did, the season is on... the play games are over. |
Well I disagree as does the coach if you listened to his presser post match. |
If you are running onto the ground, you're 100% committed... like really, you mean that... come on man get serious. |
When you are committed and you actually stick a tackle ... that's what I'm talking about. He didn't have his best game, but Darcy gave it his all every contest I saw. How many limp tackles did we lay where Richmond players were barely impeded? We can agree they SHOULD be 100% committed when they run out, but (for whatever reason) the effort of some last night was not 100% and the coach called some (unnamed publicly) players out.
By your reasoning all players were 100% committed vs Sydney ... seriously? _________________ All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013 Location: WA
|
Post subject: | |
|
So we have a benchmark, what mark would Ross Lyon get for 2016 so far? _________________ All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010 Location: Living rent free
|
Post subject: | |
|
MightyMagpie wrote: | So we have a benchmark, what mark would Ross Lyon get for 2016 so far? |
Hard to say. If they have been beaten by better teams but are playing with purpose and structure, then probably 2 or 3 out of 5. From what I saw of the GC game, Freo looked OK but were beaten by a much better team. |
|
|
|
|
|