Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Nathan Buckley 2016 Report Card - Round 2 v Richmond

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Please rate Nathan's performance 0-5 stars
***** 5 out of 5
18%
 18%  [ 7 ]
**** 4 out of 5
23%
 23%  [ 9 ]
*** 3 out of 5
23%
 23%  [ 9 ]
** 2 out of 5
21%
 21%  [ 8 ]
* 1 out of 5
10%
 10%  [ 4 ]
Donut - 0 out of 5
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 38

Author Message
CarringbushCigar Taurus



Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Location: wherever I lay my beanie

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:02 pm
Post subject: Nathan Buckley 2016 Report Card - Round 2 v RichmondReply with quote

its a win and i liked the langdon move forward which was influential and i liked pendles back early

Last edited by CarringbushCigar on Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:33 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
What'sinaname Libra



Joined: 29 May 2010
Location: Living rent free

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:09 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The win doesn't hide the fact that the team is a long way off being a threat. Bucks gets 1 out of 5 only for getting the team to breathe fire early.

But skills are still abysmal, the backline is frightening and the forward line is god awful ugly.

_________________
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MightyMagpie 



Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:16 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Sample size is too small for a meaningful conclusion. Let's at least wait until we see 22 players putting in a fully committed effort to execute Buckley's game plan before we make an assessment.
_________________
All We Can Be
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
The Boy Who Cried Wolf 



Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:29 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Bucks got 1 more vote from me then he did last week. An infinite improvement from last week, but still hardly good enough....
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
The Boy Who Cried Wolf 



Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

MightyMagpie wrote:
Sample size is too small for a meaningful conclusion. Let's at least wait until we see 22 players putting in a fully committed effort to execute Buckley's game plan before we make an assessment.


They did, the season is on... the play games are over.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
roar 



Joined: 01 Sep 2004


PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:47 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pendles back was good.

Having Williams take kick-ins was bad.

_________________
kill for collingwood!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:16 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Edit the thread title. It was round 2.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MightyMagpie 



Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:
MightyMagpie wrote:
Sample size is too small for a meaningful conclusion. Let's at least wait until we see 22 players putting in a fully committed effort to execute Buckley's game plan before we make an assessment.


They did, the season is on... the play games are over.


Well I disagree as does the coach if you listened to his presser post match.

_________________
All We Can Be
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MightyMagpie 



Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies4shaw wrote:
Edit the thread title. It was round 2.


Funny feeling that was a deliberate error ...

We didn't play last week did we?

_________________
All We Can Be
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
CarringbushCigar Taurus



Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Location: wherever I lay my beanie

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:35 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Smile not deliberate though i wish it was round 1
we would have swanny back Sad
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
The Boy Who Cried Wolf 



Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 6:29 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Who are these nuffies who are voting 5 out of 5, or 4 out 5... like seriously?!? Have we got plants from other clubs here trying to work things up, cause anyone with half a brain cell knows it was no where near that.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
The Boy Who Cried Wolf 



Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 6:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

MightyMagpie wrote:
The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:
MightyMagpie wrote:
Sample size is too small for a meaningful conclusion. Let's at least wait until we see 22 players putting in a fully committed effort to execute Buckley's game plan before we make an assessment.


They did, the season is on... the play games are over.


Well I disagree as does the coach if you listened to his presser post match.


If you are running onto the ground, you're 100% committed... like really, you mean that... come on man get serious.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MightyMagpie 



Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 7:59 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:
MightyMagpie wrote:
The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:
MightyMagpie wrote:
Sample size is too small for a meaningful conclusion. Let's at least wait until we see 22 players putting in a fully committed effort to execute Buckley's game plan before we make an assessment.


They did, the season is on... the play games are over.


Well I disagree as does the coach if you listened to his presser post match.


If you are running onto the ground, you're 100% committed... like really, you mean that... come on man get serious.


When you are committed and you actually stick a tackle ... that's what I'm talking about. He didn't have his best game, but Darcy gave it his all every contest I saw. How many limp tackles did we lay where Richmond players were barely impeded? We can agree they SHOULD be 100% committed when they run out, but (for whatever reason) the effort of some last night was not 100% and the coach called some (unnamed publicly) players out.

By your reasoning all players were 100% committed vs Sydney ... seriously?

_________________
All We Can Be
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MightyMagpie 



Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:10 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

So we have a benchmark, what mark would Ross Lyon get for 2016 so far?
_________________
All We Can Be
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
What'sinaname Libra



Joined: 29 May 2010
Location: Living rent free

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:22 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

MightyMagpie wrote:
So we have a benchmark, what mark would Ross Lyon get for 2016 so far?


Hard to say. If they have been beaten by better teams but are playing with purpose and structure, then probably 2 or 3 out of 5. From what I saw of the GC game, Freo looked OK but were beaten by a much better team.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 10 Hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group