View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ThePieMind
Joined: 11 Apr 2009
|
Post subject: | |
|
If Wellingham wins 2 brownlows, then MAYBE we could be considered as having lost out in this trade. |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
Post subject: | |
|
wow, I didn't expect 4 pages out of this little teaser.
To be honest, I hadn't thought of Wellingham once since he left and then I watched him have a brilliant 5 minutes for the eagles (which I was only watching while waiting for the pies - or was it after the pies? it was early in the morning for me), including a 70 meter goal.
I think the trade was smart then and I think it was smart now. It just explains why we went backwards a bit last 2 years. Not only did we lose the old guys to retirement, we gave up a few decent middle aged players with high trade value in order to build a really strong team for the future. _________________ Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
piedys wrote: | Pies4shaw wrote: | ^^^ I actually thought he was most unlucky to be suspended - he was contesting the ball. If he'd hit a Collingwood player, they would have accepted that he was going for the mark, as he plainly was. |
I'd have to have another look at it, to contemplate changing my opinion.
My initial impression on seeing the clip ad nauseam before the tribunal decision was that he lined Simpson up for a hit, in an impulsive attempt to "fly the flag" for the club.
The theory was good, but the execution sloppy and ultimately dangerous.
But certainly not in the farcical sense that was Sidebottom's St.kilda bump [3 weeks?], or Thomas's hit on Freo in late 2011, which effectively trainwrecked our momentum going into September. |
I've always thought he was hard done by, and that footage still makes me cheer! Was bloody beautiful, just unlucky the guy hit the ground hard!
As for Daisy in 2011, watch the last round again, that's where we lost it, in the coaches box in the last round. _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | Thomas was a good player, when he could still walk unassisted and kick over a jam jar. |
Haha spot on, gees how many good games has he played for carlscum? And people still bang on about it _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
schuey07
Joined: 05 Aug 2008 Location: Mount Waverley
|
Post subject: | |
|
think positive wrote: | Pies4shaw wrote: | Thomas was a good player, when he could still walk unassisted and kick over a jam jar. |
Haha spot on, gees how many good games has he played for carlscum? And people still bang on about it |
Only one person. The crazy 35forever. He still thinks he is the greatest player in the AFL. |
|
|
|
|
MagpiesTheGreat
Joined: 01 Dec 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
spilt milk...long time ago. |
|
|
|
|
mudlark
Joined: 19 Mar 2002 Location: Maroochydore Qld
|
Post subject: | |
|
Happy to see the "one way bus ticket" for Sharrod. He's a cat,and the biggest turnover king playing the game.He is the oppositions 19th player on the ground . No loss for me. |
|
|
|
|
Stupied
Joined: 14 Mar 2013
|
Post subject: | |
|
Really? This is thread worthy? I can see the headline now:
"Former magpie has first good game in 3 years. Random internet Magpie supporter laments the loss of bog average player." |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
Post subject: | |
|
Stupied wrote: | Really? This is thread worthy? I can see the headline now:
"Former magpie has first good game in 3 years. Random internet Magpie supporter laments the loss of bog average player." |
Any thread that makes it to page 4 has satisfied the criteria for a thread. it stimulates discussion.
Its certainly a better thread than "We should trade Witts, delist Reid and play Mason Cox!!!!" which are three current threads on page 1....... _________________ Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
Pies2016
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
^^^
Yep, if you don't like the thread, then don't give it oxygen.
Wasn't it Geoff Walsh who also added that wellingham never finished in the top ten in any of the B And Fs in all the time he was there ?
Maybe he was just unlucky ? |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Location: The 18
|
Post subject: | |
|
Wellingham played 1 elite game in his time at the club.
Pendles and Swan have done it most weeks for a 5+ year period. _________________ He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
Gerry Cooper
Joined: 23 Feb 2012
|
Post subject: | |
|
Wellingham seems to have bulked up this year too. Something he never did at Collingwood. _________________ We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true.� |
|
|
|
|
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
Post subject: | |
|
Wellingham always looked good in our midfield and probably still would. Problem is our midfield wouldn't look real good with him in it _________________ Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
Dangles
Balmey Army
Joined: 14 May 2015
|
Post subject: | |
|
If Wellingham would look good in our midfield then Dangerfield would look absolutely sen-f**cking-sational
And to those who say that Danger is locked into to the Cats I say screw the defeatist BS. They said the same thing about Buddy and the Giants.
Last edited by Dangles on Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:19 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
sixpoints
Joined: 27 Sep 2010 Location: Lulie Street
|
Post subject: | |
|
Dangles wrote: | If Wellingham would look good in our midfield then Dangerfield would absolutely sen-f**cking-sational.
And to those who say that Danger is locked into to the Cats I say screw the defeatist BS. They said the same thing about Buddy and the Giants. |
Can't locate 'Buddy and the Giants' anywhere....what exactly do they sing? |
|
|
|
|
|