Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Who'd win?

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  

who'd win the battle of the black & white's?
Pendles' Pies
21%
 21%  [ 4 ]
Maxy's Maggies
78%
 78%  [ 15 ]
Total Votes : 19

Author Message
Damien Aquarius

Me Noah & Flynn @ the G


Joined: 21 Jan 1999
Location: Croydon Vic

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 4:54 pm
Post subject: Who'd win?Reply with quote

So a couple of fellow magpie supporters and I were discussing all thing Collingwood last night in the middle of the local footy ground and freezing our nuts off whilst our young fellas went through their paces at footy training. We were having some lively banter about what amazing depth it seems that we now have on our list and arguing the toss of: Brown v Frost Witts v Reid Young v Seedsman etc..

So it got me thinking during this Bye round (a time of reflection) about the scenario of having every single player on our list fit and in form (a scenario that will probably never actually happen).

OK this is probably a bit indulgent and maybe even a little cocky (and yes I have too much time on my hands), but here are TWO Collingwood sides that I reckon would mix it with most other sides. A bit like when we had Australia and Australia A in the cricket.

Who do you reckon would win? Pendles' Pies or Maxy's Maggies?

Here we go:



Pendles Pies

B: Toovey Brown Armstrong
HB: Fasolo Frost Seedsman
C: Lumumba Ball Freeman
HF: Blair Witts Sinclair
F: Kennedy White Dwyer
Foll: Grundy Pendlebury (C) Adams

IC: Scharenberg Marsh Oxley Yagmoor


Maxy's Maggies

B: Young Keefe Williams
HB: Langdon Reid Maxwell (C)
C: Macaffer Beams Goldsack
HF: Karnezis Lynch Elliott
F: Sidebottom Cloke Martin
Foll: Hudson Swan Thomas

IC: Mooney Clarke Broomhead Ramsay


In reality either of these sides could well take the field in the event of a diabolical run with injuries and we'd still be competitive I reckon, which is pretty amazing I reckon too.

I might put up a poll to answer the question. Cast your vote and tell us why...and feel free to reflect on what I reckon seems like a bloody deep list we have built that has me very excited for the present and the future.

_________________
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
3.14159 Taurus



Joined: 12 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 4:57 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Collingwood.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Raw Hammer 



Joined: 11 Sep 2008
Location: The Gutter

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 5:09 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pendles' forward line is atrocious.
_________________
Est. 2002
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
mattys123 



Joined: 06 Jul 2009
Location: Narre Warren, VIC

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 5:13 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Raw Hammer wrote:
Pendles' forward line is atrocious.

Yep that's what would tip it toward's Maxy's team for mine.

It shows that's probably the one area of the ground where we don't have great depth.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
slydog81 



Joined: 05 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 5:13 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Caff to tag Pendles out of the game.

Maxy by 4 kicks.

_________________
We're always up to mischief!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Damien Aquarius

Me Noah & Flynn @ the G


Joined: 21 Jan 1999
Location: Croydon Vic

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 5:24 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Raw Hammer wrote:
Pendles' forward line is atrocious.


Yep swap Elliot and Sinclair over would give them a bit more goal kicking power and even it up a tad more

_________________
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Piethagoras' Theorem Taurus

the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk


Joined: 29 May 2006


PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 5:27 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The team that hasn't got Armstrong. A lay down misere
_________________
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 5:44 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Maxy's is an all over stronger team. The exercise does demonstrate very good overall depth though.
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 6:34 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I disagree - I think we are very light on for half-back flankers if the first 9 get injured.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 6:43 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies4shaw wrote:
I disagree - I think we are very light on for half-back flankers if the first 9 get injured.


Shocked Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
woftam Gemini

I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.


Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Carum Downs, Vic

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 6:49 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Why would Armstrong be in the starting 18 instead of Scharenberg & Oxley if all are presumed fit?

I think it would be a great match though to be honest.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Damien Aquarius

Me Noah & Flynn @ the G


Joined: 21 Jan 1999
Location: Croydon Vic

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 7:07 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

woftam wrote:
Why would Armstrong be in the starting 18 instead of Scharenberg & Oxley if all are presumed fit?

I think it would be a great match though to be honest.


Good question ...for which I don't have a good answer

Team balance 😊

_________________
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Tannin Capricorn

Can't remember


Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 9:33 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Maxy's mob, in a canter, even though they are sadly lacking in the ruck department.

Nice thread!

_________________
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Piesnchess 

piesnchess


Joined: 09 Jun 2008


PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 10:01 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Itd be a draw, a hard fought, draw. thus I did not vote.
_________________
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Skids Cancer

Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.


Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 10:09 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Raw Hammer wrote:
Pendles' forward line is atrocious.


Yeah but got a way better midfield and a solid HB line... be a good contest, wonder if they might have played something similar a few times at training Question

_________________
Don't count the days, make the days count.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 10 Hours

Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group