View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lazza
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: Frees for, frees against | |
|
Team Frees For Frees Against Difference
St Kilda 85 112 -27
Brisbane Lions 104 117 -13
Adelaide Crows 104 114 -10
GWS Giants 102 112 -10
Carlton 84 94 -10
Collingwood 88 92 -4
Sydney Swans 111 112 -1
Richmond 110 111 -1
Hawthorn 104 104 0
Fremantle 112 109 3
Geelong Cats 102 99 3
Gold Coast Suns 99 93 6
Western Bulldogs 114 107 7
Essendon 112 105 7
West Coast Eagles 104 97 7
Melbourne 111 102 9
Port Adelaide 115 101 14
North Melbourne 123 103 20 |
|
|
|
|
Raw Hammer
Joined: 11 Sep 2008 Location: The Gutter
|
Post subject: | |
|
Wow, not at the bottom for the first time in a while.
Can you please provide a heat map of where the free kicks are paid (just kidding). I dare say our defensive end will be a cluster of red for all free kicks, both for and against. _________________ Est. 2002 |
|
|
|
|
Lazza
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
I cant provide a heat map but I reckon you are absolutely spot on that it will be in the defensive end. |
|
|
|
|
sixpoints
Joined: 27 Sep 2010 Location: Lulie Street
|
Post subject: | |
|
I bet the Umps are analyzing this right now, and will act to even up the Saints ledger next game they play.
Oh yeah... That's against us! |
|
|
|
|
MagpieMad
One in, All in!!
Joined: 15 Jan 2001 Location: -37.798563,144.996641
|
Post subject: | |
|
sixpoints wrote: | I bet the Umps are analyzing this right now, and will act to even up the Saints ledger next game they play.
Oh yeah... That's against us! | haha was thinking the same thing, they'll murder us to even up the numbers. _________________ Pain heals, Chicks dig scars, Glory..... lasts forever! |
|
|
|
|
Hm
Joined: 20 May 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
it would be good to see where the free for were paid and how many resulted in a goal. Many of our our paid in the back line to even up the numbers while our opposition get free shots at goal |
|
|
|
|
3.14159
Joined: 12 Sep 2009
|
Post subject: | |
|
The maggots kicked 2 in a row against Reed last weekend.
Bux wasn't the only one that was very unhappy. |
|
|
|
|
MattyD
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Location: Kew
|
Post subject: | |
|
I understand that it is the 'difference' that is important.
But if you look closer we have only been paid 88 free kicks which is a lot lower than most. |
|
|
|
|
raymond35
Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Location: Melbourne/Gold Coast
|
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010 Location: Living rent free
|
Post subject: | |
|
Saints to go from -27 to +4 this week _________________ Fighting against the objectification of woman. |
|
|
|
|
David
to wish impossible things
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: the edge of the deep green sea
|
Post subject: | |
|
MattyD wrote: | I understand that it is the 'difference' that is important.
But if you look closer we have only been paid 88 free kicks which is a lot lower than most. |
We also happen to have the least free kicks against of any club.
It's a conspiracy! _________________ "Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange |
|
|
|
|
taff wa
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
North melbourne +20 and they still only won 1 game.
Doesn't say much for what they do with the ball then.
|
|
|
|
|
David
to wish impossible things
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: the edge of the deep green sea
|
Post subject: | |
|
Melbourne +9. I wonder if there's such a thing as sympathy frees? _________________ "Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange |
|
|
|
|
mattys123
Joined: 06 Jul 2009 Location: Narre Warren, VIC
|
Post subject: | |
|
Gieschen came out today and said that the Reid free kick against was correct and that you can't bump, push etc.
Here's the actual rule;
Quote: | 15.4.3 Permitted contact
Other than the Prohibited Contact identified under Law 15.4.5, a
Player may make contact with another Player:
(a) by using their hip, shoulder, chest, arms or open hands
provided that the football is no more than 5 metres away
from the Player;
(b) by pushing the other Player with an open hand in the
chest or side of the body provided that the football is no
more than 5 metres away from the Player;
(c) by executing a Correct Tackle;
(d) by executing a Shepherd provided that the football is no
more than 5 metres away from the Player; or
(e) if such contact is incidental to a marking contest and
the Player is legitimately Marking or attempting to Mark |
Umm, at no stage did that umpire say on Thursday that the ball was more than 5 metres away, so it can not be a free kick against Reid under the rules.
Sack the Giesch. |
|
|
|
|
woftam
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
Post subject: | |
|
mattys123 wrote: | Gieschen came out today and said that the Reid free kick against was correct and that you can't bump, push etc.
Here's the actual rule;
Quote: | 15.4.3 Permitted contact
Other than the Prohibited Contact identified under Law 15.4.5, a
Player may make contact with another Player:
(a) by using their hip, shoulder, chest, arms or open hands
provided that the football is no more than 5 metres away
from the Player;
(b) by pushing the other Player with an open hand in the
chest or side of the body provided that the football is no
more than 5 metres away from the Player;
(c) by executing a Correct Tackle;
(d) by executing a Shepherd provided that the football is no
more than 5 metres away from the Player; or
(e) if such contact is incidental to a marking contest and
the Player is legitimately Marking or attempting to Mark |
Umm, at no stage did that umpire say on Thursday that the ball was more than 5 metres away, so it can not be a free kick against Reid under the rules.
Sack the Giesch. |
But the ball was further than 5 meters away from Reid when he pushed Bellchambers. Ump may not have said that but the ball was more than double that away. |
|
|
|
|
|