The Great Big Consolidated Alan Didak thread

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7854
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm

Post by burnsy17 »

Joel wrote:
burnsy17 wrote:
cobood wrote:Source??


A bloke here from work. Something about Ed being angry about Dids not telling the club the full circumstances of what happened straight away.


Yeah, great source that one.

And apparently (allegedly) Hudson has Did's mobile & home number stored in his mobile.. (they previously knew each other...)


So what? Dids was maggoted that night and probably gave it to him before he started firing shots.

Ed apparently sacked Dids on Tuesday morning and it took Pert & Dids 30 mins to convince Ed that the sanctions proposed by Dids are sufficient..


Great....yet more rumour and innuendo.


Yep - and here's the latest i have heard.... Didak to be charged in the next few hours for discharging a firearm....
Beware the swooping Magpie.
User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7854
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm

Post by burnsy17 »

Tess wrote:
burnsy17 wrote:
Joel wrote:
burnsy17 wrote:
cobood wrote:Source??


A bloke here from work. Something about Ed being angry about Dids not telling the club the full circumstances of what happened straight away.


Yeah, great source that one.

And apparently (allegedly) Hudson has Did's mobile & home number stored in his mobile.. (they previously knew each other...)


So what? Dids was maggoted that night and probably gave it to him before he started firing shots.



Ed apparently sacked Dids on Tuesday morning and it took Pert & Dids 30 mins to convince Ed that the sanctions proposed by Dids are sufficient..


Great....yet more rumour and innuendo.


Yep - and here's the latest i have heard.... Didak to be charged in the next few hours for discharging a firearm....


If he isn't Burnsy, I expect you will be red carded for at least 1 week if not for good.



Whatever you want Tess....
Beware the swooping Magpie.
KYPREO
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 1:55 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by KYPREO »

The part of about Didak's number being in his phone was apparently addressed in his statement to police. They found out about Didak either because of the mobile phone or, according to another source, a writtten note left with Didak's number on it.

Didak's explanation was that Hudson said he would be in Sydney for the upcoming game and asked if Dids could get him into the rooms. Didak gave him his number.

Part of the problem is that the statement released was put together by the police - the gaps in the story might have been covered in the statement, but because the investigation is ongoing not all the facts can be released.

There is a good chance lies have been told and people need to be prepared for things like that coming out. However, it doesn't necessarily follow that every small fact unearthed by journalists desparately trying to make the story even bigger than it already is mean it's all a huge conspiracy. There are no doubt plenty of small details that weren't included in the media statement (like the mobile phone number), but that doesn't mean they were deliberately hidden by Didak. The fact it wasn't declared to the media does not infer evidence of guilt.
Go Pies!!!
User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7854
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm

Post by burnsy17 »

Tess wrote:C'mon Burnsy I've heard the rumor too.

But announcing it on Nicks is JUST friggin stupid and I'm sure you'll agree if he isn't charged you should be punished for posting it publicly.



So this rumour being posted is different to the other 50 that have been....?? Why are you so concerned about this particular one.........?

Using your reasoning we should ban half the users on this board.
Beware the swooping Magpie.
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45050
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 1:10 pm
Contact:

Post by HAL »

That is a very original thought.
User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7854
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm

Post by burnsy17 »

Tess wrote:
burnsy17 wrote:Using your reasoning we should ban half the users on this board.


If only!


Lets just wait and see what happens... no point getting all worked up. Hopefully there is absolutely no truth in it.
Beware the swooping Magpie.
Joel
Posts: 21158
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 1999 7:01 pm
Location: Mornington Peninsula

Post by Joel »

Blah blah blah....and people hate trade rumours. What wank of a thread. Why don't we just wait and see.
User avatar
Arges Tuft
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:08 pm

Post by Arges Tuft »

burnsy17 wrote:Yep - and here's the latest i have heard.... Didak to be charged in the next few hours for discharging a firearm....


Didn't the cops charge Hudson over the Campbellfield shootings?
User avatar
David
Posts: 50458
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea

Post by David »

Burnsy I seriously hope that isn't true, but here's an optimistic view.

Rumours are just that... rumours. sometimes they're true, sometimes they're not.

Nathan Brown was coming to Collingwood after all ('No hoax'!) so I'll believe this when I see it.

I hope to see Didak's name in the side named tonight, and a great performance on Saturday. And then hopefully, all this stuff can be over with.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR
Posts: 4926
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:43 pm
Location: Under negotiation

Post by uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR »

You mean like when Nathan Brown announced his retirement earlier this year Burnsy17?????..... or more like when Hird was calling a press conference to do the same last year????

Hey, maybe you got your wires crossed & Didak will in fact retire??... Not that he had FIREd a weapon?!?!?!?! :roll:

PS: For what it's worth i personally don't think the whole story is out yet either,... although i was thinking more along the lines that it may never come out!
User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7854
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm

Post by burnsy17 »

uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR wrote:You mean like when Nathan Brown announced his retirement earlier this year Burnsy17?????..... or more like when Hird was calling a press conference to do the same last year????

Hey, maybe you got your wires crossed & Didak will in fact retire??... Not that he had FIREd a weapon?!?!?!?! :roll:

PS: For what it's worth i personally don't think the whole story is out yet either,... although i was thinking more along the lines that it may never come out!


Sometimes i get it wrong..... :)
Beware the swooping Magpie.
User avatar
Gazza05
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:13 am
Location: Warrnambool

Post by Gazza05 »

Aahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Wake me up when all this SH$% is over
ITS NOT MY FAULT BLOODY JONATHON BROWN COMES FROM WARRNAMBOOL !!
User avatar
cobood
Posts: 3695
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2000 6:01 pm
Location: Northern Subs Melbourne

Post by cobood »

I'm with you David...
....Collingwood Forever....
....Premiers 2010/
User avatar
Piethagoras' Theorem
Posts: 19589
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm

Post by Piethagoras' Theorem »

Discharged a firearm? Big &%^%&%^& deal! Did he shoot anyone?
My old man used to fire off a couple of shots in the air on New Years night. Is he a criminal? Hardly
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.
User avatar
Zakal
Posts: 5076
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:30 pm

Post by Zakal »

I dont want to talk too much about what is hopefully a stupid rumour (no offense burnsy), but I would have to question why the Police would make a statement declaring him "JUST a witness" a day before they charged him with something...they didnt just find out this morning, so why make the statement...i may be wrong but it just doesnt make any sense.


Futhermore, if some surveillance footage shows him "animated" it would also show him doing whatever the charge would relate to and rest assured it would have been reported by the media in that instance.
Post Reply