View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Big T
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Location: Torino, Italy
|
Post subject: Ceglar | |
|
The question just has to be asked, how much of a mistake have we made losing this guy?
Dave was right with his man crush. Ceglar is gonna be a very handy ruckmen for the hawks. _________________ Buon Giorno |
|
|
|
|
GreekLunatic
Joined: 22 Feb 2003 Location: doncaster vic australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
Bucks thought he wouldnt make it cause we have witts |
|
|
|
|
Big T
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Location: Torino, Italy
|
Post subject: | |
|
Stevie wonder could see Witts is an unknown quantity and will take time. _________________ Buon Giorno |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Ceglar was our third best ruck, not a terrible decision to move him on. Might have been a handy backup though. _________________ Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
Piesnchess
piesnchess
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
I doubt if this reject will get a game once big boy mcevoy comes back in. _________________ Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb. |
|
|
|
|
Big T
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Location: Torino, Italy
|
Post subject: | |
|
Haha u know Mcevoy is fully fit and playing reserves right? Ceglar is keeping him out. _________________ Buon Giorno |
|
|
|
|
Big T
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Location: Torino, Italy
|
Post subject: | |
|
AN_Inkling wrote: | Ceglar was our third best ruck, not a terrible decision to move him on. Might have been a handy backup though. |
He was far far far far far better than Witts. _________________ Buon Giorno |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Need to kick this. Let them off the hook with a few misses. _________________ Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Big T wrote: | AN_Inkling wrote: | Ceglar was our third best ruck, not a terrible decision to move him on. Might have been a handy backup though. |
He was far far far far far better than Witts. |
Nah, Witts is a better option than Ceglar. _________________ Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
Big T
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Location: Torino, Italy
|
Post subject: | |
|
I hope in the end he is. But I am sure for this season, where we have a genuine chance, Ceglar would be picked before Witts. This year. When we need him. _________________ Buon Giorno |
|
|
|
|
holdencaulfield
Joined: 12 Apr 2013
|
Post subject: | |
|
How many Ruckmen can you keep on your list? Who will end up as a better player Witts, Grundy or Ceglar? |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
When Ceglar was at Collingwood, he did nothing to justify a seconds game, let alone a senior one. He may have turned into a decent player but if he has, it has exactly nil to do with what he showed while on our list. |
|
|
|
|
collie dog
RIP Shelby 11-10-13
Joined: 07 Jun 2010 Location: Shelby Christmas dog
|
Post subject: | |
|
But don't we have Grundy the Messiah? _________________ Rain or hail, I wag my tail |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Grow up. Its not a question of who gets a kick in this game. The question is which ruckman to build your team around. |
|
|
|
|
Big T
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Location: Torino, Italy
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | When Ceglar was at Collingwood, he did nothing to justify a seconds game, let alone a senior one. He may have turned into a decent player but if he has, it has exactly nil to do with what he showed while on our list. |
I couldn't disagree more.
He was a young tall ruckmen developing and got no chance.
Other players are given an eternity when it is clear they are shit while others are drafted knowing they are shit.
Yagmoor, Clarke, mooney still on the list and should never ever play a game for us. Never. Ceglar is now the starting ruck for the hawks.
I believe it to be a clear mistake and totally foreseeable. _________________ Buon Giorno |
|
|
|
|
|