Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Post Match. Cats down Pies . All comments, please.

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Match
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Lazza 



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 9:34 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Two of Callow, Moyle, Stengel or Ash Johnson would suffice for now.
_________________
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
MickMCG34 



Joined: 03 May 2021


PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 10:44 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Bally12
I’m with you 100%.

_________________
Woodsman forever
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MickMCG34 



Joined: 03 May 2021


PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 10:50 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Bally12
I’m with you 100%.

_________________
Woodsman forever
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 12:56 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

hermie wrote:
...
... if we are predictable to the opposition why are we not predictable to our mids?

Gotta say, I looked at the Grundy HOs vs. Geebung on video and it looks a lot worse than predictable (and worse than it looks live). TBH I'm a bit shocked.


Last edited by K on Wed Jul 21, 2021 10:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 1:17 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

A look at Grundy's hit outs vs. Geebung (from highlights on afl.com.au)...


Q1 1:05 HO to advantage to Crisp.

4:17 centre HO to ground behind him; his direct opponent (Esava) runs on to the loose ball and collects.

4:35 HO to oppo; rebounds off oppo's hands back to him; failed attempt to kick.

4:50 HO to oppo; rebounds off oppo's hands back to him; failed attempt to kick. (Repeat!)

5:08 HO forward & clear of pack but straight to oppo (#30) on his own.

11:30 Shallow throw-in, given as HO but down by the ruckmen's knees and straight to ground.

26:21 HO fisted to ground in clear space; Pendlebury runs and collects ahead of his opponent, so given as 'to advantage'.


Q2 0:03 centre HO forward to JdG & Selwood; ball spills to ground off JdG's hands; JdG runs and collects ahead of Selwood, so given as 'to advantage'.

7:51 centre HO to his left, straight to Narkle in the clear.

18:36 HO to his right from boundary throw-in, straight to Selwood in the clear. (He then tackles Selwood around the neck and Selwood gets the free...)

23:19 Shallow throw-in, given as HO but down by the ruckmen's knees and straight to ground; and it looked like both ruckmen had a piece of it.

25:13 HO below waist after wrestle with opponent, to ground; players chase and oppo picks up.


Q3 0:03 centre HO up in air as he falls; ball in dispute; Parfitt and Narkle collect.

1:46 Throw-in, given as HO but not really; Grundy collects the spillage and goals.

2:52 centre HO to ground; JdG swoops and collects, so 'to advantage'; nice moves by JdG after to get clear.

3:42 HO to left & to ground, vaguely near Poulter, but it bounces up to Narkle.

6:44 Throw-in, supposedly HO, but it looked like Stanley's HO; anyway, goes to ground and ends with oppo.

7:10 Throw-in, supposedly HO, but unclear whose; goes to ground in front of ruckmen; IQ picks up, so 'to advantage'.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
simon tonna 



Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Location: carindale

PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2021 8:52 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

K wrote:
A look at Grundy's hit outs vs. Geebung (from highlights on afl.com.au)...


Q1 1:05 HO to advantage to Crisp.

4:17 centre HO to ground behind him; his direct opponent (Esava) runs on to the loose ball and collects.

4:35 HO to oppo; rebounds off oppo's hands back to him; failed attempt to kick.

4:50 HO to oppo; rebounds off oppo's hands back to him; failed attempt to kick. (Repeat!)

5:08 HO forward & clear of pack but straight to oppo (#30) on his own.

11:30 Shallow throw-in, given as HO but down by the ruckmen's knees and straight to ground.

26:21 HO fisted to ground in clear space; Pendlebury runs and collects ahead of his opponent, so given as 'to advantage'.


Q2 0:03 centre HO forward to JdG & Selwood; ball spills to ground off JdG's hands; JdG runs and collects ahead of Selwood, so given as 'to advantage'.

7:51 centre HO to his left, straight to Narkle in the clear.

18:36 HO to his right from boundary throw-in, straight to Selwood in the clear. (He then tackles Selwood around the neck and Selwood gets the free...)

23:19 Shallow throw-in, given as HO but down by the ruckmen's knees and straight to ground; and it looked like both ruckmen had a piece of it.

25:13 HO below waist after wrestle with opponent, to ground; players chase and oppo picks up.


Q3 0:03 centre HO up in air as he falls; ball in dispute; Parfitt and Narkle collect.

1:46 Throw-in, given as HO but not really; Grundy collects the spillage and goals.

2:52 centre HO to ground; JdG swoops and collects, so 'to advantage'; nice moves by JdG after to get clear.

3:42 HO to left & to ground, vaguely near Poulter, but it bounces up to Narkle.

6:44 Throw-in, supposedly HO, but it looked like Stanley's HO; anyway, goes to ground and ends with oppo.

7:10 Throw-in, supposedly HO, but unclear whose; goes to ground in front of ruckmen; IQ picks up, so 'to advantage'.


I cannot believe how anyone can defend then make up a misnomer by calling him Thor.
The money Grundy is on should keep other clubs well away which as usual backfired and blown up in our face. We are stuck with him now for a seriously long time. People continue to talk about buddy’s long contract and justifiably but imagine if he could stay on the park, it would have been a good deal for Sydney.
What we got in the case of Grundy is the crap that K has clearly outlined above.

_________________
no second chances
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Match All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24
Page 24 of 24   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group