Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
The "What do we get for Beams?" thread

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> The Draft & Trade Moot (DTM) forum
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 65, 66, 67  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GoWoodsmen 



Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:07 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

When I first heard about the Dangerfield play I thought "yeah right".... but to the best of my knowledge the Crows haven't even commented on it... for mine that makes it a serious possibility. If it were a possibility then it's down to what the Crows want from Brisbane. Pick 4 and???

We have to play hard ball. Our club is a business, they have a 2 year contract left on one of the best players in the comp. You do not, even in these circumstances, let him go for anything less than the best. As I said in another thread our age/experience profile has gone waaaaayyy to far to youth/inexperience. We must replace Beams with an experienced player. Pick 4 is irrelevant at this stage I believe.

We shall see I guess.

_________________
Side By Side Forever
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
GoWoodsmen 



Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:11 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Apparently we can forget retaining him... well that's just sh** isn't it.

http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/dayne-beams-will-rebuff-collingwood-attempts-to-retain-him-demanding-trade-to-brisbane-lions/story-fndv8g1a-1227073150293

I actually feel quite angry after that. Is it possible the Pies will say sit the year out instead of dealing??

Sounds to me their sending a few warning shots across the bow of Brisbane. Put something amazing up or forget it, regardless of the humanitarian element in play here.

If he is now demanding Brisbane and won't talk of going to the Suns I sense there is something fishy going on.

Damn I'm really angry now. Get Dangerfield... make it happen.

_________________
Side By Side Forever
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
AN_Inkling 



Joined: 06 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:39 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Bucks wrote:
If Pearce Hanley wanted to come home and play with his brother at Collingwood, Brisbane would be asking for Pendlebury or Beams. They are the players we will be asking for. Its up to Brisbane to work it out. That is their issue, he told ABC Radio.


Looks like maybe Adams isn't Buckley's favourite player Confused.

_________________
Well done boys!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
swoop42 Virgo

Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?


Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Location: The 18

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:42 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

AN_Inkling wrote:
Bucks wrote:
If Pearce Hanley wanted to come home and play with his brother at Collingwood, Brisbane would be asking for Pendlebury or Beams. They are the players we will be asking for. Its up to Brisbane to work it out. That is their issue, he told ABC Radio.


Looks like maybe Adams isn't Buckley's favourite player Confused.


I'm confused by your confusion. Confused

What's the confusion here?

Laughing

_________________
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
AN_Inkling 



Joined: 06 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:50 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

^^Just that if Hanley was coming to Collingwood Brisbane would be asking for Pendlebury or Beams. Maybe they would, but it's not a good comparison to the deal we're trying to strike as it's nowhere near fair price.

Clearly though, Hanley is in his thinking. He'd certainly be a good addition to our backline.

_________________
Well done boys!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:22 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Fire Up wrote:
the suns are starting to get involved with beams. think they are willing to give up early pick and player.

what is swallow and o'meara's contract at?

we have enough talls, we will need a midfielder seeing as swan is almost/is 30

Swallow re-signed this year so he's contracted to the Suns until the end of 2017 and O'Meara re-signed last year which extends his deal with the Suns until the end of 2016.

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Albert Parker 



Joined: 13 Dec 2012


PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:20 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pearce Hanley just had his brother join him in Brisbane. He's not coming to Collingwood unfortunately.

Beams declared his father had beaten cancer 2 weeks ago. That's great news for him, and while I realise there is risk of a relapse, it seems to make it a little less necessary to disappear from Collingwood.

_________________
One team, one dream - the Pies and this year's premiership
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Museman 



Joined: 06 Jul 2009


PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:21 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

AN_Inkling wrote:
^^Just that if Hanley was coming to Collingwood Brisbane would be asking for Pendlebury or Beams. Maybe they would, but it's not a good comparison to the deal we're trying to strike as it's nowhere near fair price.

Clearly though, Hanley is in his thinking. He'd certainly be a good addition to our backline.


You think? Embarassed

Not a very good negotiating technique, he's made Hanley sound the equal of beams....

Feels like amateur hour at Collingwood, if I smell blood the wolves almost certainly do.............
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
GoWoodsmen 



Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 10:11 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Albert Parker wrote:
Pearce Hanley just had his brother join him in Brisbane. He's not coming to Collingwood unfortunately.

Beams declared his father had beaten cancer 2 weeks ago. That's great news for him, and while I realise there is risk of a relapse, it seems to make it a little less necessary to disappear from Collingwood.


If this is true, what the hell is going on? Sorry but if that's the case then that strengthens our position if you ask me, regardless of Beams' wishes.

_________________
Side By Side Forever
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
AN_Inkling 



Joined: 06 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 10:22 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

^^The word is that he's already had a relapse.
_________________
Well done boys!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
jackcass Cancer



Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:27 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

RudeBoy wrote:
stui magpie wrote:
I'd prefer pick 7 and a player from GC, lots more talent to pick from who've done the yards and are ready to do soon if not now. Much better IMO.

If Brisbane is the preferred option I have NFI what players they have that we may want. Not sure if just taking an inferior (to Dayne) midfielder is the way to go, we have enough of those already.


The problem is stui that the Suns have not declared any interest in trading for Beams.


Give it time. Players of Beams quality don't become available all too often.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
jackcass Cancer



Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:36 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

GoWoodsmen wrote:
Albert Parker wrote:
Pearce Hanley just had his brother join him in Brisbane. He's not coming to Collingwood unfortunately.

Beams declared his father had beaten cancer 2 weeks ago. That's great news for him, and while I realise there is risk of a relapse, it seems to make it a little less necessary to disappear from Collingwood.


If this is true, what the hell is going on? Sorry but if that's the case then that strengthens our position if you ask me, regardless of Beams' wishes.


Rumour is that his father may not have been completely honest with the family when he was claiming he'd beaten cancer and only last week disclosed the reality of his situation, and that apparently is not good. Obviously no public statements so it remains guess work at this stage.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Damien Aquarius

Me Noah & Flynn @ the G


Joined: 21 Jan 1999
Location: Croydon Vic

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:09 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Simply must play hardball on this one. Lions reckon pick 4 and that's it. Reckon they can wait a year. Well f@ck em! They can wait.
_________________
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
axl13 



Joined: 01 Apr 2013


PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:37 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

if he plays for us next year we will receive bugger all in the free agency for him. So we have to get the best possible trade this season for him
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:44 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

axl13 wrote:
if he plays for us next year we will receive bugger all in the free agency for him. So we have to get the best possible trade this season for him


Yep. I reckon that is on the money.

Otherwise we hope like hell that the Lions do worse than 4th bottom next year.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> The Draft & Trade Moot (DTM) forum All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 65, 66, 67  Next
Page 3 of 67   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group