Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
what do you think of the rule changes?

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  

what do you think of the rule changes?
Not Sure
4%
 4%  [ 2 ]
Not Sure
4%
 4%  [ 2 ]
I Like Them
14%
 14%  [ 7 ]
I Like Them
14%
 14%  [ 7 ]
I Hate Them
4%
 4%  [ 2 ]
I Hate Them
4%
 4%  [ 2 ]
Stop screwing with the rules AFL
28%
 28%  [ 14 ]
Stop screwing with the rules AFL
28%
 28%  [ 14 ]
Total Votes : 50

Author Message
I@n S 



Joined: 09 Sep 1999
Location: Pakenham

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 1:25 am
Post subject: what do you think of the rule changes?Reply with quote

For those of you who don't know them from what I can gather the new rules are:
1, you can't hand ball to yourself
and 2, you can't just grab the ball out of the ruck in any bounce situation you have to tap or punch it away.

Personaly I hate them. Handballing to yourself is a still in itself because you have to be quick enough to get on the end of your own handball.
No2, well this is a joke. Again its a skill in itself. It means you are good enough the fend of your oposing ruckman go get the ball. It's also a stupid new rules because what if you can see on the oposition players or no one at all in that direction? You have to tap it and then takel or run after the ball again. Stupid if you ask me
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
Proud Pies Aquarius



Joined: 22 Feb 2003
Location: Knox-ish

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 2:06 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Watching the replay i noticed (as did the commentators) that one of the Richmond team handballed to himself and got away with it. If they are going to bring in new rules, they need to administer them correctly, especially in the opening rounds.

I think i need to see a few rounds of these new rules to actually get a feel for them. But i did like Buck's 9 pointer tonight.....what? that rule wasn't included??????
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
I@n S 



Joined: 09 Sep 1999
Location: Pakenham

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 2:09 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

No the 9 points didn't come in. Thank god Smile I know we've got so many players who can kick outside 50 but I still don't want the game to be messed with
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
Proud Pies Aquarius



Joined: 22 Feb 2003
Location: Knox-ish

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 2:10 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah I@n, i know it didn't come in, i was just teasing Smile) but they still should have given Buck's 9 for that goal!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
I@n S 



Joined: 09 Sep 1999
Location: Pakenham

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 2:22 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

LOL ok. yeah it would be nice. GO PIES
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
bokka Cancer



Joined: 11 Apr 1999
Location: NY, Ex Land of Brave and Free

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 5:35 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the game should be able to evolve to an extent, but definitely not anywhere near the extent they are stuffing around with it these days. Not being able to grab out of the ruck seems ridiculous to me, what is the rationale for that???? Unless it's to prevent Spider Burton from totally dominating but he doesn't anyway, Primus and Darcy who are relatively short do it more.

I also don't know why they are obsesssed with making the game more attacking and high scoring with such things as deliberate out of bounds etc. Think about it.... what is the most popular form of football in the world by far? (Christ knows why, but anyway if goals are made too easy it takes the excitement away - of course in soccer it's *too* hard to get goals but aussie rules is miles away from that). I think it comes from the policy of marketting the game overseas and the misguided idea that more goals = more excitement and entertainment value. A tight low scoring game can be just as or more exciting like last year's GF.

PS how do you vote for the poll?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Fradam Virgo



Joined: 21 Jun 1999
Location: Bendigo, Victoria

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:08 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the rule changes worked ok.
_________________
Do I look like the tech?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
I@n S 



Joined: 09 Sep 1999
Location: Pakenham

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 3:03 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

bokka wrote:
I think the game should be able to evolve to an extent, but definitely not anywhere near the extent they are stuffing around with it these days. Not being able to grab out of the ruck seems ridiculous to me, what is the rationale for that???? Unless it's to prevent Spider Burton from totally dominating but he doesn't anyway, Primus and Darcy who are relatively short do it more.

I also don't know why they are obsesssed with making the game more attacking and high scoring with such things as deliberate out of bounds etc. Think about it.... what is the most popular form of football in the world by far? (Christ knows why, but anyway if goals are made too easy it takes the excitement away - of course in soccer it's *too* hard to get goals but aussie rules is miles away from that). I think it comes from the policy of marketting the game overseas and the misguided idea that more goals = more excitement and entertainment value. A tight low scoring game can be just as or more exciting like last year's GF.

PS how do you vote for the poll?


I understand the bounce one now. Its not that you can't grab the ball its just that you have to puch or kick it straight away otherwise you're going to be done for holding the ball.
Maybe a good change but the umpires didn't pick it out every time it happened last night so they don't have a clue as usual!!!!!!!

Anyway I didn't think of the marketing part bokka good point. Oh to vote you select the option you want from the top and click the submit button.
Smile
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
bokka Cancer



Joined: 11 Apr 1999
Location: NY, Ex Land of Brave and Free

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 5:13 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

OK thanks I.S. - now the voting option has disappeared altogether - you probly only get one chance to vote.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
bokka Cancer



Joined: 11 Apr 1999
Location: NY, Ex Land of Brave and Free

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 5:16 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Correction I just figured it out and voted
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
I@n S 



Joined: 09 Sep 1999
Location: Pakenham

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 6:38 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

ok what did you vote for out of interest?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
Black_White 






PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:39 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Another new rule.
When a player takes more than 15 - 20 seconds to kick the ball, as Tarks did in the first qtr, the ump screams "play on".
Now, why is this rule not applied to players such as Lloyd? He is allowed tothrow grass in the air, generally waste a minute or more, no penalty!
The rule has no wording to seperate backline play to forward line play.

-Craig
Back to top   
 
Cam Capricorn

Nick's BB Member #166


Joined: 10 May 2002
Location: Springvale

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 11:34 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

i like the new rules. for a start, its gonna hurt Port Power ALOT because the last time Primus got a decent hitout was when his mum whacked him for getting in trouble at school. He's a grabber and he will pay. Mind you Stunner is a grabber as well, also Darcy. It think its a good rule because ruckman last year just grabbed the ball and held up play if they couldnt get it away to their advantage. The handball rule also is good because it will teach Leon to bloody grab it and give it to someone instead of playing with himself like a 15 yr old in the shower.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
creedymagpie Aquarius



Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Location: Berwick

PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2003 12:21 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I personally like the new rules especially the ruckman cant grab it out of the ruck!

It annoyed me all last year when Primus kept taking it out of the ruck and getting tackled just to waste time. I think the rule is way overdue.

I was getting annoyed by the umpires all game as they were giving bitchmond everything, but i almost cheered when they pinged Mckee, he knew the new rules and was given the consequences, but of course he almost did it again 2 minutes later.

_________________
I love Danny Allsopp, Danny Allsopp loves me!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger  
I@n S 



Joined: 09 Sep 1999
Location: Pakenham

PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2003 2:47 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

the new rules won't be good untill the umpires call them like their suppost to
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group