View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ed from WA
Joined: 08 Aug 2002 Location: northam WA
|
Post subject: trial by video | |
|
Can that bloke who hit didak across the nose with a forearm be reported on video?
or is the fact that the blind mice called play on enough to let him off?
i reckon we could use that whack in tarrants defence.
if its ok for one it should be ok for all.
and as for the umpy saying to tarks that he would normally get a 50 but he was letting the crows off this time,after he was decked after marking showed to me that the umps didnt want us to win either. |
|
|
|
|
MissMagpie_20
BUCKS SIMPLY THE BEST!
Joined: 02 Oct 2002 Location: Ballarat
|
Post subject: | |
|
Good theory Ed but this is Taz were talking about. He never gets off at the tribunal, he never gets a free kick, he gets raped by the opposition every week (lucky bastards). My boy never gets a friggen break. _________________ Those with the most invested are the last to surrender!
So when i'm lying in my bed, thoughts running through my head and i feel that love is dead...
IM LOVING BUCKLEY INSTEAD! |
|
|
|
|
where's kent butcher
Joined: 30 May 2000 Location: melbourne,Victoria,Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
No he'll get off. Was it only me he noticed that it was old Glass Jaw Tyson Edwards who did it? Funny I recall a certain Collinwood player getting 2 weeks and missing a Grand Final for doing it to him but apparently he can do it and not even give away a free kick, wanker! |
|
|
|
|
|