Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
SCG Test. Australia v. New Zealand.

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Nick's Sports Bar
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Donny Aries

Formerly known as MAGFAN8.


Joined: 04 Aug 2002
Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia

PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:21 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

K wrote:
Oz getting a bit lazy?


Not a problem, when you're 450+ and NZ having to bat against 3 of the best quicks in the World ... AND arguably the best Offie (with Ashwin), and the wicket taking spin.

_________________
Donny.

It's a game. Enjoy it. Very Happy


Last edited by Donny on Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:21 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

All out for 454. NZ are out of it, again, before they come in to bat.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:23 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

NZ were out of it once team selections were made, mostly forced by illness and injury.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:44 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

And a complete absence of basic batting aptitude.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:51 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Blundell did very well that over - he could have been out to Cummins 4 times but wasn’t.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
23 YIPPEE!!! 

YIPPEE 23!!!


Joined: 24 Jul 2019


PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 5:11 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

they are doing ok NZ
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 3:59 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies4shaw wrote:
And a complete absence of basic batting aptitude.

That's shared by all cricket nations. It's the Death of Test Batting. As Langer said of Marnus in December:

"... he actually moves his feet, got footwork patterns. It's a dying art in the game of cricket with the amount of T20 and one-day cricket guys play now."

Certainly there was a shocking lack of footwork in Smith's dismissal. The side-on footage looked awful. He just left his feet rooted to the crease and groped at the ball with the bat.


And English batsmen are having a fine old time (not!) in S. Africa [ http://magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?p=1948007#1948007 ].


One sign that a nation's batting production line has broken is when it selects two or three wicketkeepers in the same Test side. e.g. There are five (okay, 4 1/2) keepers playing in this Test.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 10:48 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Lyon bowls Blundell. 1/68.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 11:44 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

1/109. NZ still batting. There’s a surprise. They might yet make 200.

Looks like getting the inept Williamson out of the side in favour of the slightly less inept Raval has made the difference.

Sometimes your best changes are the forced ones.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 11:59 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Raval given lbw to Lyon. He reviews. And the wicket stands NZ loses a review and Raval is gone for 31. 2/117.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Donny Aries

Formerly known as MAGFAN8.


Joined: 04 Aug 2002
Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia

PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:01 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Lyon has 2. Ravel out, lbw.

2/117.

_________________
Donny.

It's a game. Enjoy it. Very Happy
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Donny Aries

Formerly known as MAGFAN8.


Joined: 04 Aug 2002
Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia

PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:02 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

BANG. Latham (49) out !!

Cummins wicket.

_________________
Donny.

It's a game. Enjoy it. Very Happy


Last edited by Donny on Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:02 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

And now Cummins has Latham for 49.

Will they reach 175?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:13 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

K wrote:
...
One sign that a nation's batting production line has broken is when it selects two or three wicketkeepers in the same Test side. e.g. There are five (okay, 4 1/2) keepers playing in this Test.

Err... they claimed Phillips is a keeper too. Shocked I must investigate.* That'd be six wicketkeepers playing in this Test then. A clear sign of the death of batting (and wicketkeeping).

Much was made of India playing four keepers (Dhoni, Pant, Karthik, Rahul) in the ODI WC against Bangladesh, but I don't know the most they've played in a Test. (Saha is their Test keeper.)


* Yes, he's listed everywhere as a wicketkeeper batsman. 7 out of his 11 T20Is have been as keeper. I wonder if he keeps for Auckland in first-class cricket.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:56 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

3/141 at lunch. 175 still looks a genuinely achievable target for these lads.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Nick's Sports Bar All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 4 of 8   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group