Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
ICC rankings and “declining” standards

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Nick's Sports Bar
 
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:18 am
Post subject: ICC rankings and “declining” standardsReply with quote

Honestly, we all know that Ricky and especially guys like Gilchrist played at the birth of T20, when no one knew or cared how best to do the slogathon, so their stats show that. The same is true of players at the birth of ODIs.

........

On current players, are you admitting that ICC rankings shouldn't be taken too seriously, as I've tried to convince you and Donny for years? Because, as you see above, your "spuds" are very highly ranked.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:54 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

It will probably be difficult to “convince” me about anything, because I don’t much care. We all know that Smith is the best batsman to take the field since Bradman retired and that Finch and Warner are the best T20 players in the history of that form of the game. If the ratings don’t reflect those obvious facts, it is a problem with the ratings system.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 8:02 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Smith is a flat-track bully, grade 1. (But that's talking Tests, and this is a T20 thread.)
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 8:17 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

No, he isn’t. He’s a genuine all-time great. If he were batting in a decent Test batting line-up (say with Ponsford and Woodfull taking the shine off the ball for him), his average would probably be well over 100. Also, if he hadn’t been picked as a bowler before his batting technique reached standard, his average would be much higher than it is. Even cricinfo describes him in its profile summary of him as the best Australian batsman since Bradman. You remind me a bit of my Dad trying to insist that Bill O’Reilly was better than Warne and that Fothergill was better than Daicos.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 8:19 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

You might be on better ground if you hadn't insisted recently that there was no evidence that Test batting standards have crashed. The evidence is overwhelming and frightening (and, to make this vaguely related to this thread, may be partly due to T20s).
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 8:47 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I don’t accept that. That’s just another bee in your bonnet. Smith stand out like a beacon.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:38 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies4shaw wrote:
I don’t accept that. ...

Err... what don't you accept? You mean you agree that Test batting has collapsed? Or disagree (in which case you're agreeing with what I wrote above)? Or are you neutral on that question?


If it's a bee in my bonnet, it's because it's an existential threat to the game. It goes hand in hand with deliberately making Test pitches dead, so the incompetent batsmen don't vanish within three days. Anyone who cares about the game should care about this problem.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:14 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

No, it isn’t.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:25 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

So if, in the worst case, the art of Test batting is simply lost forever, you'd be totally happy as long as the game still exists and there's slogging and slogathons to make up for it. Amazing.

I assume that this worst case is not yet upon us, because stuff goes in cycles, so in the future there may be a rebirth of skills that are virtually nonexistent now.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:47 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

The art of batting isn’t “lost forever”. Statistically, we know that Smith is the best batsman of the last 70 years - and he may yet end his career as the best performed batsman of all time. There are some other good ones, too.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 11:28 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think it's lost forever. That's the worst case if the trend of the past couple of decades continues.

Smith is not in the top three Oz batsmen of even recent times.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:27 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^ Statistically, he is better than all of them. He's not in my top 20 favourite batsmen of all time to watch - but that's not the issue.

He may not, in your opinion, be the most elegant or stylish or powerful or whatever else you like since Bradman but his numbers put everyone else completely in the shade. He's the single greatest batsman any of us have ever seen.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:39 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Not true at all. This is not about being "stylish". For starters, your beliefs require head in sand about the deliberately dead pitches groundsmen are bullied into producing nowadays, but maybe I should continue this topic in one of the many Smith threads (I guess the most recent one), not here...
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:29 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

You're going to have to provide some statistical basis for this stuff if you want me to continue to engage. There is, in my respectful opinion, absolutely no basis for your contention that pitches are "better" now than they were at other times in the last 60 years. There have always been "roads" rolled out for particular purposes. Or pitches prepared to suit the home team's strengths. In a way, it's much less problematic now than it was formerly, because there is so much more cricket actually played in each Test (I don't know what the precise average is but there's probably an extra 50 to 60 six-ball overs available in every modern Test) that a good team can get a result that in the 60s or 70s would have been a draw.

That's not a reason to belittle the efforts of the top batsmen who scored heavily on wickets in past eras. Nor is it a reason to belittle the efforts of the top batsmen of the modern era. Where I do think some modern averages have been inflated is where some players get to play disproportionately-often against spud teams or disproportionately-often on docile home pitches that suit them (eg, some of the sub-continental players). Smth, of course, isn't one of those.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:27 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

We know Neil Harvey reckons everything was better in his day, but he has a point about covered vs. uncovered pitches.

In more modern times, the stuff rolled out nowadays we used to associate only with Adelaide Oval just a few decades ago. Then it was obvious starting in the 00s (and getting worse and worse) that all pitches were going that way, and they started rolling out excuses. Drought, they said. Has there been unending drought in the cricketing world for the whole of this century? Whatever the excuses or their validity, they wouldn't need excuses if there were nothing to excuse.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Nick's Sports Bar All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Page 1 of 1   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group