View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Skids
Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175
|
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
What does having polygamy have to do with domestic violence? (Unless you are taking a broader, structural approach to relationships between gender inequality and domestic violence, in which case this is a surprisingly feminist approach to the topic from you. I wonder what could have prompted that? )
Liked the guy in the audience with the dyed orange beard, though. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
Wokko
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Polygamy and other multi partner arrangements aren't in and of themselves abusive. There are statistics out there regarding domestic violence and certain groups in society that would be worth exploring but I'm not sure this is abuse per se.
The biggest issue with polygamy is it creates an underclass of men who cannot partner up and groups of angry young men without families aren't something you want in any society (see the random acts of violence by outcast men against women for example). Having the top dog with multiple wives is a throwback to evolutionary savagery that we can probably do without (the odd poly relationship here and there aside). |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
^ I think it's one of those issues where I totally understand the structural critiques (I certainly agree that it's a throwback to the bad old days of patriarchal control and deeply unequal in conception; that guy in the clip probably wouldn't be so enthused about sharing his own wife around, for instance!) but don't necessarily oppose it in practice, providing everyone's acting voluntarily and there's no coercion. I'm not sure I'd actually make it illegal, as it is here – and, indeed, am inclined to support multiple marriage for those in more, er, "modern" polyamorous relationships. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
K
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
|
Post subject: | |
|
Wokko wrote: | ... an underclass of men who cannot partner up and groups of angry young men without families ... |
Should young men really be angry just because they cannot partner up? |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
Perhaps not, but is "should" really relevant here? When you combine (a) the natural human drive for love and intimacy with (b) the socialised concept of success equalling getting laid, being in a long-term relationship or some combination thereof, and throw in (c) mixed messages about the male gender role and (d) the loneliness, disconnection and loss of meaning that has been brought about by modern society, it's hardly surprising that unwanted, socially disadvantaged single men would feel angry and disillusioned. Whatever toxic ideas have been thrown in the mix there to make things worse (such as assigning status to conventional attractiveness), that's a lot for an individual to deal with, and I'm not particularly surprised that a lot of males struggle to deal with it healthily.
I think one of the remedies for all that is for our society to shift the way it looks at relationships, by promoting non-sexual intimacy (this is something a lot of men struggle with) and sexual liberation, and I honestly think if more people who feel capable of doing so can reject monogamy and embrace open relationships, that would be a big step forward. Of course that has little to do with traditional polygamy, which has little to do with freedom or equality, but I think there's a lot to be said for pluralism and allowing people to pursue the kinds of relationships that feel right for them. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
^
IIRC China's 1 child policy which was in place for decades and resulted in a gender population tilt toward more men than women caused flow on problems a few years back _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
Not to mention shitloads of dumped little girls. What a $£$%^%%$ disgusting load of dictators control that country. They allow them to contaminate food with shit that should never be swallowec and then come and destroy our baby formula markets, the so called dog festivals, just a disgusting ... _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
^ To be fair, the dog festivals are a purely regional thing and not exactly a dictate of the regime. It's a big country. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
David wrote: | ^ To be fair, the dog festivals are a purely regional thing and not exactly a dictate of the regime. It's a big country. |
It’s a lot of dogs.
And they skin them alive outside of the festival. google it _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
^ I'm not disputing the facts, TP, just your conflation of the regime's authoritarianism with backward regional cultural traditions. Apples and oranges. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
I’m just in a xmaspissedoff mood, China copped it! But still, not undeserved! _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
Wokko
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
David wrote: | Perhaps not, but is "should" really relevant here? When you combine (a) the natural human drive for love and intimacy with (b) the socialised concept of success equalling getting laid, being in a long-term relationship or some combination thereof, and throw in (c) mixed messages about the male gender role and (d) the loneliness, disconnection and loss of meaning that has been brought about by modern society, it's hardly surprising that unwanted, socially disadvantaged single men would feel angry and disillusioned. Whatever toxic ideas have been thrown in the mix there to make things worse (such as assigning status to conventional attractiveness), that's a lot for an individual to deal with, and I'm not particularly surprised that a lot of males struggle to deal with it healthily.
I think one of the remedies for all that is for our society to shift the way it looks at relationships, by promoting non-sexual intimacy (this is something a lot of men struggle with) and sexual liberation, and I honestly think if more people who feel capable of doing so can reject monogamy and embrace open relationships, that would be a big step forward. Of course that has little to do with traditional polygamy, which has little to do with freedom or equality, but I think there's a lot to be said for pluralism and allowing people to pursue the kinds of relationships that feel right for them. |
Women have a higher sexual value than men do, by socially pushing 'open' relationships you just exacerbate the problem. The top men will have their picks of women who are willing to share them and the 'undesirable' men will become an angry, bitter underclass. We see it already in the man child "beta male" who wont work full time, lives with parents and spends all their time on hobbies and frivolous pursuits. The problem comes when it's not passive types who are left on the shelf but the angry and violent ones. Monogamy is exactly what society came up with to mitigate this issue, it creates stability, productivity and purpose. Sure our primitive biology doesn't exactly like it but it's the best way to ensure a stable, prosperous society. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
Geezus!!!
and your view on "old maids"??? _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
Wokko
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Depends on the 'old maid' I guess. When it's a woman who really wanted a family and husband and goes off the deep end with 100 cats it's legitimately sad. Some people though are just happier by themselves, not many, but some.
You have to by necessity talk in generalisations when discussing entire societies and social structures though.
I think with the rise in men not engaging in society and marriage and women spending their prime years 'partying' (yes that's a euphemism) we'll end up with a lot of bitter, alone old people who thought that multi partner relationships or playing World of Warcraft until they're 40 being supported by mum and dad were positive life choices. |
|
|
|
|
|