View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: Pre Match. Pies v. Cats. Semi-final | |
|
Saturday, 10 October. The Gabba. 7.40
Collingwood v. Geelong.
B: Jack Crisp, Jordan Roughead, Jack Madgen
HB: Brayden Maynard, Darcy Moore, Isaac Quaynor
C: Chris Mayne, Adam Treloar, Josh Daicos
HF: Will Hoskin-Elliott, Brody Mihocek, Josh Thomas
F: Jamie Elliott, Mason Cox, Jordan De Goey
Foll: Brodie Grundy, Taylor Adams, Scott Pendlebury
Int: Jaidyn Stephenson, John Noble, Levi Greenwood, Darcy Cameron
Emerg: Will Kelly, Tyler Brown, Travis Varcoe, Mark Keane
Let's hear ya !!
Last edited by Pies4shaw on Fri Oct 09, 2020 6:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
So, the "reward" for beating the 5th-placed team on their home ground is that we play the losing 4th-placed team on a 2-day shorter break (them 9 days, us 7). This seems to me to be an extraordinary advantage to give for a match that one would ordinarily expect to be played between two teams that finished next to each other on the ladder.
Great effort by Collingwood to make it to the second week of the finals - but the fixturing just doesn't get any fairer. |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010 Location: Living rent free
|
Post subject: | |
|
Would you have preferred us to play Friday night?
What other choice given Geelong played Thursday? |
|
|
|
|
Cuthbert Collingwood
Once was on fire, now all at sea
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 Location: The BBC (Brunswick Bowling Club)
|
Post subject: | |
|
A 7 day break is better than 9 after the week off _________________ McRae for Governor-General! |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Isn't the answer that Geelong should never have played Thursday? West Coast and Collingwood had the longest travel to their game and, inevitably for the winner, back. No team should get such a huge advantage in an important final because they lost. You expect this game, in most situations, to be 4th versus 5th. It looks to have been fixtured with a view to giving Port Adelaide a huge leg-up into a prelim if they lost. Instead, Geelong, by dint of finishing 4th, somehow reaps an advantage from being out-classed by the top team. Meanwhile, the winning team in the 6th v 7th shambles doesn't travel and only has one-day less preparation than its next opponent. The winner of 6 v 7 should not get a better run than the winner of 5 v 8. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Cuthbert Collingwood wrote: | A 7 day break is better than 9 after the week off |
Is it when the team coming off the 7th day break has had to fly to and from Perth? |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
No changes this week. Stick with the same warriors who won last night. Pies by 23 points! |
|
|
|
|
Ronnie McKeowns boots
Ronnie Mckeowns boots
Joined: 27 Jul 2020
|
Post subject: | |
|
Don't know about, might be one tall too many for the humid Gabba conditions.... _________________ "You hate a mean man, a grasping man, a man who wants everything and gives nothing. That’s Collingwood. They are a law unto themselves"
Jack 'Captain Blood' Dyer |
|
|
|
|
woodys_world69
Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Location: Brisbane
|
Post subject: | |
|
horses for courses.
the putty tats dont have nic nat.
and Cox did look better without having to go in the midfield. I dont think bucks is overally happy with his engine capacity this year.
Geelong do have good defenders as well that know when to zone off and intercept.
tough choices this week i suspect. but taking 1 less ruck gives us 1 more midfielder rotation during the match.
and what if we get an injury during the game...
but we did smash geelong earlier in the year without cox or cameron, and de goey kicked 5... |
|
|
|
|
tbaker
Joined: 02 Jul 2018 Location: Q19 Southern Stand MCG
|
Post subject: | |
|
Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote: | Don't know about, might be one tall too many for the humid Gabba conditions.... |
Yes, I don't think we can go in with as many talls...can't drop Cox or Grundy. Cameron doesn't deserve to be dropped, so sure is a massive dilemma... _________________ I find your lack of faith disturbing |
|
|
|
|
tbaker
Joined: 02 Jul 2018 Location: Q19 Southern Stand MCG
|
Post subject: | |
|
woodys_world69 wrote: | horses for courses.
the putty tats dont have nic nat.
and Cox did look better without having to go in the midfield. I dont think bucks is overally happy with his engine capacity this year.
Geelong do have good defenders as well that know when to zone off and intercept.
tough choices this week i suspect. but taking 1 less ruck gives us 1 more midfielder rotation during the match.
and what if we get an injury during the game...
but we did smash geelong earlier in the year without cox or cameron, and de goey kicked 5... |
Yes, good points. As much as I'd love to, I feel we can't go into the next match with the same setup - it will likely bring us undone _________________ I find your lack of faith disturbing |
|
|
|
|
Leggie
Bucks for PM.
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Location: Perth
|
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
i believe Selwood has had surgery on the tendon already hasnt he? that will be sore even with drugs.
as for the thug :"Hawkins can accept a $1500 fine with an early guilty plea and is free to play next weekend." bugger!!! thats a cup of coffee to these tools.
in saying that we can take the cats. i know we can. And if we play like last night, it could be the 1st 1/4 of the 2010 prelim all over again. That is my favourite of all time games, and i have watched that quarter so so many times!! No guarantee's, but im a lot more confident than i was 5 min before ball up yesterday! thats not saying much though!! i mean im still like, PINCH ME!!
cmon Pies, this would just make my year!! _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
woodys_world69 wrote: | horses for courses.
the putty tats dont have nic nat.
and Cox did look better without having to go in the midfield. I dont think bucks is overally happy with his engine capacity this year.
Geelong do have good defenders as well that know when to zone off and intercept.
tough choices this week i suspect. but taking 1 less ruck gives us 1 more midfielder rotation during the match.
and what if we get an injury during the game...
but we did smash geelong earlier in the year without cox or cameron, and de goey kicked 5... |
They WILL bring Rata back in; it was sheer idiocy to drop him.
Scott knows this now.
Their likely rucks will be Stanley and Rata, and i'd have Cameron rucking at least half the night against them; relieving Grundy for whatever reason. _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
Cam
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002 Location: Springvale
|
Post subject: | |
|
Shame Sidey couldn't come in for a JT for example. Much might depend on the Gabba night air humidity over the next week. Despite losing to Port I think we got renewed belief that we could mix it with the big boys, and a chain reaction might have started the week before with big Coxy's bounce. That mentality has permeated our gameplay since.
After a team win like that it's harder to get dropped than get included as every guy on the field contributed something special at some point of the game to tip the balance back our way.
Grundy is a victim of his own 2018-19 form and now, his contract. He had a solid game with many important wins but we can all see he is not impacting full-game like he was over the last couple of years. The guts of our coaching team to allow Cameron that last bounce... significantly will do alot for Cameron. Brodie though.
Importantly we still have more upside, hopefully we showcase some more of that. Render Dangerfield ineffective by giving him touches in non-key parts of the ground like we did earlier this year could go a long way to winning this game. _________________ Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
|