 |
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
K
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| Should NB consider banning the players from having unprotected baby time in August & September, so they won't risk catching some illness from their offspring? |
|
|
|
 |
think positive 
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| CarringbushCigar wrote: | | think positive wrote: | | Soooooo his best year as captain, we miss the premiership by 90 seconds, we all acknowledge he has been playing injured and then sick, butttttt you want to trade him in! Well ok then, makes perfect sense.....NOT! |
Have another beer.
I didn't say how i rated his previous years.
I also said if he thinks he can be even better than fine - go again.
But if any doubt - Tay looks ready and Scotty can have more of the homelife he enjoys so much.
There is nothing to argue about. |
was that necessary? did it give you a little shiver of joy? go you
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
Pipes1970
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Pendles has earned the right to make the call on his captaincy when he is ready.
10 top 5 finishes in the Copeland in 13 years including five wins means he will go down as one of all time greats of this club.
If Pendles thought that the captaincy was going to somehow effect his performance or penalize the team somehow he would be the first to put his hand up and pass it on.
Any talk of his decline is way off the mark.
The only problem Pendles has is that he makes it look too easy so people think he has lost a step
_________________
It doesn't matter what happens.... I just love this bloody club! |
|
|
|
|
Tannin 
Can't remember
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania
|
| Post subject: | |
|
The thing that was not necessary was two or three people here getting shouty and hysterical about a perfectly decent and respectful discussion of a perfectly reasonable and indeed timely question.
_________________
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives! |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pipes1970 wrote: | Pendles has earned the right to make the call on his captaincy when he is ready.
10 top 5 finishes in the Copeland in 13 years including five wins means he will go down as one of all time greats of this club.
If Pendles thought that the captaincy was going to somehow effect his performance or penalize the team somehow he would be the first to put his hand up and pass it on.
Any talk of his decline is way off the mark.
The only problem Pendles has is that he makes it look too easy so people think he has lost a step |
This especially the last line
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
Presti35 
Dick Lee for Legend Status
Joined: 05 Oct 2001
Location: London, England
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Quote: | | Should Pendles step aside? |
No.
_________________
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned! |
|
|
|
|
Mr Miyagi
Joined: 14 Sep 2018
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Pendles was instrumental in getting De Goey fit and firing.
Agree with Pipes1970, Pendles leads like he plays -- he makes it look easy to people not paying attention. Let him make the call. Besides, we have other leaders on the ground and around the club. |
|
|
|
|
BBHS 
bbhs
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Location: Bellarine
|
| Post subject: | |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
K
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| ^ Were you particularly enchanted by Flip's on-knees handball? |
|
|
|
|
BBHS
bbhs
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Location: Bellarine
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| ha ha I didn't even notice it until now. Seedsman's defensive effort is impressive |
|
|
|
|
5 from the wing on debut
Joined: 27 May 2016
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Tannin wrote: | | The thing that was not necessary was two or three people here getting shouty and hysterical about a perfectly decent and respectful discussion of a perfectly reasonable and indeed timely question. |
That's what I thought as well.
The premise of this topic was whether Pendles should step aside. That is, make the decision himself.
It's funny that the first person complaining about discussion of the captain being sacked was also the first person to even raise the issue of him being sacked. Understandable why the have another beer comment was made. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| 5 from the wing on debut wrote: | | Tannin wrote: | | The thing that was not necessary was two or three people here getting shouty and hysterical about a perfectly decent and respectful discussion of a perfectly reasonable and indeed timely question. |
That's what I thought as well.
The premise of this topic was whether Pendles should step aside. That is, make the decision himself.
It's funny that the first person complaining about discussion of the captain being sacked was also the first person to even raise the issue of him being sacked. Understandable why the have another beer comment was made. |
Since you went back once to get that info go back and have another read, the sarcasm was an inch thick!
Just imagine Pendles ventures in to have a look and sees “should Pendles step aside?” I know insensitivity is a male trait, but getting not getting offended isn’t, and he does not deserve that. That’s why I , and I presume the others, want the thread shut down. It’s disrespectful and an insult to Pendles brave gutsy performance this year, under various forms of duress.
A couple of seasons ago I said he wasn’t a captains arsehole after one shitty defeat, and since then I have changed my tune and stated it clearly on here, many a time, that now I see what others saw all along. Yes he is a very different captain to Maxy, who I just loved. He has the integrity to stand aside when he knows he is done, of that I have no doubt.
But once again, the reason I’m offended is because it pisses me off the insensitive keyboard warriors have the audacity to start threads like this just days after we lost a grand final by 5 points and 90 $£$%^%%$ seconds, a grand final none of us could have dreamed we would be in.
And just to finish, if you feel the need to have a crack at me have the balls to name me. I don’t need the Dutch courage of alcohol to make my point.
Quite ironically, CHEERS!
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
5 from the wing on debut
Joined: 27 May 2016
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| think positive wrote: | | 5 from the wing on debut wrote: | | Tannin wrote: | | The thing that was not necessary was two or three people here getting shouty and hysterical about a perfectly decent and respectful discussion of a perfectly reasonable and indeed timely question. |
That's what I thought as well.
The premise of this topic was whether Pendles should step aside. That is, make the decision himself.
It's funny that the first person complaining about discussion of the captain being sacked was also the first person to even raise the issue of him being sacked. Understandable why the have another beer comment was made. |
Since you went back once to get that info go back and have another read, the sarcasm was an inch thick!
Just imagine Pendles ventures in to have a look and sees “should Pendles step aside?” I know insensitivity is a male trait, but getting not getting offended isn’t, and he does not deserve that. That’s why I , and I presume the others, want the thread shut down. It’s disrespectful and an insult to Pendles brave gutsy performance this year, under various forms of duress.
A couple of seasons ago I said he wasn’t a captains arsehole after one shitty defeat, and since then I have changed my tune and stated it clearly on here, many a time, that now I see what others saw all along. Yes he is a very different captain to Maxy, who I just loved. He has the integrity to stand aside when he knows he is done, of that I have no doubt.
But once again, the reason I’m offended is because it pisses me off the insensitive keyboard warriors have the audacity to start threads like this just days after we lost a grand final by 5 points and 90 $£$%^%%$ seconds, a grand final none of us could have dreamed we would be in.
And just to finish, if you feel the need to have a crack at me have the balls to name me. I don’t need the Dutch courage of alcohol to make my point.
Quite ironically, CHEERS! |
I have no idea what your name is. Tell me your name and I will name you. I just think of you as the bug person due to your avatar.
Why are you so offended? Don't you know how professional sporting clubs work? The position of every player is thoroughly reviewed at the end of every season. The issue that has been considered here will have also been considered by not only our club, but by our captain as well. I don't think he needs you to tell him whether he can do that or not.
For the record I think that he should remain captain but your position that the discussion shouldn't be allowed because you don't agree with it is quite juvenile. Upon proper reflection you should realise that. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| 5 from the wing on debut wrote: | | think positive wrote: | | 5 from the wing on debut wrote: | | Tannin wrote: | | The thing that was not necessary was two or three people here getting shouty and hysterical about a perfectly decent and respectful discussion of a perfectly reasonable and indeed timely question. |
That's what I thought as well.
The premise of this topic was whether Pendles should step aside. That is, make the decision himself.
It's funny that the first person complaining about discussion of the captain being sacked was also the first person to even raise the issue of him being sacked. Understandable why the have another beer comment was made. |
Since you went back once to get that info go back and have another read, the sarcasm was an inch thick!
Just imagine Pendles ventures in to have a look and sees “should Pendles step aside?” I know insensitivity is a male trait, but getting not getting offended isn’t, and he does not deserve that. That’s why I , and I presume the others, want the thread shut down. It’s disrespectful and an insult to Pendles brave gutsy performance this year, under various forms of duress.
A couple of seasons ago I said he wasn’t a captains arsehole after one shitty defeat, and since then I have changed my tune and stated it clearly on here, many a time, that now I see what others saw all along. Yes he is a very different captain to Maxy, who I just loved. He has the integrity to stand aside when he knows he is done, of that I have no doubt.
But once again, the reason I’m offended is because it pisses me off the insensitive keyboard warriors have the audacity to start threads like this just days after we lost a grand final by 5 points and 90 $£$%^%%$ seconds, a grand final none of us could have dreamed we would be in.
And just to finish, if you feel the need to have a crack at me have the balls to name me. I don’t need the Dutch courage of alcohol to make my point.
Quite ironically, CHEERS! |
I have no idea what your name is. Tell me your name and I will name you. I just think of you as the bug person due to your avatar.
Why are you so offended? Don't you know how professional sporting clubs work? The position of every player is thoroughly reviewed at the end of every season. The issue that has been considered here will have also been considered by not only our club, but by our captain as well. I don't think he needs you to tell him whether he can do that or not.
For the record I think that he should remain captain but your position that the discussion shouldn't be allowed because you don't agree with it is quite juvenile. Upon proper reflection you should realise that. |
the name is TP,
im not telling Pendles to do anything, of course the club will review it, but you cant see that posting this a couple of days after the loss doesnt look like you might be appointing some blame?
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
5 from the wing on debut
Joined: 27 May 2016
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| think positive wrote: | | 5 from the wing on debut wrote: | | think positive wrote: | | 5 from the wing on debut wrote: | | Tannin wrote: | | The thing that was not necessary was two or three people here getting shouty and hysterical about a perfectly decent and respectful discussion of a perfectly reasonable and indeed timely question. |
That's what I thought as well.
The premise of this topic was whether Pendles should step aside. That is, make the decision himself.
It's funny that the first person complaining about discussion of the captain being sacked was also the first person to even raise the issue of him being sacked. Understandable why the have another beer comment was made. |
Since you went back once to get that info go back and have another read, the sarcasm was an inch thick!
Just imagine Pendles ventures in to have a look and sees “should Pendles step aside?” I know insensitivity is a male trait, but getting not getting offended isn’t, and he does not deserve that. That’s why I , and I presume the others, want the thread shut down. It’s disrespectful and an insult to Pendles brave gutsy performance this year, under various forms of duress.
A couple of seasons ago I said he wasn’t a captains arsehole after one shitty defeat, and since then I have changed my tune and stated it clearly on here, many a time, that now I see what others saw all along. Yes he is a very different captain to Maxy, who I just loved. He has the integrity to stand aside when he knows he is done, of that I have no doubt.
But once again, the reason I’m offended is because it pisses me off the insensitive keyboard warriors have the audacity to start threads like this just days after we lost a grand final by 5 points and 90 $£$%^%%$ seconds, a grand final none of us could have dreamed we would be in.
And just to finish, if you feel the need to have a crack at me have the balls to name me. I don’t need the Dutch courage of alcohol to make my point.
Quite ironically, CHEERS! |
I have no idea what your name is. Tell me your name and I will name you. I just think of you as the bug person due to your avatar.
Why are you so offended? Don't you know how professional sporting clubs work? The position of every player is thoroughly reviewed at the end of every season. The issue that has been considered here will have also been considered by not only our club, but by our captain as well. I don't think he needs you to tell him whether he can do that or not.
For the record I think that he should remain captain but your position that the discussion shouldn't be allowed because you don't agree with it is quite juvenile. Upon proper reflection you should realise that. |
the name is TP,
im not telling Pendles to do anything, of course the club will review it, but you cant see that posting this a couple of days after the loss doesnt look like you might be appointing some blame? |
Perhaps he was but I don't know that. Sheedy used to commence his reviews within 48 hours of a GF, win or lose. I still don't see an issue with posing the question. That's part of what this board is about. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
