Moore: if he is deemed fit & says he's fit does he play?

[Tannin]

^ So we'll put you down as a "maybe", shall we?

[uncanny]

Darcy is in our long term plans
but no for the pf
injuries have cruelled his season
if we win this week maybe a fairy tale cameo as a forward in a premiership if matchups and or an an injury permits it
hope he stays with us next year so we can see his potential unfold as an aa half back who can swing forward when needs be

[Cam]

If you re-watch the game, Mayne, Aish and Greenwood had key moments where they stood up, and a couple of each where they made questionable decisions. As did Pendlebury, Howe, Maynard, Cox, Varcoe, Adams, Sier, Goldsack, Grundy, Treloar, Hoskin-Elliott, Stephenson, Langdon, Thomas, Varcoe, Crisp, Mihocek, De Goey and Sidebottom.

I'm really, really torn.

Moore can be a game changer, particularly in the ruck in the limited time he's performed that role. Filling in against a numpty like Grigg or Nankervis, he could be a game winner whilst our main beast rests. Moore could be the first wing/ruckman. Buckley said he was 'best on track' last week, and is waiting for Darcy to put his hand up before assessing.

I also like the idea of Mayne locking down on someone. I really hope Sier can come up.

However I think this game will be won by us being daring. We won't limit Richmond the same as we did GWS, we will need to meet their pressure and raise with our superior talent. Because man for man we are a hell of a lot more talented than their united pack of spuds. We can do to them what Jewell & Co did to Hafey's Heroes. Because this time, we have the class.

If he's fit, he's in. Drive the Porsche and leave the Corolla in the garage.

[Pies4shaw]

[stui magpie]

[Culprit]

A massive call if they bring Moore in. The team is well balanced against the Tigers. Moore will upset that balance. My thoughts are about his commitment, if he hasn't signed by now how committed to the cause is he? He has the best Manager money can buy in chasing money for his client and I get the perception we are not offering nowhere near what the Swans are. In saying that, if we get through and Wet Toast win we would have to consider Reid or Moore. The positive is this is not a club distraction as in the Cloke saga of 2011.

I cannot see a change this week unless it's due to an injury.

[SwansWay]

[lanstro]

Only if someone else is injured and fails to come up. He hasn't played a full game for so long, and the only good game he has played all year was against the Eagles. Also he was hardly impressive against Reiwoldt last time around before he got injured.

Even without the injury issues, at this stage I see him as firmly a project player rather than an established product. You don't play project players just for fun in a prelim.

[qldmagpie67]

No to Moore or Reid this week there isn't match ups for them
If we win through then and plat West Coast then 1 would have to come in to play on Darling

[think positive]

[Piesnchess]

IF Sier is injured, cant play, Moore comes in, its a monty.

[Stinger]

^^THIS^^

[woodys_world69]

We lost our last 2 games against Richmond in the last quarter because we had injuries. Would be crazy to tempt fair again

[Ev5Magpies]

Bucks said in his press interview that Moore won't be playing this week

[Pies4shaw]

Yes, I heard that, too. Nathan certainly ruined a good thread with that presser.