Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Sidey firms from 100/1 in Brownlow markets.

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:00 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Donny wrote:
...
"The odds makers aren't stupid they go by history and I other factors when setting the prices"

As far as I know, weight of money (or lack of) determines the odds. It's not their (Crown, Bet 365 etc) opinion. They're not punters. Smile
...

Presumably the betting agencies have to set initial odds, though, before there is any weight of money... The weight of money then shifts it from the anchor point. How long any anchor effects last is the question.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
qldmagpie67 



Joined: 18 Dec 2008


PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:26 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

K wrote:
Donny wrote:
...
"The odds makers aren't stupid they go by history and I other factors when setting the prices"

As far as I know, weight of money (or lack of) determines the odds. It's not their (Crown, Bet 365 etc) opinion. They're not punters. Smile
...

Presumably the betting agencies have to set initial odds, though, before there is any weight of money... The weight of money then shifts it from the anchor point. How long any anchor effects last is the question.


Current there must be a starting market before anyone can place a bet
That is were the historical data and analysts come in
Sidey was always stupid odds in our eyes but in there's they want punters to take the 100/1 then they can shorten it
History stills says he can't win it but history is made to be rewritten
I hope for those who took the juicy odds he gets up and you've all had a scent lick at him
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Donny Aries

Formerly known as MAGFAN8.


Joined: 04 Aug 2002
Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:41 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Many did. Smile

For a player's odds to shorten from 100/1 to 40/1, means plenty got on.

_________________
Donny.

It's a game. Enjoy it. Very Happy
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Presti35 Virgo

Dick Lee for Legend Status


Joined: 05 Oct 2001
Location: London, England

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 6:55 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I feel that Pendles chance to win the medal has passed. Obvs there's still a lot of games to play, but I don't know if he'll be able to get enough 3's.

Which has me a little surprised that he is sort odds compared to Sidebottom and Grundy.

I guess its still only round 4.

_________________
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
Damien Aquarius

Me Noah & Flynn @ the G


Joined: 21 Jan 1999
Location: Croydon Vic

PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 11:21 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

qldmagpie67 wrote:
K wrote:
Donny wrote:
...
"The odds makers aren't stupid they go by history and I other factors when setting the prices"

As far as I know, weight of money (or lack of) determines the odds. It's not their (Crown, Bet 365 etc) opinion. They're not punters. Smile
...

Presumably the betting agencies have to set initial odds, though, before there is any weight of money... The weight of money then shifts it from the anchor point. How long any anchor effects last is the question.


Current there must be a starting market before anyone can place a bet
That is were the historical data and analysts come in
Sidey was always stupid odds in our eyes but in there's they want punters to take the 100/1 then they can shorten it
History stills says he can't win it but history is made to be rewritten
I hope for those who took the juicy odds he gets up and you've all had a scent lick at him


Why does history say he can’t win it? He’s a mid?

_________________
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Donny Aries

Formerly known as MAGFAN8.


Joined: 04 Aug 2002
Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia

PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:00 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Martin's firmed, after his 6 goal game, last week. He's now a touch under 3/1.

Mitchell's 7/2.

Dangerfield & Fyfe are next, @ 7 and 8/1.

After tumbling in from the 100/1 to 40s, punters kept wagerring on Sidey. He's now paying $34 on Crown.

_________________
Donny.

It's a game. Enjoy it. Very Happy
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:03 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

What was it like before tumbling in from the 1001 to 40s punters kept wagerring on Sidey ?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
dalyc Scorpio



Joined: 02 Mar 2005


PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:16 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Donny wrote:
Many did. Smile

For a player's odds to shorten from 100/1 to 40/1, means plenty got on.


Not necessarily. Money moves markets but so does information. Bookies weren’t blind and deaf and they aren’t a charity. They saw Sidey’s form and that would have contributed to the move in price just as much as bets taken.

_________________
Four legged animals good, two legged animals better
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Donny Aries

Formerly known as MAGFAN8.


Joined: 04 Aug 2002
Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia

PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:30 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that's incorrect but I'll research. Smile
_________________
Donny.

It's a game. Enjoy it. Very Happy
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:32 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm glad you got a laugh out of it.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
dalyc Scorpio



Joined: 02 Mar 2005


PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 8:43 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Donny wrote:
I think that's incorrect but I'll research. Smile


I’ll bet ya

_________________
Four legged animals good, two legged animals better
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Donny Aries

Formerly known as MAGFAN8.


Joined: 04 Aug 2002
Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia

PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 10:30 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I emailed Crown.

Reply:

"odds within a market will fluctuate based on the number of bets being placed and on which selections"

Yep. Not blind and deaf. Also, not punters. Smile

_________________
Donny.

It's a game. Enjoy it. Very Happy
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Piesnchess 

piesnchess


Joined: 09 Jun 2008


PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 1:04 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Jesus, or rather, Grundy, WILL win the Brownlow, lock it in !!!!!!
_________________
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Skids Cancer

Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.


Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175

PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:02 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

dalyc wrote:
Donny wrote:
Many did. Smile

For a player's odds to shorten from 100/1 to 40/1, means plenty got on.


Not necessarily. Money moves markets but so does information. Bookies weren’t blind and deaf and they aren’t a charity. They saw Sidey’s form and that would have contributed to the move in price just as much as bets taken.


The Only thing that moves markets is money. If bookies went with their heart (as you're suggesting) they'd be gambling and they don't do that.
Their markets are framed so they can't lose.

_________________
Don't count the days, make the days count.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
dalyc Scorpio



Joined: 02 Mar 2005


PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 2:02 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok so consider this. In October, a Horse is 50-1 to win the Melbourne Cup. He then wins the Caulfield Cup running away by 4 lengths. I can guarantee you the a minute after the race the horse would be 10-1 or shorter for Melbourne Cup without a bet being taken. How do I know this? Because I’ve worked in the gambling industry for 20 years.

Yes, money moves markets but so does information.

It’s why bookies employ various people to gather information and use this info to gain an edge.

_________________
Four legged animals good, two legged animals better
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group