Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Photograph of topless woman sent to 3AW

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 11:22 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

With a quick search around various forums, it isn't too hard to identify the relevant player.
_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
ronrat 



Joined: 22 May 2006
Location: Thailand

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2017 2:07 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes Jezza but whose tits where they
_________________
Annoying opposition supporters since 1967.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2017 6:24 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Jezza wrote:
With a quick search around various forums, it isn't too hard to identify the relevant player.


Even this one. Wink

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:28 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/richmond-name-nathan-broad-as-player-at-centre-of-photo-scandal-20171029-gzaou0.html

Watch it live at 11:00am, the AFL website breathlessly tells us Shocked
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:45 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Broad suspended for three matches. Media outlets still using the photo (albeit censored to varying degrees) in their reportage. Kind of ironic?

http://m.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-30/tiger-to-front-media-over-topless-photo-scandal

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 12:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Who is Nathan Broad?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:42 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies4shaw wrote:
Who is Nathan Broad?


Laughing

Careful, while Tannin's signature is "Commas can kill" apostrophes can make all the difference & unintentionally invite sexist claims.

Who is Nathan's Broad?

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:53 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

3 weeks suspension is really piss weak. Should have been 12 months.

Had this type of behaviour be deemed "revenge porn" Broad could have been jailed for up to two years.

I like his seemingly remorseful behaviour but 3 weeks seems really far too little a consequence for Broad's irresponsible and destructive behaviour.

The more this type of behaviour is outed the better.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:15 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^ Really? Its wrong and I agree that it needs to be cracked down upon; but, as mentioned above, this is pretty mild as 'revenge porn' goes a) the victim could not have been identified, which is a pretty major aspect of the harm committed in such cases; b) it was not an explicitly sexual or sexualised photograph, which again makes it much less harmful than the 'revenge porn' most of us would be familiar with; and c) the victim elected not to pursue charges. So, no, I don't think there's any way a jail term could have been applied here, and a 12-month suspension for an 'off-field' incident would have been an outrageously draconian finding, particularly given the much shorter suspensions players have faced for physical assaults and the like. (On that note, I wonder if there's something a bit old-fashioned about some of the responses to this act like, a woman having her 'honour' besmirched by having a partially naked photo of herself circulated is seen as somehow tantamount to, or worse than, a man being punched in the face. And we know from experience that men who are victims of this kind of 'revenge porn' aren't treated with nearly as much sympathy.)

Ultimately, the player has been publicly named, been forced to endure a humiliating press conference and is going to miss the start of the next season. That seems a sufficient punishment for the crime (inasmuch as the AFL should be doling out punishments for off-field behaviour at all, but you all know how I feel about that).

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:37 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
^ Really? Its wrong and I agree that it needs to be cracked down upon; but, as mentioned above, this is pretty mild as 'revenge porn' goes a) the victim could not have been identified, which is a pretty major aspect of the harm committed in such cases; b) it was not an explicitly sexual or sexualised photograph, which again makes it much less harmful than the 'revenge porn' most of us would be familiar with; and c) the victim elected not to pursue charges. So, no, I don't think there's any way a jail term could have been applied here, and a 12-month suspension for an 'off-field' incident would have been an outrageously draconian finding, particularly given the much shorter suspensions players have faced for physical assaults and the like. (On that note, I wonder if there's something a bit old-fashioned about some of the responses to this act like, a woman having her 'honour' besmirched by having a partially naked photo of herself circulated is seen as somehow tantamount to, or worse than, a man being punched in the face. And we know from experience that men who are victims of this kind of 'revenge porn' aren't treated with nearly as much sympathy.)

Ultimately, the player has been publicly named, been forced to endure a humiliating press conference and is going to miss the start of the next season. That seems a sufficient punishment for the crime (inasmuch as the AFL should be doling out punishments for off-field behaviour at all, but you all know how I feel about that).


I was under the impression:

That if the victim went ahead with legal action she then get's named.
By not pursuing legal action she doen't get named

Punish it hard now & set this up as learning expreience for the future.

3 games is nowhere near enough to act as a deterrent.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:44 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

On the contrary, I think a lot of players will be thinking twice about doing this kind of thing after today and given the comparative mildness of the offence, the club and AFL's response sends a pretty strong message. I don't think many players would want to be in Nathan Broad's shoes right now.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:15 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
On the contrary, I think a lot of players will be thinking twice about doing this kind of thing after today and given the comparative mildness of the offence, the club and AFL's response sends a pretty strong message. I don't think many players would want to be in Nathan Broad's shoes right now.


3 weeks is hardly a disincentive. Broad should feel highly embarrassed by his serious wrongdoing here.

Reinforce "players thinking twice" about it by sending a stronger message - by applying a consequence on the field than a mere and paltry 3 weeks.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
luvdids Sagittarius



Joined: 22 Mar 2008
Location: work

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:42 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
On the contrary, I think a lot of players will be thinking twice about doing this kind of thing after today and given the comparative mildness of the offence, the club and AFL's response sends a pretty strong message. I don't think many players would want to be in Nathan Broad's shoes right now.


Really? Although it wasn't too graphic (ie: no genitals) and wasn't a picture showing her identity, surely the fact that he thought it was ok is more the issue? Not what's in it, not if you can see her face, just the simple fact he thought it was a good idea. IMHO that's more than "mild", that's what the main problem is for me. Glad to see he looked genuinely remorseful.

(and interesting to note he knew her before the GF, she wasn't some 'let's find a GF winning footballer as some here have claimed")
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:59 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

What he did was ethically wrong and against the law, and I think all have acknowledged that. What I mean by mild is that it was on the low (perhaps, indeed, the very lowest) end of this type of offending.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 6:27 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
^ Really? Its wrong and I agree that it needs to be cracked down upon; but, as mentioned above, this is pretty mild as 'revenge porn' goes a) the victim could not have been identified, which is a pretty major aspect of the harm committed in such cases; b) it was not an explicitly sexual or sexualised photograph, which again makes it much less harmful than the 'revenge porn' most of us would be familiar with; and c) the victim elected not to pursue charges. So, no, I don't think there's any way a jail term could have been applied here, and a 12-month suspension for an 'off-field' incident would have been an outrageously draconian finding, particularly given the much shorter suspensions players have faced for physical assaults and the like. (On that note, I wonder if there's something a bit old-fashioned about some of the responses to this act like, a woman having her 'honour' besmirched by having a partially naked photo of herself circulated is seen as somehow tantamount to, or worse than, a man being punched in the face. And we know from experience that men who are victims of this kind of 'revenge porn' aren't treated with nearly as much sympathy.)

Ultimately, the player has been publicly named, been forced to endure a humiliating press conference and is going to miss the start of the next season. That seems a sufficient punishment for the crime (inasmuch as the AFL should be doling out punishments for off-field behaviour at all, but you all know how I feel about that).


Like AFL footballers who send nude picks to trolls pretending to be women? Reiwoldt and the St Kilda Schoolgirl photos?

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 6 of 7   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group