 |
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
David 
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda
|
| Post subject: State violence in Catalonia |  |
|
A vote for independence in the Spanish region of Catalonia has been met with police brutality.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/01/the-guardian-view-on-catalonias-referendum-the-spanish-state-has-lost
| Quote: | Spain is in crisis, and its prime minister appears to be in denial. The run-up to Sunday’s referendum on independence for Catalonia made it clear that the country was in trouble. But neither those arranging it nor those rejecting it can fully have anticipated the scenes at polling stations: police in riot gear beating peaceful protesters with batons, dragging voters out by the hair or throwing them down stairs, firing rubber bullets to disperse crowds – even striking at Catalan firefighters and jostling with Catalan police.
The immediate result of the violence was hundreds of casualties by mid-afternoon, according to Catalan authorities, and at least 11 wounded officers, according to the central government. The wider effect is the shock expressed well beyond Catalonia, and Spain. The outcome is almost certain to be that some of the Catalans indifferent or opposed to secession – until now, at least, the majority – are pushed into the arms of the cause. Who wants to be ruled by a state like this, many are asking. |
The Spanish government has a pretty strange way of trying to convince the Catalan people to stay under their control. Why not just let the referendum be held and ignore the results, as they were always going to do anyway? Why not permit some greater autonomy in the region and placate the movement? As it is, their response is bewildering and disgusting and will only lend more support to the independence cause.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Last edited by David on Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:56 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
 |
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Oops. Too much data. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Yeah I read the article, absolute madness, no wonder they don’t want to be part of that government, way to prove a point!
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
sixpoints
Joined: 27 Sep 2010
Location: Lulie Street
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Since this is a footy site, I thought I'd add the football perspective to what's currently happening in Catalunya.
Everyone would know that FC Barcelona (Barca) is one of the biggest & most successful soccer teams on Earth. They very much represent a point of difference with the rest of Spain for their Catalunyan support. Games especially against Real Madrid are Castille v Catalunya.
Barca felt there was a conspiracy from the Madrid based La Liga. They had scheduled a home match for Barca on the day of the Independence Referendum. Barca pleaded with the league to change the date citing the unrest could spill into the stadium. A Barca supporter group warned the league they would try a pitch invasion to promote Catalunya Independence.
The league wouldn't budge and told Barca to play or be fined massively and be deducted 6 points. Naturally the Barca fans were furious and responded in kind with vitriol for the Madrid based league.
The usual 90,000 turned up for the game. The Barca players came out in the uniform of Catalunya for their warm up before the gates were opened. Then it was discovered their opponents Las Palmas from the Canary Islands were given permission by the league to sew a small Spanish flag onto their uniform.
Barca asked the league again for a postponement but were told no, so they decided with 30 minutes to go that the game will go ahead, but that the crowd would not be allowed in, as the volatility of 90,000 would be impossible to manage.
So Barca played Las Palmas in a stadium of 90,00 in front of a crowd of 0. Lionel Messi got 2 and Barca won 3-0.
Don't discount the effect of the intransigence by the league in further empassioning the Catalunyans. Soccer is life there and the shambles made of this match is being used extensively as propaganda. |
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I don't know how widespread the police brutality was. The media does not do context well, and facts without context are often misleading.
I have some sympathy with the Spanish authorities. Britain held a referendum on Scottish independence a few years ago, via an agreed, managed democratic process. The central government and the Scots Nats negotiated and agreed the terms, and the result was respected by all. I'm not a Scottish nationalist, but credit to their party for its proper democratic conduct.
This appears to be a unilateral act of sedition orchestrated by a provincial government which returned over 90% in favour of secession - the kind of figures which suggest illegitimacy in any fair electoral process. If a referendum is conducted illegally under the terms of the Spanish constitution, the government has the responsibility of enforcing the law. When nationalist passions are running high, some acts of brutality toward the police, and from the police, are probably inevitable. I'd suggest the Catalan nationalists bear a very substantial part of the blame.
Spain may ultimately have to face up to its Scottish problem via a well-managed referendum, and I can understand the Catalan nationalists' frustration and provocations, but the way to achieve it is through patience, engagement and diplomacy rather than schismatic convulsion.
_________________
Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda
|
| Post subject: | |
|
What would it take for that to happen? Spain seems to have no intention of letting Catalonia go and at present isn't even prepared to throw it a bone with more autonomy. You use the UK and Scotland as an example of how to achieve independence, but ultimately that is an extremely unusual case of a benign state allowing one of its regions to decide its own future. The global reality is very different.
You can question the media narrative, but the police weren't responding to a riot or violent behaviour; they were tasked with disrupting a peaceful electoral process (an 'illegal' one, though I trust we all know how arbitrary such things are in the context of sovereignty) and seizing ballot boxes, and the riot gear suggests that they weren't waiting around for people to get out of their way. 400-odd civilians injured vs 12 police are the figures I've read. Sometimes, if it looks and smells like police brutality, it's police brutality.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Last edited by David on Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:51 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Say no to the UK and Scotland as an example of how to achieve independence but that is an unusual case of a benign state allowing one of its regions to decide its own future. |
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| David wrote: | What would it take for that to happen? Spain seems to have no intention of letting Catalonia go and at present isn't even prepared to throw it a bone with more autonomy. You use the UK and Scotland as an example of how to achieve independence, but ultimately that is an extremely unusual case of a benign state allowing one of its regions to decide its own future. The global reality is very different.
You can question the media narrative, but the police weren't responding to a riot or violent behaviour; they were tasked with disrupting a peaceful electoral process (an 'illegal' one, though I trust we all know how arbitrary such things are in the context of sovereignty) and seizing ballot boxes, and the riot gear suggests that they weren't waiting around for people to get out of their way. 400-odd civilians injured vs 12 police are the figures I've read. Sometimes, if it looks and smells like police brutality, it's police brutality. |
1. Constitutional legality is not "arbitrary". That's why we have constitutions.
2. The police have riot gear. The fact that 12 were injured despite that tells you there was plenty of two-way commerce, which one would expect. I'd also like to see the definitions and corroborating evidence for injury, given politically-motivated parties are involved. It may be police brutality - or it may be law enforcement under heat and pressure.
3. I don't know what it would take - presumably lots of discussion and a large majority vote for a party that wants it as a core part of its manifesto. But unilateral secession in this way seems pretty student-politicky to me. And there are few countries where such an action would be permitted with indifference by the sovereign authority.
_________________
Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw 
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| David wrote: | What would it take for that to happen? Spain seems to have no intention of letting Catalonia go and at present isn't even prepared to throw it a bone with more autonomy. You use the UK and Scotland as an example of how to achieve independence, but ultimately that is an extremely unusual case of a benign state allowing one of its regions to decide its own future. The global reality is very different.
You can question the media narrative, but the police weren't responding to a riot or violent behaviour; they were tasked with disrupting a peaceful electoral process (an 'illegal' one, though I trust we all know how arbitrary such things are in the context of sovereignty) and seizing ballot boxes, and the riot gear suggests that they weren't waiting around for people to get out of their way. 400-odd civilians injured vs 12 police are the figures I've read. Sometimes, if it looks and smells like police brutality, it's police brutality. |
Of course it was police brutality. There was no need for a police presence, save as a show of State power. This wasn't a demonstration in Madrid. If they hadn't been present, there'd have been no injuries - or do we think the Catalans were going to start beating each other up in all the excitement? |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Mugwump wrote: | 1. Constitutional legality is not "arbitrary". That's why we have constitutions.
2. The police have riot gear. The fact that 12 were injured despite that tells you there was plenty of two-way commerce, which one would expect. I'd also like to see the definitions and corroborating evidence for injury, given politically-motivated parties are involved. It may be police brutality - or it may be law enforcement under heat and pressure.
3. I don't know what it would take - presumably lots of discussion and a large majority vote for a party that wants it as a core part of its manifesto. But unilateral secession in this way seems pretty student-politicky to me. And there are few countries where such an action would be permitted with indifference by the sovereign authority. |
1. It's arbitrary in the sense that it is a reflection of the will of the ruling state, which is quite often indifferent or actively hostile to the aims of the minority ethnocultural group. The only real arbiter beyond that is international law/recognition, which is so often about the interests of the powerful – hence why Taiwan, an independent state for all apparent purposes, is treated like a non-entity by the UN and so many of its member states. What hope do the Catalan people have of attaining 'legitimacy' in such a dynamic?
2. Law enforcement 'under heat and pressure' is very much capable of overstepping the boundaries – and ultimately, they are the ones with the batons and rubber bullets.
3. Precisely. 90% of the world's nations, if not more, would meet a secession vote with similar (if not much worse) violence – we saw something of that kind in Cameroon on the weekend too. That's not an indication that such a response is ethical or appropriate, it's an indication of the near-ubiquitous violence of the state towards those who would challenge its authority.
Ultimately, the right response was either to a) recognise the Catalan people's desires for self-government by granting them a free vote or coming to a compromise; or, at worst, b) refuse to accept the referendum's legitimacy and just keep on ignoring the will of the region. Neither of those responses required riot police. As it is, this show of force will almost certainly aid the Catalan independence cause and harm the perceived legitimacy of the Spanish state.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
^ Having expressed an admiration for the way the Scottish referendum was handled, I wish the Spanish authorities had pursued that route. But given they did not, and given that the Catalan nationalists then chose to defy the constitution, I support any sovereign government within a broadly democratic society upholding its laws. Ignoring the outcome is certainly a tactic, but a doubtful one, as the secessionists will simply move on to their next provocation, having poked their finger into the woodwork and found mush.
Anarchy like this prompts violence, and one should rise above knee-jerk media narratives and question where and how violence takes place, from whom, toward whom, in what sequence. It's likely that "team red" and "team blue" thinking is good news, but poor analysis.
Spain is a modern EU country with a democratic system and the Catalunya region is already given very substantial autonomy. Its main beef seems to be that it is richer than the rest of Spain and wants to cease subsidising it (to be fair, given Spain's tendency to corruption, so would I). They are not a poor, brutalised or discriminated-against minority. So, starting from here, they should negotiate with the Spanish government and use their leverage as a bloc within the national parliament to operate via the constituted democratic process. In the absence of rank injustice, patience and forbearance and working with goodwill are underrated human qualities, but there are many good people who have them. They contribute far more to the good of the world than pocket Lenins who want a bigger job than provincial government.
_________________
Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Mugwump wrote: | | I support any sovereign government within a broadly democratic society upholding its laws |
Would you add a 'by any means' to the end of that sentence? And if not, where do you draw the line? (Personally, I would have thought beating unarmed protesters might be around abouts.)
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
^ no, of course not "by any means". And judging from the footage, there were very probably some instances of rank police brutality, which should be dealt with as a disciplinary or legal matter. But the footage also shows a very agitated situation on all sides, and it seems to be taken on the mobile phones of those who were not disinterested. With 12 officers "injured" while wearing riot gear, it's likely that there was violence flowing both ways. I just think we should try to be a bit more sceptical about news grabs, delve a bit below appearances, and consider issues of principle.
_________________
Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Here is some of that footage, by the way (not sure if it's the same video you saw):
https://youtube.com/watch?v=GI49YSCruwY
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I saw the fist clip, not the later ones. In the first, I see one cop behaving badly (kicking and grabbing hair). The majority I see trying to use reasonable force to disperse an unlawful assembly. We do not know what events preceded this. In later clips we see police striking out with batons as they try to control an unruly crowd much larger than they. The injury on the man's back looks real, but pretty minor. Again, 12 police were injured despite being dressed like stormtroopers. Maybe there was a bit more to it than meets the lens.
As usual, I think, I am prepared to see potential fault on both sides and clearly some actions by the police in that footage warrant investigation - but all you seem to see, and imagine, is police brutality. I think your critical faculties, usually fairly acute, may be hijacked by ideology.
_________________
Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
