Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Lack of team defence

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BBHS Cancer

bbhs


Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Location: Bellarine

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 10:14 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Effort was not the issue on Friday night. Shows what that wanker King knows about football.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stoliboy Cancer



Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Location: Sydney, NSW

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:20 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The video from last night's "On the Couch" is up. David King's analysis of Collingwood's defense starts at 38:25... click here: https://youtu.be/k1fOYrCjRik?t=2306

Calls out the following players for being lazy/jogging in defense and not putting pressure with the zone:
- Alex Fasolo
- Adam Treleor
- Scott Pendlebury
- Taylor Adams
- Brayden Maynard

Said what a few people have been saying on Nicks that we are not putting enough pressure on when we lose the ball and at times is too easy for the other team to get an easy scoring shot.

_________________
Sydney Collingwood Supporters Club
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
Mugwump 



Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:42 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^ it was the best analysis I've seen of the problem, and Fasolo didn't come out of it looking good. But it was also obvious that the last few defenders - Howe and Goldsack - were just too high, as were the mids who seemed deeper than theirs.
_________________
Two more flags before I die!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
3rd degree Aries



Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: John Wren's tote

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 1:01 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Mugwump wrote:
^ it was the best analysis I've seen of the problem, and Fasolo didn't come out of it looking good. But it was also obvious that the last few defenders - Howe and Goldsack - were just too high, as were the mids who seemed deeper than theirs.



i agree the high press fails for both our forward and back line. When I see Cox and Moore pressing up to the wing it does not help us score goals.

_________________
" Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".

www.facebook/the hybernators
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
MarkOSuv 



Joined: 22 Mar 2017


PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 1:11 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The defensive zone has been leaking goals for a full year. Ultimately it is up to one person to fix it and he hasn't.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MatthewBoydFanClub 



Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Location: Elwood

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:01 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

MarkOSuv wrote:
The defensive zone has been leaking goals for a full year. Ultimately it is up to one person to fix it and he hasn't.

Are you aware that we have 5 assistant coaches and Walshy, who's the head of the football department, who have to sign off on the strategic game plan of the team. It's not just the senior coach who wakes up one morning and thinks, oh well I think I'll try this new defensive zone for the next 12 months and if it leaks goals and doesn't work, I keep doing it until it does work, or they fire me. Do you honestly think the senior coach works in a vacuum and doesn't listen to his coaching staff and doesn't pay attention to what the other 17 teams in the competition are doing? If you go to any of the match sims at training you can hear the assistant coaches yelling at players to move into their defensive zone positions. I don't hear them looking up at Buckley to get his permission before they talk to players. If Buckley left tomorrow, whoever takes over would use similar match day strategies as Buckley - they might employ modifications to the game plan and favour some different match day ploys - other than that it would be steady as you go under a new coach and not much different to the present.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
qldmagpie67 



Joined: 18 Dec 2008


PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:35 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The zone is a part of the game all teams employ were not alone doing it.
Some vary it some stick to a set pattern.
Half way through last season we adjusted ours to be more zone to players than zone to space.
The Bulldogs play a very weird structure which is hard to man up on.
They play a 3 or 4 man forward line and 2 or 3 more players sitting goal side of contests looking for quick release handballs from team mates.
What that overview showed was our backs pushed up high and we held goldie and Howe back but they can't cover the running players as well as there own men.
Our mids need to work better defensively to assist halting or slowing these fast breaks.
Agree that we need work on it and I personally would prefer us to play man on man.
Also last night they showed Melbourne set up with a 8 or 9 man defence with 2 or 3 players coming off the back of the square to either halt forward momentum of the opposition or run in support of there own players. StKilda got caught out badly with over the top gaols as well
Were not the only side who had this happen to them on the weekend.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
inxs88 



Joined: 17 Aug 2014


PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:07 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

qldmagpie67 wrote:
The zone is a part of the game all teams employ were not alone doing it.
Some vary it some stick to a set pattern.
Half way through last season we adjusted ours to be more zone to players than zone to space.
The Bulldogs play a very weird structure which is hard to man up on.
They play a 3 or 4 man forward line and 2 or 3 more players sitting goal side of contests looking for quick release handballs from team mates.
What that overview showed was our backs pushed up high and we held goldie and Howe back but they can't cover the running players as well as there own men.
Our mids need to work better defensively to assist halting or slowing these fast breaks.
Agree that we need work on it and I personally would prefer us to play man on man.
Also last night they showed Melbourne set up with a 8 or 9 man defence with 2 or 3 players coming off the back of the square to either halt forward momentum of the opposition or run in support of there own players. StKilda got caught out badly with over the top gaols as well
Were not the only side who had this happen to them on the weekend.



One of my BUCKET list goals in life is to see the Pies score a goal with 3 unopposed Pies players sauntering into goal having broken the zone! Just once Nathan, just once!

_________________
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
jackcass Cancer



Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:21 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

BBHS wrote:
Effort was not the issue on Friday night. Shows what that wanker King knows about football.


A few players are not as quick running defensively as they are offensively, 1-2 prone to a lot of almost stationary defensively.

People used to knock Brown and Tooves but they always gave 100% in their defensive running. The Sack, Crisp, Varcoe, Ramsay, Sinclair probably the best of those on our list this year.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
magpieazza 

magpieazza


Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Location: Griffith N.S.W

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:26 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder how fit we are in comparison to other teams.

Of all the stats I would like to see how our time trials stack up against all the other teams in the comp.

Im not saying we are slack but if its not a running "thing" then it could point to a skill "thing" or an execution of plan "thing".

You would think it would be an indicator worth exploring.

_________________
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
jackcass Cancer



Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:26 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

inxs88 wrote:
qldmagpie67 wrote:
The zone is a part of the game all teams employ were not alone doing it.
Some vary it some stick to a set pattern.
Half way through last season we adjusted ours to be more zone to players than zone to space.
The Bulldogs play a very weird structure which is hard to man up on.
They play a 3 or 4 man forward line and 2 or 3 more players sitting goal side of contests looking for quick release handballs from team mates.
What that overview showed was our backs pushed up high and we held goldie and Howe back but they can't cover the running players as well as there own men.
Our mids need to work better defensively to assist halting or slowing these fast breaks.
Agree that we need work on it and I personally would prefer us to play man on man.
Also last night they showed Melbourne set up with a 8 or 9 man defence with 2 or 3 players coming off the back of the square to either halt forward momentum of the opposition or run in support of there own players. StKilda got caught out badly with over the top gaols as well
Were not the only side who had this happen to them on the weekend.



One of my BUCKET list goals in life is to see the Pies score a goal with 3 unopposed Pies players sauntering into goal having broken the zone! Just once Nathan, just once!


Like it never happens. Maybe spend more time actually watching games.


Last edited by jackcass on Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:51 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
jackcass Cancer



Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:27 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

magpieazza wrote:
I wonder how fit we are in comparison to other teams.

Of all the stats I would like to see how our time trials stack up against all the other teams in the comp.

Im not saying we are slack but if its not a running "thing" then it could point to a skill "thing" or an execution of plan "thing".

You would think it would be an indicator worth exploring.


I'd say it's more an application and chemistry thing than a fitness issue.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Lazza 



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:30 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Plus new players take time to gel into a team, game plan, tactics, moves etc.

We repeat this shit at the start of every bloody season.. Rolling Eyes

Still some need to be told each year.............. Shocked

Lets assess the team after about 6 rounds at the earliest. Idea

_________________
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
magpieazza 

magpieazza


Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Location: Griffith N.S.W

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:03 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

jackcass wrote:
magpieazza wrote:
I wonder how fit we are in comparison to other teams.

Of all the stats I would like to see how our time trials stack up against all the other teams in the comp.

Im not saying we are slack but if its not a running "thing" then it could point to a skill "thing" or an execution of plan "thing".

You would think it would be an indicator worth exploring.


I'd say it's more an application and chemistry thing than a fitness issue.


If what you are saying is true ( although I understand its your opinion and im not sure how informed it is ) then this forum can have something to constructively talk about.

I get frustrated when the same questions get asked but not the right ones.

_________________
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MarkOSuv 



Joined: 22 Mar 2017


PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:04 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

If it isn't fixed, the coach is doomed.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group