Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Pre-Match: Pies v. Tigers - All comments please.

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 15, 16, 17  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 5:58 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

stui magpie wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:
I think we should stick with the 'no dickheads' policy.


As long as it doesn't extend to members. Razz Embarassed


You dickhead. Laughing Laughing Laughing
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
jackcass Cancer



Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 5:58 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

derkd wrote:
Pies4shaw wrote:
Can he play footy? We're short on those types.



The media pump him up. he is solid. we have enough Mids...we need to focus on forwards and backs.


Agree, if we're going to look at another top line mid through FA, throw everything at Fyfe, otherwise focus on KPP types if there are any on offer.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Tezza23 



Joined: 16 Mar 2014


PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:17 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

There is no doubt that Fyffe is a better person and a gun midfielder, but Martin can play as a forward and in that role is a more versatile player. He knows where the goals are and is virtually "untackleable" (if you know what I mean) but my question is can we afford him ? After all didn't we shell out about a million a year for Mayne and Wells so we can't have too much salary cap room.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Piesnchess 

piesnchess


Joined: 09 Jun 2008


PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:22 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:
swoop42 wrote:
Our best chance of persuading Martin might be to employ his good mate Swan in some role at the club next season.

Pity Swannie didn't have a couple of years still left in him.



I'm honestly fairly confident he'll choose us Swoop, just get that feeling and Eddie is no fool when it comes too business and I'm sure he's been planning for this for a bit - he'll be in his ear whispering him sweet nothings and selling the Pies to him 'cha-ching'


inclined to agree, dusty wont commit to tiges for a definite reason, theres no doubt a team is into him bigtime, just hope its us, he would be very, very handy to say the very least. Cool

_________________
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Tezza23 wrote:
There is no doubt that Fyffe is a better person and a gun midfielder, but Martin can play as a forward and in that role is a more versatile player. He knows where the goals are and is virtually "untackleable" (if you know what I mean) but my question is can we afford him ? After all didn't we shell out about a million a year for Mayne and Wells so we can't have too much salary cap room.


I've heard very strong rumors suggesting that Fyffe is the most disliked player at the dockers......and the only player NOT invited to a couple of recent player weddings. If it's true, then neither the Dockers or Tigers will win a Premiership. We need leaders who inspire their teammates, not piss them off.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
3rd degree Aries



Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: John Wren's tote

PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:36 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

RudeBoy wrote:
Tezza23 wrote:
There is no doubt that Fyffe is a better person and a gun midfielder, but Martin can play as a forward and in that role is a more versatile player. He knows where the goals are and is virtually "untackleable" (if you know what I mean) but my question is can we afford him ? After all didn't we shell out about a million a year for Mayne and Wells so we can't have too much salary cap room.


I've heard very strong rumors suggesting that Fyffe is the most disliked player at the dockers......and the only player NOT invited to a couple of recent player weddings. If it's true, then neither the Dockers or Tigers will win a Premiership. We need leaders who inspire their teammates, not piss them off.



Which is disapointing that Gault retired so young.

_________________
" Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".

www.facebook/the hybernators
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
qldmagpie67 



Joined: 18 Dec 2008


PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:44 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Forget Fyfe if doesnt stay at dockers he will be a hawk lock it in. I tipped you guys O'Meara 3yrs ago to Hawks. Fyfe wants million plus a year and dockers don't want to commit that much. Hawks started end of last season clearing the cap space Hodge goes this year with Bugoyne and they land Fyfe.
Tigers won't have the cap space for Martin simple. Rance is in near a million Prestia near $800k there still paying Delido $250k for this and next season. Martin likely to be at saints or north.
We won't be a player for him
Our war chest is going to be thrown at a power forward to assist Moore. The likes of Cameron or Paton or Schache will be in our sights.
Schache is most likely hasnt settled well into Brisbane life and is keen to move home. Don't know if we could work a trade though would be tough.
We have mids to burn but lack forward fire power.
As for this weeks match Aish will come in for sure. Varcoe will miss 1 week but wouldn't discount Broomy getting a run as well. Think we were 1 tall to heavy last week and think the same this week.
Cox looks the most likely to miss as he offers the least around the ground and mobility wise. Goldie can play both ends, White can ruck enough and offers more athletism. WHE can play mor forward and is very mobile and takes a good grab.
If Elliott is fit then he's automatic and means Blair misses
Really only poor kicking cost us last week fix that and we should win.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Number 35 



Joined: 17 Apr 2016


PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:12 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I think we should put Moore behind the ball.
Rance will most likely beat him. So why not suprise them and put Big Cox on Rance, and let Fasolo Elliot and co. take the load.

I would like to see Howe Reid and Moore at Half Back.

_________________
Gavin Brown.. Collingwood lifting..Right on the boundary line, back to Milane likewise... DAICOS nearly runs out of room........ GOAL
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Banned 
Piesnchess 

piesnchess


Joined: 09 Jun 2008


PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:17 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeh, blair must go, on reflection, and as suggested on the other thread, time to give Kirby a go, even only half fit, hed be an improvement on blair, who tries hard but does bugger all with the ball. Sorry TP, but even my patience has run out with your fave player, he just isn't cutting it, must have a spell in the magoos. Its time.
_________________
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
mooretreloar 



Joined: 21 Sep 2016


PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

If we bring the effort that we brought against the Dogs on Thursday night, the result against inferior opposition will look after itself. We should win this game comfortably and if we don't it is going to be a very long year, but I can't see that happening unless we butcher the ball worse than last Friday night or we don't bring the same effort and intensity.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
kymbo5@yahoo.com.au 



Joined: 23 Mar 2014


PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:01 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

From what I gathered from Buck's presser on Fri night Elliott won't play this week. Varcoe won't either unless he escapes with a reprimand.
Means at least 2 ins. Presume like for like but there will be consideration to match up on the Tigers. I wouldn't mind Wills in to tag Martin but his fitness is questionable too.
Interesting selection ahead.

As for the chatter re Martin coming to Collingwood next year - no thanks. I'm in the "no dickheads" opinion camp.

_________________
kymbo
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Mugwump 



Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne

PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:05 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

mooretreloar wrote:
If we bring the effort that we brought against the Dogs on Thursday night, the result against inferior opposition will look after itself. We should win this game comfortably and if we don't it is going to be a very long year, but I can't see that happening unless we butcher the ball worse than last Friday night or we don't bring the same effort and intensity.


I agree. Someone said elsewhere that they expect the tigers to get decapitated on Thursday night, and if we bring that game I think that's a likely outcome.

_________________
Two more flags before I die!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Damien Aquarius

Me Noah & Flynn @ the G


Joined: 21 Jan 1999
Location: Croydon Vic

PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:17 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

There are two schools of thought. No dickheads vs players aren't robots and it takes all sorts to make a footy team.

Bucks is criticised for wanting everyone to be a cleanskin and be as dedicated and clean living as he was.

Do you want a footballer as talented as Martin or not. I do. Have no doubt Bucks would too.

_________________
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:20 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

RudeBoy wrote:
stui magpie wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:
I think we should stick with the 'no dickheads' policy.


As long as it doesn't extend to members. Razz Embarassed


You dickhead. Laughing Laughing Laughing


I resemble that remark. Embarassed

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:26 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

RudeBoy wrote:
Tezza23 wrote:
There is no doubt that Fyffe is a better person and a gun midfielder, but Martin can play as a forward and in that role is a more versatile player. He knows where the goals are and is virtually "untackleable" (if you know what I mean) but my question is can we afford him ? After all didn't we shell out about a million a year for Mayne and Wells so we can't have too much salary cap room.


I've heard very strong rumors suggesting that Fyffe is the most disliked player at the dockers......and the only player NOT invited to a couple of recent player weddings. If it's true, then neither the Dockers or Tigers will win a Premiership. We need leaders who inspire their teammates, not piss them off.


So a bit of FIGJAM?

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 15, 16, 17  Next
Page 4 of 17   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group