Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Welcome to Collingwood / Farewell Sam McLarty

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 6:20 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm bitterly disappointed that we didn't use pick 105 to get ourselves a genuine gun CHF. What were they thinking? Wink
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
magpieazza 

magpieazza


Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Location: Griffith N.S.W

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 1:16 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

E wrote:
magpieazza wrote:
Just thinking out loud and I don't want to sound pessimistic because I am fairly happy with what we got through the draft but.....

didn't we get some of those picks ( that we didn't use ), through trades for our players.
So effectively we weren't smart enough to foresee we were going to not use them? If that makes sense..


i think you are using hindsight to criticize the club. As a matter of fact, we didnt use all of the draft picks we stockpiled.

However, the reason to grab those picks was in case they were needed to match an unexpectedly high bid for Daics and Brown. I think it would have been a shame if a higher bid came in for us to go into deficit next year. I bet that factored in.

The other thing i would add is that even though we didnt take a fifth player in the draft this year, we had the option to do so if there was someone left at that pick that we really wanted. in other years we recruited guys like Langdon and Marsh late. I guess there just wasnt anyone that we wanted with that pick. Doesnt mean it was a mistake to preserve the option.


Having those extra picks for insurance for Daicos and Brown now makes sense.
I was just a tad annoyed we didnt use 61 as it was deemed a deep draft.

The amount of effort we used to scrape trades together for our quality players and then see them passed was annoying, but who cares if Im annoyed at something....they know more than I do.
Its all G, bring on 2017!!

_________________
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:19 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

McLarty with his Elite Contested Marking has something that sets him apart.

As 99% of Prospects he has something that needs working on. Like his Kicking

_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
Member 7167 Leo

"What Good Fortune For Governments That The People Do Not Think" - Adolf Hitler.


Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Location: The Collibran Hideout

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:33 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

magpieazza wrote:
E wrote:
magpieazza wrote:
Just thinking out loud and I don't want to sound pessimistic because I am fairly happy with what we got through the draft but.....

didn't we get some of those picks ( that we didn't use ), through trades for our players.
So effectively we weren't smart enough to foresee we were going to not use them? If that makes sense..


i think you are using hindsight to criticize the club. As a matter of fact, we didnt use all of the draft picks we stockpiled.

However, the reason to grab those picks was in case they were needed to match an unexpectedly high bid for Daics and Brown. I think it would have been a shame if a higher bid came in for us to go into deficit next year. I bet that factored in.

The other thing i would add is that even though we didnt take a fifth player in the draft this year, we had the option to do so if there was someone left at that pick that we really wanted. in other years we recruited guys like Langdon and Marsh late. I guess there just wasnt anyone that we wanted with that pick. Doesnt mean it was a mistake to preserve the option.


Having those extra picks for insurance for Daicos and Brown now makes sense.
I was just a tad annoyed we didnt use 61 as it was deemed a deep draft.

The amount of effort we used to scrape trades together for our quality players and then see them passed was annoying, but who cares if Im annoyed at something....they know more than I do.
Its all G, bring on 2017!!


Is it possible that we passed and did not use our final picks due to list management issues? It is possible that the remainder of the players we recruit this year may all be placed on the rookie list?

_________________
Now Retired - Every Day Is A Saturday
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:38 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

What would you do differently?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
selkevh 



Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Location: Brisbane

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 6:05 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

selkevh wrote:
magpieazza wrote:
^^ sorry, should have posted this in another thread.

BTW Sam is a Liverpool supporter so he is a favourite already!!


Hear Hear!!!


Whoops. Sorry. Only meant for that comment to be in agreeance of his support for Liverpool not the other aspect. My apologies.

_________________
A strong man stands up for himself ... a stronger man stands up for others.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MightyMagpie 



Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 6:08 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Member 7167 wrote:
magpieazza wrote:
E wrote:
magpieazza wrote:
Just thinking out loud and I don't want to sound pessimistic because I am fairly happy with what we got through the draft but.....

didn't we get some of those picks ( that we didn't use ), through trades for our players.
So effectively we weren't smart enough to foresee we were going to not use them? If that makes sense..


i think you are using hindsight to criticize the club. As a matter of fact, we didnt use all of the draft picks we stockpiled.

However, the reason to grab those picks was in case they were needed to match an unexpectedly high bid for Daics and Brown. I think it would have been a shame if a higher bid came in for us to go into deficit next year. I bet that factored in.

The other thing i would add is that even though we didnt take a fifth player in the draft this year, we had the option to do so if there was someone left at that pick that we really wanted. in other years we recruited guys like Langdon and Marsh late. I guess there just wasnt anyone that we wanted with that pick. Doesnt mean it was a mistake to preserve the option.


Having those extra picks for insurance for Daicos and Brown now makes sense.
I was just a tad annoyed we didnt use 61 as it was deemed a deep draft.

The amount of effort we used to scrape trades together for our quality players and then see them passed was annoying, but who cares if Im annoyed at something....they know more than I do.
Its all G, bring on 2017!!


Is it possible that we passed and did not use our final picks due to list management issues? It is possible that the remainder of the players we recruit this year may all be placed on the rookie list?


If we used it we wouldn't be able to nominate Cox Rd1 and have to wait for a LTI to promote him.

_________________
All We Can Be
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 6:24 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave The Man wrote:
McLarty with his Elite Contested Marking has something that sets him apart.

As 99% of Prospects he has something that needs working on. Like his Kicking


Elite contested mark and a dubious kick?

Give him no. 32 and play him CHF. Razz

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 6:30 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

stui magpie wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:
McLarty with his Elite Contested Marking has something that sets him apart.

As 99% of Prospects he has something that needs working on. Like his Kicking


Elite contested mark and a dubious kick?

Give him no. 32 and play him CHF. Razz


Not Sure what kind of Set Shot for Goal he is

_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
Damien Aquarius

Me Noah & Flynn @ the G


Joined: 21 Jan 1999
Location: Croydon Vic

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 6:41 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Just watched his pressed. Like the cut of his jib. Very down to earth. All four boys in fact.
_________________
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 8:07 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

magpieazza wrote:
^^ sorry, should have posted this in another thread.

BTW Sam is a Liverpool supporter so he is a favourite already!!


Ditto. Cool
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 8:18 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^

he follows soccer?

Sack him now.

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
simon tonna 



Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Location: carindale

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 8:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Damien wrote:
Just watched his pressed. Like the cut of his jib. Very down to earth. All four boys in fact.


theres one lad that is going to have to work harder than the rest imo.

and i sincerely hope he's the best of them all.

_________________
no second chances
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 12:55 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

stui magpie wrote:
^

he follows soccer?

Sack him now.

Grew up a Cats supporter and a Liverpool supporter.

One of my mates from uni used to play with cricket with him, and he couldn't speak highly enough of him. Reckons he'll be an absolute gun for the club.

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:49 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know what it is about him, but I've got a great feeling bout this kid. I reckon he could develop into a bigger and stronger version of Ben Reid. He could well surprise a few and force his way into our team earlier than expected.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group