Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Travis Cloke

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Do we need to start a petition to retain Cloke?
Yes
44%
 44%  [ 22 ]
No
56%
 56%  [ 28 ]
Total Votes : 50

Author Message
Cam Capricorn

Nick's BB Member #166


Joined: 10 May 2002
Location: Springvale

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 11:53 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

He will be here next year.
_________________
Get back on top.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:21 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Mugwump wrote:
^ great pic, Cam. Keep him fot that reason as well.

Nah, he's just too disloyal - he must have left for more money at least twice a year for the past 12 seasons.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
CarringbushCigar Taurus



Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Location: wherever I lay my beanie

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:24 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Only petition we need is the one to sack Bucks.

Or the mods who keep closing the sack Bucks threads.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:27 am
Post subject: Re: Travis ClokeReply with quote

AN_Inkling wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:
AN_Inkling wrote:
We need Cloke next year and today's game just solidified that view for me. The club, by their actions this year seem to have a different view, so do we need to start a petition?


If we'd had Darcy Moore in today instead of Cloke we'd have won the game. Cloke's miss from 30 metres out was too predictable.

I'd be happy to keep Cloke on our list, as a VFL player, in reserve in case of an injury to Moore, but i'm sure Travis would not accept that. For that reason, I expect it will be he who seeks a trade, not Collingwood. Even today, on one leg, I thought White was our best key forward.

Disagree. Moore would not have made the contest that Cloke did, at the moment he's only good when he gets a run at the ball otherwise he's easily shifted and outpointed. Cloke's comfortably our best one on one key forward, without him we do not have a good mix of talls. Cloke was a big part of why we were able to stay in the game.

Imagine, say, Puopolo, Breust and Rioli at the fall of all of those balls or even, say, Didak, Davis, Medhurst and Thomas. Do you think it's possible that he could be a critical part of a Grand Final winning team without actually kicking many goals himself?

No, it's just an idle thought.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
jackcass Cancer



Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:34 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Cam wrote:
He will be here next year.


I agree.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
eddiesmith Taurus

Lets get ready to Rumble


Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Location: Lexus Centre

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:27 am
Post subject: Re: Travis ClokeReply with quote

RudeBoy wrote:
AN_Inkling wrote:
We need Cloke next year and today's game just solidified that view for me. The club, by their actions this year seem to have a different view, so do we need to start a petition?


If we'd had Darcy Moore in today instead of Cloke we'd have won the game. Cloke's miss from 30 metres out was too predictable.

I'd be happy to keep Cloke on our list, as a VFL player, in reserve in case of an injury to Moore, but i'm sure Travis would not accept that. For that reason, I expect it will be he who seeks a trade, not Collingwood. Even today, on one leg, I thought White was our best key forward.


What utter rubbish, what about Darcy's shocking misses in the loss to the Bulldogs? I could say Cloke plays that game instead of Moore we win... Rolling Eyes
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:16 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I also agree, but not for the Clanger reason. Simply because at least three of Clokes marks were held by sheer strength. One was an absolute blinder. Moore simply is not strong enough yet, I'm glad he wasn't available, because if he was, I doubt Cloke would have played, and his little body would have been smashed by the thuggery that is the Hawks style.

When Jessie went down whose heart sank with him? There is still a place for Cloke, and with both him and Moore firing, working together, a couple of crumbers back from injury, we have the most terrifying forward line in the comp. what we need is a defensive general. We need a solid ready made defensive KPP. Quite ironic that in the MM days we never lacked for a defence. We had the best in the competition for years.

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
3rd degree Aries



Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: John Wren's tote

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 10:55 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

We still need Cloke, sure he misses set shots but he provided a lot at the contest and has a lot more smarts than Cox and can show Moore how to use his body and positioning himself. Cloke is such a hard worker off the footy.
_________________
" Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".

www.facebook/the hybernators
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
SwansWay 



Joined: 13 May 2015


PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:08 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I still think we can play Moore, White and Cloke all in the same team. Remember Moore can switch to CHB and Jesse is the perfect utility as well. Imagine those three guys with Elliott, Crocker, Aish or Fasolo at the fall of the footy. That's a very potent forward line.

Because White and Moore are so mobile, we wouldn't be top-heavy. Technically we went in with three talls yesterday anyway with Goldsack. I say keep Travis.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
woftam Gemini

I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.


Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Carum Downs, Vic

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:05 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

3rd degree wrote:
We still need Cloke, sure he misses set shots but he provided a lot at the contest and has a lot more smarts than Cox and can show Moore how to use his body and positioning himself. Cloke is such a hard worker off the footy.



I agree. We need both Moore & Cloke in our forward line. Hate to see him in another jumper.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Lazza 



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:41 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

jackcass wrote:
Cam wrote:
He will be here next year.


I agree.


Here's hoping that you two are right.

_________________
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Piesnchess 

piesnchess


Joined: 09 Jun 2008


PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:30 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

CarringbushCigar wrote:
Only petition we need is the one to sack Bucks.

Or the mods who keep closing the sack Bucks threads.


Even had we beat the dawks, youd still come out with this crap, just cant help yourself can you old son. Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes

_________________
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Piesnchess 

piesnchess


Joined: 09 Jun 2008


PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:33 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

think positive wrote:
I also agree, but not for the Clanger reason. Simply because at least three of Clokes marks were held by sheer strength. One was an absolute blinder. Moore simply is not strong enough yet, I'm glad he wasn't available, because if he was, I doubt Cloke would have played, and his little body would have been smashed by the thuggery that is the Hawks style.

When Jessie went down whose heart sank with him? There is still a place for Cloke, and with both him and Moore firing, working together, a couple of crumbers back from injury, we have the most terrifying forward line in the comp. what we need is a defensive general. We need a solid ready made defensive KPP. Quite ironic that in the MM days we never lacked for a defence. We had the best in the competition for years.


This. He is still OUR player with a one year contract, I say keep him, its not up to media prunes like Ping Ling, caro, fatboy robbo, carey to want him gone, its up to us and cloke, and I say we keep him. Idea

_________________
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MatthewBoydFanClub 



Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Location: Elwood

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:40 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Love the effort that Clokey put on yesterday.
Having said that better for Cloke to move on and restart his career at another club.
Better for us to move on and find another KPP to assist Moore.
Win for Cloke. Win for CFC.
Everybody wins.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
surfer1 



Joined: 18 May 2004
Location: Sydney ex Ararat

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:43 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Happy to keep him as long as doesn't play forward
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group