View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: Channel 9 future stars --Jack Frost | |
|
Thats the show with Terry Wallace and they had a list of players who may move on next year.
Usual suspects like Hurley but on on the shows list was Jack Frost
Where they established that I have no idea
so any one hear anything???? _________________ I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013 Location: WA
|
Post subject: Re: Channel 9 future stars --Jack Frost | |
|
barrybc41 wrote: | Thats the show with Terry Wallace and they had a list of players who may move on next year.
Usual suspects like Hurley but on on the shows list was Jack Frost
Where they established that I have no idea
so any one hear anything???? |
It would be reasonable speculation that he might look for opportunities given limited senior time in 2016. Hopefully he stays. _________________ All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
inxs88
Joined: 17 Aug 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Time to go for Jack. He has reverted to playing selfish football by only worrying about his own player and not spreading to intercept or spoil another. This was a hallmark in his game in previous seasons. Combined that he has no offensive qualities to hurt the opposition, his prospects with us should be limited. What clubs out there would he suit??
* Brisbane: Merrett shall retire/delisted
* Carlton: Jamieson as above. Plus Rowe is pushing 29
* Freo: lacking in this area with no McPharlin and M Johnson 32
* Melbourne: his brother Sam is there, Dunn and Garland are on last legs plus Tom McDonald has a godfather offer from Sydney
* Port Adelaide: Carlile on the wane
* GWS: when Travis Cloke monsters you, it's obvious messrs Corr and outgoing Tomlinson & Marchbank likely to be at Carlton next year.
* Richmond: Astbury, Elton and Vickery all under review plus Chaplin retiring they may be 1-2 bigs short.
* Saints: Delaney not up to it, Dempster 33 in January, Sam Fisher to retire and Sam Gilbert rising 30, they may be interested
* Swans: with Ted Richards to retire, Heath Grundy 30 and Laidler a dud, Swans may play their hand here.
* Bulldogs: are one key defender short at the moment.
So like any trading scenario there only needs to be 2-3 clubs showing interest for his trade value to increase. _________________ I love the Pies, hate Carlscum |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
Aish was also on Today _________________ I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
His endevour not in doubt but his disposal has always been a problem for me _________________ I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
inxs88 wrote: | Time to go for Jack. He has reverted to playing selfish football by only worrying about his own player and not spreading to intercept or spoil another. This was a hallmark in his game in previous seasons. Combined that he has no offensive qualities to hurt the opposition, his prospects with us should be limited. What clubs out there would he suit??
* Brisbane: Merrett shall retire/delisted
* Carlton: Jamieson as above. Plus Rowe is pushing 29
* Freo: lacking in this area with no McPharlin and M Johnson 32
* Melbourne: his brother Sam is there, Dunn and Garland are on last legs plus Tom McDonald has a godfather offer from Sydney
* Port Adelaide: Carlile on the wane
* GWS: when Travis Cloke monsters you, it's obvious messrs Corr and outgoing Tomlinson & Marchbank likely to be at Carlton next year.
* Richmond: Astbury, Elton and Vickery all under review plus Chaplin retiring they may be 1-2 bigs short.
* Saints: Delaney not up to it, Dempster 33 in January, Sam Fisher to retire and Sam Gilbert rising 30, they may be interested
* Swans: with Ted Richards to retire, Heath Grundy 30 and Laidler a dud, Swans may play their hand here.
* Bulldogs: are one key defender short at the moment.
So like any trading scenario there only needs to be 2-3 clubs showing interest for his trade value to increase. |
You forgot Hawthorn: With Lake retired and Gibson nearing the end, they may very well want a player like Frost. He has excellent disposal efficiency and spoils emphatically (sometimes). |
|
|
|
|
colin_wood
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Darkstranger
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
|
Post subject: | |
|
inxs88 wrote: | Time to go for Jack. He has reverted to playing selfish football by only worrying about his own player and not spreading to intercept or spoil another. This was a hallmark in his game in previous seasons. Combined that he has no offensive qualities to hurt the opposition, his prospects with us should be limited. What clubs out there would he suit??
* Brisbane: Merrett shall retire/delisted
* Carlton: Jamieson as above. Plus Rowe is pushing 29
* Freo: lacking in this area with no McPharlin and M Johnson 32
* Melbourne: his brother Sam is there, Dunn and Garland are on last legs plus Tom McDonald has a godfather offer from Sydney
* Port Adelaide: Carlile on the wane
* GWS: when Travis Cloke monsters you, it's obvious messrs Corr and outgoing Tomlinson & Marchbank likely to be at Carlton next year.
* Richmond: Astbury, Elton and Vickery all under review plus Chaplin retiring they may be 1-2 bigs short.
* Saints: Delaney not up to it, Dempster 33 in January, Sam Fisher to retire and Sam Gilbert rising 30, they may be interested
* Swans: with Ted Richards to retire, Heath Grundy 30 and Laidler a dud, Swans may play their hand here.
* Bulldogs: are one key defender short at the moment.
So like any trading scenario there only needs to be 2-3 clubs showing interest for his trade value to increase. |
What about us? Brown ineffective, Toovey & Goldsack just about done and Reid, injury prone? _________________ There is Collingwood and then the rest. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
And yet he can't get a game with us? Isn't there a bit of a message there? |
|
|
|
|
mattys123
Joined: 07 Jul 2009 Location: Narre Warren, VIC
|
Post subject: | |
|
Letting Frost go for a draft pick or a trade for a player in a different position would be one of the worst mistakes we've made in years.
Why trade players just for trades sake?
We have Brown, who will be 28 next year and has been injury prone in the past.
If we trade Frost out, we would be left with a player coming off a 2 year hiatus as our only key defensive backup.
Keep Frost if we possibly can, depth is important. |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
barrybc41 wrote: | His endevour not in doubt but his disposal has always been a problem for me |
Great Defender is Frost but has next to no Offensive Game _________________ I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
mattys123 wrote: | Letting Frost go for a draft pick or a trade for a player in a different position would be one of the worst mistakes we've made in years.
Why trade players just for trades sake?
We have Brown, who will be 28 next year and has been injury prone in the past.
If we trade Frost out, we would be left with a player coming off a 2 year hiatus as our only key defensive backup.
Keep Frost if we possibly can, depth is important. |
So should we Trade Keeffe? _________________ I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
inxs88
Joined: 17 Aug 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
mattys123 wrote: | Letting Frost go for a draft pick or a trade for a player in a different position would be one of the worst mistakes we've made in years.
Why trade players just for trades sake?
We have Brown, who will be 28 next year and has been injury prone in the past.
If we trade Frost out, we would be left with a player coming off a 2 year hiatus as our only key defensive backup.
Keep Frost if we possibly can, depth is important. |
Between:
* Brown
* Marsh
* Goldsack
* Reid
* Oxley
* Howe
plus 1-2 recruits we have the scope to offload Frost! _________________ I love the Pies, hate Carlscum |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Location: Bendigo
|
Post subject: | |
|
mattys123 wrote: | Letting Frost go for a draft pick or a trade for a player in a different position would be one of the worst mistakes we've made in years.
Why trade players just for trades sake?
We have Brown, who will be 28 next year and has been injury prone in the past.
If we trade Frost out, we would be left with a player coming off a 2 year hiatus as our only key defensive backup.
Keep Frost if we possibly can, depth is important. |
Yep this. |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Location: Bendigo
|
Post subject: | |
|
Dave The Man wrote: | barrybc41 wrote: | His endevour not in doubt but his disposal has always been a problem for me |
Great Defender is Frost but has next to no Offensive Game |
First role of a defender is to defend and if you can nullify the effectiveness of a Kennedy or Franklin then you've done your job. |
|
|
|
|
|